Jürgen Meyerhoff : Citation Profile


Are you Jürgen Meyerhoff?

Technische Universität Berlin

14

H index

21

i10 index

615

Citations

RESEARCH PRODUCTION:

47

Articles

15

Papers

1

Chapters

RESEARCH ACTIVITY:

   17 years (2003 - 2020). See details.
   Cites by year: 36
   Journals where Jürgen Meyerhoff has often published
   Relations with other researchers
   Recent citing documents: 117.    Total self citations: 26 (4.06 %)

MORE DETAILS IN:
ABOUT THIS REPORT:

   Permalink: http://citec.repec.org/pme601
   Updated: 2020-10-17    RAS profile: 2020-06-04    
   Missing citations? Add them    Incorrect content? Let us know

Relations with other researchers


Works with:

Bartczak, Anna (6)

Czajkowski, Mikolaj (4)

Mariel, Petr (4)

Sagebiel, Julian (3)

Artell, Janne (2)

Rehdanz, Katrin (2)

Authors registered in RePEc who have co-authored more than one work in the last five years with Jürgen Meyerhoff.

Is cited by:

Czajkowski, Mikolaj (47)

Hanley, Nick (21)

Brouwer, Roy (15)

Zawojska, Ewa (13)

Scarpa, Riccardo (13)

Budzinski, Wiktor (12)

Rodríguez-Entrena, Macario (11)

Boyle, Kevin (11)

Johnston, Robert (11)

Artell, Janne (11)

Ladenburg, Jacob (11)

Cites to:

Scarpa, Riccardo (90)

Hensher, David (58)

Rose, John (49)

Adamowicz, Wiktor (49)

Hanley, Nick (43)

Campbell, Danny (33)

Bennett, Jeffrey (24)

Train, Kenneth (23)

Brouwer, Roy (22)

Bateman, Ian (22)

Boxall, Peter (21)

Main data


Where Jürgen Meyerhoff has published?


Journals with more than one article published# docs
Environmental & Resource Economics6
Ecological Economics5
Energy Policy4
Journal of Forest Economics4
Journal of choice modelling3
Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales2
Resource and Energy Economics2
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics2
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management2
PLOS ONE2
Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy2

Working Papers Series with more than one paper published# docs
Working Papers / Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw6

Recent works citing Jürgen Meyerhoff (2020 and 2019)


