7
H index
5
i10 index
169
Citations
University of Manchester | 7 H index 5 i10 index 169 Citations RESEARCH PRODUCTION: 16 Articles 3 Chapters RESEARCH ACTIVITY:
MORE DETAILS IN: ABOUT THIS REPORT:
|
Works with: Authors registered in RePEc who have co-authored more than one work in the last five years with John Rigby. | Is cited by: | Cites to: |
Journals with more than one article published | # docs |
---|---|
Scientometrics | 6 |
Science and Public Policy | 4 |
Research Evaluation | 3 |
Year ![]() | Title of citing document ![]() |
---|---|
2024 | Cooperation and interdependence in global science funding. (2023). Sugimoto, Cassidy R ; Ahn, Yong-Yeol ; Wang, Feifei ; Lariviere, Vincent ; Miao, Lili. In: Papers. RePEc:arx:papers:2308.08630. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective. (2024). Sun, Zhuanlan. In: Journal of Informetrics. RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:2:s1751157724000142. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | Does the handling time of scientific papers relate to their academic impact and social attention? Evidence from Nature, Science, and PNAS. (2024). Wang, Yezhu ; Wu, Qiang ; Xie, Yundong ; Liu, Yuanyuan ; Hou, LI. In: Journal of Informetrics. RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:2:s1751157724000178. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | Public funding accountability: a linked open data-based methodology for analysing the scientific productivity and influence of funded projects. (2024). Olmeda-Gmez, Carlos ; Perianes-Rodrguez, Antonio ; Delbianco, Natalia R ; Cabrini, Maria Cludia. In: Scientometrics. RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s11192-024-04975-8. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
Year ![]() | Title ![]() | Type ![]() | Cited ![]() |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries In: Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 30 |
2005 | Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality In: Research Policy. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 34 |
2015 | Public procurement for innovation elements in the Chinese new energy vehicles program In: Chapters. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | chapter | 3 |
2016 | The impact of pre-commercial procurement on innovation In: Chapters. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | chapter | 6 |
2016 | The impact and effectiveness of entrepreneurship policy In: Chapters. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | chapter | 10 |
2005 | Handcrafted by 16 men: The impact of single and multiple authorship in collaborative research networks In: Research Evaluation. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 3 |
2008 | Characterisation and measurement methods for author productivity and research vitality: a study of the R&D management field In: Research Evaluation. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 |
2011 | Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: new dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation In: Research Evaluation. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 24 |
2005 | Testing the boundaries of public private partnership: the privatisation of the UK Defence Evaluation and Research Agency In: Science and Public Policy. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 3 |
2006 | Information technology research in the UK: perspectives on services research and development, and systems of innovation In: Science and Public Policy. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
2007 | From Aarhus to your house: The science and society interface In: Science and Public Policy. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
Public procurement and innovation: a systematic literature review In: Science and Public Policy. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 | |
2014 | On the horns of a dilemma: does more funding for research lead to more research or a waste of resources that calls for optimization of researcher portfolios? An analysis using funding acknowledgement data In: Scientometrics. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 4 |
2018 | Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation In: Scientometrics. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 9 |
2020 | Bringing the doctoral thesis by published papers to the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A quantitative easing? A small study of doctoral thesis submission rules and practice in two disciplines in the UK In: Scientometrics. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 |
2020 | Response to Dr. Breimer’s and Dr. Mikhailidis’ letter In: Scientometrics. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
2009 | Comparing the scientific quality achieved by funding instruments for single grant holders and for collaborative networks within a research system: Some observations In: Scientometrics. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 7 |
2013 | Looking for the impact of peer review: does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact? In: Scientometrics. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 33 |
2014 | Limits to the Implementation of Benchmarking Through KPIs in UK Construction Policy: Insights from game theory In: Public Management Review. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated February, 4 2025. Contact: CitEc Team