YearTitle of citing document
2020Estimation of the preferences for the intertemporal services from groundwater. (2020). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Kovacs, Kent ; Snell, Heather ; West, Grant H. In: 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri. RePEc:ags:aaea20:304220.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020A Meta‐analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Cultural Services from Grasslands in Europe. (2020). Finger, Robert ; Huber, Robert. In: Journal of Agricultural Economics. RePEc:bla:jageco:v:71:y:2020:i:2:p:357-383.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019How does trust in institutions affect protest responses in environmental valuation surveys?. (2019). Champonnois, Victor. In: Economics Bulletin. RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-19-00047.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Farmers preferences for high-input agriculture supported by site-specific extension services: Evidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria. (2019). Maertens, Miet ; Craufurd, Peter ; Kamara, Yaya Alpha ; Vranken, Liesbet ; Vanlauwe, Bernard ; Chamberlin, Jordan ; Oyinbo, Oyakhilomen. In: Agricultural Systems. RePEc:eee:agisys:v:173:y:2019:i:c:p:12-26.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Impact of introducing penalty-cost on optimal design of renewable energy systems for net zero energy buildings. (2019). Lu, Jinli ; Huang, Zhijia ; Zhang, Xiao-Ping ; Wang, Dong. In: Applied Energy. RePEc:eee:appene:v:235:y:2019:i:c:p:106-116.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Attribute non-attendance in wine choice: Contrasts between stated and inferred approaches. (2020). Loureno-Gomes, Lina ; Costa, Ligia M ; Gonalves, Tania. In: Economic Analysis and Policy. RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:66:y:2020:i:c:p:262-275.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Application of the New Environmental Paradigm to Greece: A critical case study. (2020). Matsiori, Steriani K. In: Economic Analysis and Policy. RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:66:y:2020:i:c:p:335-344.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Valuing the Environmental Costs of Local Development: Evidence From Households in Western Nepal. (2019). Jeuland, Marc ; Pakhtigian, Emily L. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:158:y:2019:i:c:p:158-167.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Ocean Acidification, Consumers Preferences, and Market Adaptation Strategies in the Mussel Aquaculture Industry. (2019). Vásquez Lavín, Felipe ; Ponce Oliva, Roberto ; Hernández, Jose Ignacio ; Gelcich, Stefan ; Gonzalez, Pablo S ; Vargas, Cristian A ; Hernandez, Jose Ignacio ; san Martin, Valeska A ; Vasquez-Lavin, Felipe . In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:158:y:2019:i:c:p:42-50.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Testing Temporal Stability of Recreation Values. (2019). Dyack, Brenda ; Rolfe, John. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:159:y:2019:i:c:p:75-83.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Support for Transnational Conservation in a Gain-Loss Context. (2019). Strange, Niels ; Vogdrup-Schmidt, Mathias ; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:162:y:2019:i:c:p:49-58.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Distance decay and regional statistics in international benefit transfer. (2019). Artell, Janne ; Ahtiainen, Heini ; Pouta, Eija. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:164:y:2019:i:c:21.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Smartphone and tablet effects in contingent valuation web surveys – No reason to worry?. (2019). Navrud, Stale ; Skjeflo, Sofie ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Aa, Magnus. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:165:y:2019:i:c:9.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019A Structured Approach to Attribute Selection in Economic Valuation Studies: Using Q-methodology. (2019). Jensen, Anne Kejser. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:166:y:2019:i:c:7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Economic valuation of green and blue nature in cities: A meta-analysis. (2020). Bockarjova, Marija ; Koetse, Mark J. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:169:y:2020:i:c:s0921800918318986.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Managing conflicts between local land use and the protection of the Ethiopian wolf: Residents’ preferences for conservation program design features. (2020). Polyakov, Maksym ; Burton, Michael ; Hailu, Atakelty ; Pandit, Ram ; Estifanos, Tafesse Kefyalew. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:169:y:2020:i:c:s092180091832055x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of Mother Earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia. (2020). Lliso, Bosco ; Mariel, Petr ; Engel, Stefanie ; Pascual, Unai. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:169:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919301442.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Valuation of marine plastic pollution in the European Arctic: Applying an integrated choice and latent variable model to contingent valuation. (2020). Börger, Tobias ; Beaumont, Nicola ; Wyles, Kayleigh J ; Falk-Andersson, Jannike ; Aanesen, Margrethe ; Borger, Tobias ; Abate, Tenaw G. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:169:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919307360.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020When policy implementation failures affect public preferences for environmental goods: Implications for economic analysis in the European water policy. (2020). Perni, Angel ; Martinez-Paz, Jose Miguel ; Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:169:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919312340.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Trading off visual disamenity for renewable energy: Willingness to pay for seaweed farming for energy production. (2020). Mariel, Petr ; Longo, Alberto ; Demel, Simona. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:173:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919303787.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services. (2020). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Martin-Ortega, Julia ; Glenk, Klaus ; Faccioli, Michela. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:174:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919308626.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Public preference for river restoration in the Danda Basin, Nepal: A choice experiment study. (2020). Thacher, Jennifer ; Bohara, Alok K ; Kunwar, Samrat B. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:175:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919315228.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Contract Design for Adoption of Agrienvironmental Practices: A Meta-analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments. (2020). Minviel, Jean Joseph ; Fares, M'Hand ; Mamine, Fateh. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:176:y:2020:i:c:s0921800918313867.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Beyond Current Guidelines: A Proposal for Bringing Behavioral Economics to the Design and Analysis of Stated Preference Surveys. (2020). Getzner, Michael ; Schlapfer, Felix. In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:176:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919315708.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Advancing the relationship between renewable energy and ecosystem services for landscape planning and design: A literature review. (2019). Stremke, Sven ; Geneletti, Davide ; van Lierop, Martina ; Picchi, Paolo. In: Ecosystem Services. RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:35:y:2019:i:c:p:241-259.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Evaluating the contribution of forest ecosystem services to societal welfare through linking dynamic ecosystem modelling with economic valuation. (2019). Brady, Mark V ; Zanchi, Giuliana. In: Ecosystem Services. RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:39:y:2019:i:c:s2212041619300129.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Are non-monetary payment modes more uncertain for stated preference elicitation in developing countries?. (2019). Navrud, Stle ; Vondolia, Godwin K. In: Journal of choice modelling. RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:30:y:2019:i:c:p:73-87.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Simulation error in maximum likelihood estimation of discrete choice models. (2019). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Budziski, Wiktor. In: Journal of choice modelling. RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:31:y:2019:i:c:p:73-85.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019A web survey application of real choice experiments. (2019). Spiller, Achim ; von Meyer-Hofer, Marie ; Glenk, Klaus ; Liebe, Ulf. In: Journal of choice modelling. RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:33:y:2019:i:c:s1755534517301276.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Wind energy deployment in wind farm aging context. Appraising an onshore wind farm enlargement project: A contingent valuation study in the Center of Italy. (2019). Polinori, Paolo. In: Energy Economics. RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:79:y:2019:i:c:p:206-220.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Modeling energy efficiency insurances and energy performance contracts for a quantitative comparison of risk mitigation potential. (2019). Trankler, Timm ; Toppel, Jannick. In: Energy Economics. RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:80:y:2019:i:c:p:842-859.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Towards flexible energy demand – Preferences for dynamic contracts, services and emissions reductions. (2019). Ruokamo, Enni ; Svento, Rauli ; Merilainen, Teemu ; Kopsakangas-Savolainen, Maria. In: Energy Economics. RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:84:y:2019:i:c:s0140988319303111.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Onshore wind and the likelihood of planning acceptance: Learning from a Great Britain context. (2019). , Patrick ; Patrick, ; Anderson, Ben ; Harper, Michael ; Bahaj, Abubakr S. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:128:y:2019:i:c:p:954-966.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Impact of biogas plants on rural residential property values and implications for local acceptance. (2019). Termansen, Mette ; Panduro, Toke Emil ; Zemo, Kahsay Haile. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:1121-1131.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Public preferences for the Swiss electricity system after the nuclear phase-out: A choice experiment. (2019). Olschewski, Roland ; Jobin, Marilou ; Plum, Christiane ; van Vliet, Oscar. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:130:y:2019:i:c:p:181-196.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Does change in ownership affect community attitudes toward renewable energy projects? Evidence of a status quo bias. (2019). Toney, P ; Linnerud, K ; Holden, E ; Simonsen, M. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:1-8.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: A case from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. (2019). Giro, Marcus Vinicius ; Brannstrom, Christian ; Frate, Claudio Albuquerque ; de Azevedo, Armando. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:132:y:2019:i:c:p:185-195.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Wind farms, farmland occupation and compensation: Evidences from landowners’ preferences through a stated choice survey in Italy. (2019). Roselli, Luigi ; Faccilongo, Nicola ; Sardaro, Ruggiero. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:133:y:2019:i:c:s030142151930463x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Public willingness to pay for the research and development of solar energy in Beijing, China. (2019). Ning, Jing ; Kuang, Foyuan ; Lin, Yongsheng ; Wan, Xinyu ; Jin, Jianjun. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:134:y:2019:i:c:s030142151930549x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Acceptance of biogas plants taking into account space and place. (2019). Dobers, Geesche M. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:135:y:2019:i:c:s0301421519305749.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Complementing choice experiment with contingent valuation data: Individual preferences and views towards IV generation nuclear energy in the UK. (2020). Mourato, Susana ; Contu, Davide . In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519306196.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Estimation of the usage fee for peer-to-peer electricity trading platform: The case of South Korea. (2020). Cho, Youngsang ; Lee, Juyong. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519306378.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Firewood certification programs: Key attributes and policy implications. (2020). Vásquez Lavín, Felipe ; Barrientos, Manuel ; Herrera, Ivan ; Castillo, Alvaro ; Ponce, Roberto D. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519307463.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Local impact of community renewable energy: A case study of an Orcadian community-led wind scheme. (2020). van der Waal, Esther C. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:138:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519307785.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Multi-criteria and focus group analysis for social acceptance of wind energy. (2020). de Lucia, Caterina ; Amodio, Alessandro ; Sangiorgio, Valentino ; Caporale, Diana . In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:140:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520301415.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Minimum distances for wind turbines: A robustness analysis of policies for a sustainable wind power deployment. (2020). Reutter, Felix ; Drechsler, Martin ; Salomon, Hannes. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:140:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520301841.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Research on local acceptance cost of renewable energy in South Korea: A case study of photovoltaic and wind power projects. (2020). Koo, Yoonmo ; Lee, Hwarang ; Kim, Kyung Jae. In: Energy Policy. RePEc:eee:enepol:v:144:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520304134.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Wind energy expansion scenarios – A spatial sustainability assessment. (2019). Masurowski, Frank ; Eichhorn, Marcus ; Thran, Daniela ; Becker, Raik. In: Energy. RePEc:eee:energy:v:180:y:2019:i:c:p:367-375.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance in preferences for peatland conservation. (2019). Pouta, Eija ; Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna ; Artell, Janne. In: Forest Policy and Economics. RePEc:eee:forpol:v:104:y:2019:i:c:p:45-55.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ecuador: Results from a nationwide contingent valuation survey in a combined “referendum” – “Consequential open-ended” design. (2019). Elsasser, Peter ; Gordillo, Fernando ; Gunter, Sven. In: Forest Policy and Economics. RePEc:eee:forpol:v:105:y:2019:i:c:p:28-39.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Valuing recreational enhancements in the San Patricio Urban Forest of Puerto Rico: A choice experiment approach. (2019). Elbakidze, Levan ; Tavarez, Hector. In: Forest Policy and Economics. RePEc:eee:forpol:v:109:y:2019:i:c:s1389934119300930.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Understanding services from ecosystem and facilities provided by urban green spaces: A use of partial profile choice experiment. (2020). Kuriyama, Koichi ; Aikoh, Tetsuya ; Tsuge, Takahiro ; Shoji, Yasushi ; Kim, Hyerin . In: Forest Policy and Economics. RePEc:eee:forpol:v:111:y:2020:i:c:s1389934119301923.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Assessing preferences for wildfire prevention policies in Spain. (2020). Loureiro, Maria ; Allo, M. In: Forest Policy and Economics. RePEc:eee:forpol:v:115:y:2020:i:c:s1389934119302977.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Citizens preferences for research programs on forest genetic resources: A case applied to Pinus pinaster Ait. in Spain. (2020). Soliño, Mario ; Agundez, D ; Alia, R ; Solio, M. In: Forest Policy and Economics. RePEc:eee:forpol:v:118:y:2020:i:c:s1389934119305714.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Assessing the economic value of an iconic urban heritage tree. (2020). Liu, Wan-Yu ; Chuang, Yu-Chou ; Lin, Hsin-Wei. In: Forest Policy and Economics. RePEc:eee:forpol:v:118:y:2020:i:c:s1389934120301337.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Do actions speak louder than words? Comparing the effect of risk aversion on objective and self-reported mitigation measures. (2020). Champ, Patricia A ; Gomez, Jamie B ; Falk, Lilia C ; Barth, Christopher M ; Warziniack, Travis W ; Brenkert-Smith, Hannah ; Meldrum, James R. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:169:y:2020:i:c:p:301-313.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The impact of wildfires on the recreational value of heathland: A discrete factor approach with adjustment for on-site sampling. (2020). Malina, Robert ; Rineau, Francois ; Witters, Nele ; Lizin, Sebastien ; Nobel, Anne. In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:101:y:2020:i:c:s0095069620300401.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences. (2019). Zawojska, Ewa ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Bartczak, Anna . In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:93:y:2019:i:c:p:63-84.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Mapping renewable energy subsidy policy research published from 1997 to 2018: A scientometric review. (2020). Shevchuk, Oleksandr ; Liao, Haolan ; Deng, Rumeng ; Shen, Neng. In: Utilities Policy. RePEc:eee:juipol:v:64:y:2020:i:c:s0957178720300503.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Public preferences for pasture landscapes in Germany—A latent class analysis of a nationwide discrete choice experiment. (2020). Musshoff, Oliver ; Schaak, Henning. In: Land Use Policy. RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:91:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719306180.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Assessing the cost of onshore wind development scenarios: Modelling of spatial and temporal distribution of wind power for the case of Poland. (2019). Fortin, M ; Hoffmann, B ; Eberbach, J ; Sliz-Szkliniarz, B. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. RePEc:eee:rensus:v:109:y:2019:i:c:p:514-531.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Social acceptance of offshore wind energy development in South Korea: Results from a choice experiment survey. (2019). Yoo, Seung-Hoon ; Kim, Ju-Hee. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. RePEc:eee:rensus:v:113:y:2019:i:c:37.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The offshore-onshore conundrum: Preferences for wind energy considering spatial data in Denmark. (2020). Knapp, Lauren ; Petrovi, Stefan ; Hevia-Koch, Pablo ; Ladenburg, Jacob. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. RePEc:eee:rensus:v:121:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120300095.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019NIMBY, not, in siting community wind farms. (2019). Boyle, Kevin ; Xu, Weibin ; Brahma, Sreeya ; Boatwright, Jessica. In: Resource and Energy Economics. RePEc:eee:resene:v:57:y:2019:i:c:p:85-100.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Public acceptance of and heterogeneity in behavioral beach trip responses to offshore wind farm development in Catalonia (Spain). (2020). Voltaire, Louinord ; Koutchade, Obafemi Philippe. In: Resource and Energy Economics. RePEc:eee:resene:v:60:y:2020:i:c:s0928765519300302.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Using an integrated choice and latent variable model to understand the impact of “professional” respondents in a stated preference survey. (2020). Broberg, Thomas ; Persson, Lars ; Sandorf, Erlend Dancke. In: Resource and Energy Economics. RePEc:eee:resene:v:61:y:2020:i:c:s0928765518304548.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019How to better represent preferences in choice models: The contributions to preference heterogeneity attributable to the presence of process heterogeneity. (2019). Collins, Andrew ; Hensher, David A ; Balbontin, Camila. In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. RePEc:eee:transb:v:122:y:2019:i:c:p:218-248.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Identifying the role of stated process strategies in business location decisions. (2020). Hensher, David A ; Balbontin, Camila. In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. RePEc:eee:transe:v:141:y:2020:i:c:s1366554520306797.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Evaluating producer preferences and information processing strategies for drought risk management tools in Bangladesh. (2019). Caputo, Vincenzina ; Ward, Patrick S ; Ortega, David L. In: World Development Perspectives. RePEc:eee:wodepe:v:15:y:2019:i:c:2.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Can the environment be an inferior good ? A theory with context-dependent substitutability and needs.. (2019). Martinet, Vincent ; Dupoux, Marion. In: Working Papers. RePEc:fae:wpaper:2019.08.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Regional Factors Driving the Deployment of Wind Energy in Spain. (2020). Tarancon, Miguel-Angel ; Ruiz-Fuensanta, Maria J ; Gutierrez-Pedrero, Maria-Jesus. In: Energies. RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:14:p:3590-:d:383514.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Energy Demand Management and Social Norms. (2020). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Bartczak, Anna ; Gobiowska, Bernadeta. In: Energies. RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3779-:d:388610.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Power and Wind Shear Implications of Large Wind Turbine Scenarios in the US Central Plains. (2020). Pryor, Sara C ; Aird, Jeanie A ; Shepherd, Tristan J ; Barthelmie, Rebecca J. In: Energies. RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4269-:d:400591.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Explaining Factors Leading to Community Acceptance of Wind Energy. Results of an Expert Assessment. (2020). di Nucci, Maria Rosaria ; Krug, Michael ; Giuffrida, Laura Gaetana ; Nardi, Cecilia ; de Luca, Elena. In: Energies. RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:2119-:d:349949.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Excessive Application of Fertilizer, Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution, and Farmers’ Policy Choice. (2019). Ge, Yan ; Wu, Haixia. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1165-:d:208241.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Do Consumers Want to Pay for Green Electricity? A Case Study from Poland. (2019). Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1310-:d:210352.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Improving Social Acceptance of Waste-to-Energy Incinerators in China: Role of Place Attachment, Trust, and Fairness. (2019). Liao, Zhiming ; Ma, KE ; Chen, Tong ; Hou, Guanghui ; Yao, Tianzeng ; Xia, Hongmei. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1727-:d:216160.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Examining Relations Between Public Participation and Public Expenditure: Opinions from English and French Users on Environmental Issues in the English Channel. (2019). BARREIRO-GEN, Maria ; Lozano, Rodrigo ; von Haartman, Robin ; Carpenter, Angela . In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2230-:d:222487.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Local Economic Impact of Wind Energy Development: Analysis of the Regulatory Framework, Taxation, and Income for Galician Municipalities. (2019). Simon, Xavier ; Perez-Neira, David ; Copena, Damian. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2403-:d:225166.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Econometric Studies on the Development of Renewable Energy Sources to Support the European Union 2020–2030 Climate and Energy Framework: A Critical Appraisal. (2020). Martinez-Rodriguez, Isabel ; Tarancon, Miguel-Angel ; Callejas-Albiana, Fernando-Evaristo ; Quintana-Rojo, Consolacion. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4828-:d:370835.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Measurement of Fairness Perceptions in Energy Transition Research: A Factorial Survey Approach. (2020). Dobers, Geesche M ; Liebe, Ulf. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8084-:d:422179.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Community Acceptance of Wind Energy Developments: Experience from Wind Energy Scarce Regions in Europe. (2020). Aakre, Stine ; Leiren, Merethe Dotterud ; Krug, Michael ; di Nucci, Maria-Rosaria ; Julsrud, Tom Erik ; Linnerud, Kristin. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1754-:d:325501.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Temporal Distribution as a Solution for Over-Tourism in Night Tourism: The Case of Suwon Hwaseong in South Korea. (2020). Kim, Miseong ; Park, Chanyul ; Song, Hwasung. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2182-:d:331392.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The Development and Promotion of Sweet Potato Yoghurt in Ghana: Implications for Sustainable Production and Consumption Policies. (2020). Owusu-Sekyere, Enoch ; Donkor, Emmanuel . In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3336-:d:347850.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Guilt, Gender, and Work-Life Balance in Japan: A Choice Experiment. (2019). Munro, Alistair ; Aoyagi, Chie . In: IMF Working Papers. RePEc:imf:imfwpa:19/261.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Nutrient Trading Between Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Baltic Sea Region. (2019). Ollikainen, Markku ; Hautakangas, Sami. In: Environmental & Resource Economics. RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0273-5.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Stated Preferences for Conservation Policies Under Uncertainty: Insights on the Effect of Individuals’ Risk Attitudes in the Environmental Domain. (2019). Kuhfuss, Laure ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Faccioli, Michela. In: Environmental & Resource Economics. RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0276-2.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Did You Miss Something? Inattentive Respondents in Discrete Choice Experiments. (2019). Sandorf, Erlend Dancke. In: Environmental & Resource Economics. RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0296-y.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Antecedent Volition and Spatial Effects: Can Multiple Goal Pursuit Mitigate Distance Decay?. (2020). Thiene, Mara ; Franceschinis, Cristiano ; Swait, Joffre. In: Environmental & Resource Economics. RePEc:kap:enreec:v:75:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00344-9.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The Impact of Spatial Patterns in Road Traffic Externalities on Willingness-to-Pay Estimates. (2020). de Jaeger, Simon ; Franck, Marieke ; Rousseau, Sandra. In: Environmental & Resource Economics. RePEc:kap:enreec:v:75:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00348-5.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Using Individualised Choice Maps to Capture the Spatial Dimensions of Value Within Choice Experiments. (2020). Bateman, Ian J ; Binner, Amy ; Burton, Michael ; Ferrini, Silvia ; Badura, Tomas. In: Environmental & Resource Economics. RePEc:kap:enreec:v:75:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00358-3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Non-participation and Heterogeneity in Stated: A Double Hurdle Latent Class Approach for Climate Change Adaptation Plans and Ecosystem Services. (2020). Yue, Ian T ; Swallow, Stephen K ; Chen, Zhenshan. In: Environmental & Resource Economics. RePEc:kap:enreec:v:77:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-020-00434-z.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Renewable energy policies in federal government systems. (2019). Neetzow, Paul ; Meya, Jasper. In: Working Papers. RePEc:old:dpaper:423.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Childrens Willingness to Pay for Environmental Protection. (2019). Guerriero, Carla ; Dardanone, Valentino. In: CSEF Working Papers. RePEc:sef:csefwp:550.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Environmentally sustainable versus aesthetic values motivating millennials’ preferences for wine purchasing: evidence from an experimental analysis in Italy. (2019). Cosmina, Marta ; Campisi, Barbara ; Bogoni, Paolo ; Marangon, Francesco ; Troiano, Stefania ; Gallenti, Gianluigi. In: Agricultural and Food Economics. RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:7:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-019-0132-x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Strategic cooperation for transnational adaptation: lessons from the economics of climate change mitigation. (2019). Hagen, Achim ; Kahler, Leonhard ; Roggero, Matteo. In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:19:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-019-09442-x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Payment and provision consequentiality in voluntary contribution mechanism: separate or joint effects?. (2020). He, Jie ; Poder, Thomas ; Ndefo, Franck ; Dupras, Jerome. In: Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences. RePEc:spr:lsprsc:v:13:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s12076-020-00242-5.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider. (2019). Campbell, Danny ; Erdem, Seda. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:12:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-018-0324-6.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

More than 100 citations found, this list is not complete...

Works by Jürgen Meyerhoff:


YearTitleTypeCited
2019Ownership structure, fairness and the future of wind energy development in Canada – A survey-experimental study In: 2019 Annual Meeting, July 21-23, Atlanta, Georgia.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0
2012Protester or non-protester: a binary state? on the use (and non-use) of latent class models to analyse protesting in economic valuation In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article10
2012Protester or non-protester: a binary state? On the use (and non-use) of latent class models to analyse protesting in economic valuation.(2012) In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 10
article
2015A simple method to account for spatially-different preferences in discrete choice experiments In: 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0
2013Stated or inferred attribute non-attendance? A simulation approach In: Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article11
2014Transferring landscape values using discrete choice experiments: Is meta-analysis an option? In: Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article2
2003Verfahren zur Korrektur des Embedding-Effektes bei der Kontingenten Bewertung In: German Journal of Agricultural Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2012Benefits of meeting the Baltic Sea nutrient reduction targets - Combining ecological modelling and contingent valuation in the nine littoral states In: Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper4
2016The impact of latent risk preferences on valuing the preservation of threatened lynx populations in Poland In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article6
2005Die Monetarisierung ökologischer Schäden in einer europäischen Haftungsregelung: Anmerkungen zur Schadensbewertung angesichts der Erfahrungen in den USA In: Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2014Ethical Consumption and Social Context: Experimental Evidence from Germany and the United States In: University of Bern Social Sciences Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper2
2015Wildfires in Poland: The impact of risk preferences and loss aversion on environmental choices In: Ecological Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article8
2014Wildfires in Poland: the impact of risk preferences and loss aversion on environmental choices.(2014) In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 8
paper
2017Choosing a Functional Form for an International Benefit Transfer: Evidence from a Nine-country Valuation Experiment In: Ecological Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article6
2018A More Flexible Model or Simply More Effort? On the Use of Correlated Random Parameters in Applied Choice Studies In: Ecological Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article3
2006Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation In: Ecological Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article54
2010Determinants of protest responses in environmental valuation: A meta-study In: Ecological Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article26
2014Stated and inferred attribute non-attendance in a design of designs approach In: Journal of choice modelling.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article14
2015Does the use of mobile devices (tablets and smartphones) affect survey quality and choice behaviour in web surveys? In: Journal of choice modelling.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article9
2013Do turbines in the vicinity of respondents residences influence choices among programmes for future wind power generation? In: Journal of choice modelling.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article22
2017Gain and loss of money in a choice experiment. The impact of financial loss aversion and risk preferences on willingness to pay to avoid renewable energy externalities In: Energy Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article16
2016Gain and loss of money in a choice experiment. The impact of financial loss aversion and risk preferences on willingness to pay to avoid renewable energy extarnalities..(2016) In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 16
paper
2017A turbine is not only a turbine: The role of social context and fairness characteristics for the local acceptance of wind power In: Energy Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article13
2016A Turbine is not only a Turbine: The Role of Social Context and Fairness Characteristics for the Local Acceptance of Wind Power.(2016) In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 13
paper
2010Landscape externalities from onshore wind power In: Energy Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article75
2011Combining spatial modeling and choice experiments for the optimal spatial allocation of wind turbines In: Energy Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article20
2012The effect of feed-in tariffs on the production cost and the landscape externalities of wind power generation in West Saxony, Germany In: Energy Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article8
2012The effect of feed-in tariffs on the production cost and the landscape externalities of wind power generation in West Saxony, Germany.(2012) In: Discussion Paper Series RECAP15.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 8
paper
2009Benefits of biodiversity enhancement of nature-oriented silviculture: Evidence from two choice experiments in Germany In: Journal of Forest Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article19
2009A bibliography and database on forest benefit valuation studies from Austria, France, Germany, and Switzerland - A possible base for a concerted European approach In: Journal of Forest Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article3
2012Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines In: Journal of Forest Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article17
2012Scale and taste heterogeneity for forest biodiversity: Models of serial nonparticipation and their effects In: Journal of Forest Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article15
2017Spatially explicit demand for afforestation In: Forest Policy and Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article5
2017Uncovering context-induced status quo effects in choice experiments In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article11
2012Preferences of Scotch malt whisky consumers for changes in pesticide use and origin of barley In: Food Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article8
2013Public preferences regarding use and condition of the Baltic Sea—An international comparison informing marine policy In: Marine Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article9
2015Heterogeneous preferences toward landscape externalities of wind turbines – combining choices and attitudes in a hybrid model In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article18
2015Learning how to choose—effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments In: Resource and Energy Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article1
2019Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments In: Resource and Energy Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article3
2010Comparing the performance of different approaches to deal with attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments: a simulation experiment In: BILTOKI.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper2
2014Choice modelling research in environmental and resource economics In: Chapters.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
chapter6
2020Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Time-of-Use Tariffs for Shifting Electricity Demand In: Energies.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2008Do protest responses to a contingent valuation question and a choice experiment differ? In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article34
2012Test–Retest Reliability of Choice Experiments in Environmental Valuation In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article25
2014A Meta-study Investigating the Sources of Protest Behaviour in Stated Preference Surveys In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article14
2015The Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choices in an Environmental Context In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article7
2020Contingent Behavior and Asymmetric Preferences for Baltic Sea Coastal Recreation In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2020Spatial Dimensions of Stated Preference Valuation in Environmental and Resource Economics: Methods, Trends and Challenges In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article4
2017Will the alphabet soup of design criteria affect discrete choice experiment results? In: European Review of Agricultural Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article1
2014Threatened Bird Valuation in Australia In: PLOS ONE.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2018From welcome culture to welcome limits? Uncovering preference changes over time for sheltering refugees in Germany In: PLOS ONE.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2020Trading off positive and negative service changes in childcare: a choice experiment using a latent class modelling approach In: Applied Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2006Stated willingness to pay as hypothetical behaviour: Can attitudes tell us more? In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article11
2010Take your swimsuit along: the value of improving urban bathing sites in the metropolitan area of Berlin In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article2
2014Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea - a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article19
2017Stated preferences towards renewable energy alternatives in Germany – do the consequentiality of the survey and trust in institutions matter? In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article9
2009Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity In: Land Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article58
2012Valuing the chances of survival of two distinct Eurasian lynx populations in Poland – do people want to keep doors open? In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper2
2013The Impact of Individual Risk Preferences on Valuing Preservation of Threatened Species: an Application to Lynx Populations in Poland In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0
2015Performance of different approaches in international benefit transfer: Insights from a nine country experiment In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper2
2016An updated bibliography and database on forest ecosystem service valuation studies in Austria, Germany and Switzerland In: Thünen Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper1
2010A modelling approach for allocating land-use in space to maximise social welfare - exemplified on the problem of wind power generation In: UFZ Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0
2014Complexity-induced Status Quo Effects in Discrete Choice Experiments for Environmental Valutation In: Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2020. Contact: CitEc Team