Koonal K. Shah : Citation Profile

Are you Koonal K. Shah?

University of Sheffield (1% share)

8

H index

6

i10 index

216

Citations

RESEARCH PRODUCTION:

22

Articles

27

Papers

RESEARCH ACTIVITY:

   11 years (2009 - 2020). See details.
   Cites by year: 19
   Journals where Koonal K. Shah has often published
   Relations with other researchers
   Recent citing documents: 21.    Total self citations: 28 (11.48 %)

MORE DETAILS IN:
ABOUT THIS REPORT:

   Permalink: http://citec.repec.org/psh341
   Updated: 2021-02-20    RAS profile: 2020-12-07    
   Missing citations? Add them    Incorrect content? Let us know

Relations with other researchers

Works with:

Devlin, Nancy (20)

Feng, Yan (8)

Shah, Kalim (4)

Cubi-Molla, Patricia (3)

Mott, David (3)

Lorgelly, Paula (2)

Authors registered in RePEc who have co-authored more than one work in the last five years with Koonal K. Shah.

Is cited by:

Devlin, Nancy (26)

Brazier, John (9)

pinto-prades, jose-luis (8)

Brouwer, Werner (8)

van Exel, Job (8)

Hernandez Alava, Monica (7)

Gerdtham, Ulf-G. (7)

pudney, stephen (7)

Gu, Yuanyuan (5)

Towse, Adrian (5)

Hultkrantz, Lars (5)

Cites to:

Devlin, Nancy (57)

Tsuchiya, Aki (35)

Feng, Yan (17)

Parkin, David (16)

Lancsar, Emily (12)

Brouwer, Werner (11)

Brazier, John (9)

Richardson, Jeff (9)

Shah, Kalim (6)

Rice, Nigel (6)

pinto-prades, jose-luis (6)

Main data

Where Koonal K. Shah has published?

Journals with more than one article published# docs
The European Journal of Health Economics7
PharmacoEconomics5
Health Economics3
Social Science & Medicine2
Health Policy2
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research2

Working Papers Series with more than one paper published# docs
Research Papers / Office of Health Economics18
Consulting Reports / Office of Health Economics8

Recent works citing Koonal K. Shah (2021 and 2020)

YearTitle of citing document
2020Who should be given priority for public funding?. (2020). Lim, Min Kyoung ; Bae, Eun-Young ; Lee, Boram. In: Health Policy. RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:124:y:2020:i:10:p:1108-1114.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The relative value of different QALY types. (2020). Gu, Yuanyuan ; Lancsar, Emily ; Donaldson, Cam ; Bulfone, Liliana ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Butler, Jim ; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte. In: Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:70:y:2020:i:c:s0167629618309573.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Living up to expectations: Experimental tests of subjective life expectancy as reference point in time trade-off and standard gamble. (2020). Brouwer, Werner ; Attema, Arthur ; Lipman, Stefan A. In: Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:71:y:2020:i:c:s0167629619302279.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Exploring the relative value of end of life QALYs: Are the comparators important?. (2020). McHugh, Neil ; Donaldson, Cam ; Mason, Helen ; Baker, Rachel ; Pinto-Prades, Jose Luis. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:245:y:2020:i:c:s0277953619306550.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020A new tool for creating personal and social EQ-5D-5L value sets, including valuing ‘dead’. (2020). Devlin, Nancy ; Ombler, Franz ; Hansen, Paul ; Sullivan, Trudy ; Derrett, Sarah. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:246:y:2020:i:c:s0277953619307026.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Examining the transnational health preferences of a group of Eastern European migrants relative to a European host population using the EQ-5D-5L. (2020). O'Neill, Stephen ; Hobbins, Anna ; Barry, Luke ; Kelleher, Dan ; Doherty, Edel. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:246:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620300204.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Health and wellbeing in Norway: Population norms and the social gradient. (2020). Lamu, Admassu Nadew ; Lindberg, Marie Hella ; Olsen, Jan Abel. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:259:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620303749.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Understanding the composite dimensions of the EQ-5D: An experimental approach. (2020). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Mullett, Timothy L ; McDonald, Rebecca. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:265:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620305426.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Elicitation and modelling of imprecise utility of health states. (2020). Golicki, Dominik ; Jakubczyk, Micha. In: Theory and Decision. RePEc:kap:theord:v:88:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-019-09707-6.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Health-related quality of life among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. (2020). Joseph, Royes ; Alshayban, Dhfer. In: PLOS ONE. RePEc:plo:pone00:0227573.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Value judgment of new medical treatments: Societal and patient perspectives to inform priority setting in The Netherlands. (2020). , Paul ; Vermeulen, Karin M ; Nicolet, Anna. In: PLOS ONE. RePEc:plo:pone00:0235666.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020How averse are the UK general public to inequalities in health between socioeconomic groups? A systematic review. (2020). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Stevely, Abigail K ; Holmes, John ; McNamara, Simon. In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01126-2.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020A vision ‘bolt-on’ increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery. (2020). Gandhi, Mihir ; Luo, Nan ; Janssen, Mathieu F ; Tan, Rachel Lee-Yin ; Wei, Yvonne Chung-Hsi ; Wong, Chee Wai ; Teo, Kelvin ; Ang, Marcus. In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01156-w.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Does linear equating improve prediction in mapping? Crosswalking MacNew onto EQ-5D-5L value sets. (2020). Lamu, Admassu N. In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01183-y.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Measuring intangible cost-of-morbidity due to substance dependence: implications of using alternative preference-based instruments. (2020). Casal, Bruno ; Rivera, Berta ; Rodriguez-Miguez, Eva . In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01196-7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Multiplicative modelling of EQ-5D-3L TTO and VAS values. (2020). Thakumar, Annushiah Vasan ; Shafie, Asrul Akmal. In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01233-5.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The Role of Survey Training Materials in Stated-Preference Studies. (2020). Vass, Caroline M ; Payne, Katherine ; Stichele, Geert ; Davison, Niall J. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-019-00391-w.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020A French Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L. (2020). Andrade, Luiz Flavio ; Pouvourville, Gerard ; Oppe, Mark ; Ramos, Juan Manuel ; Ludwig, Kristina. In: PharmacoEconomics. RePEc:spr:pharme:v:38:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s40273-019-00876-4.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States. (2020). Gerdtham, Ulf-G. ; Leidl, Reiner ; Ulf-G. Gerdtham, ; Ulf- G. Gerdtham, ; Teni, Fitsum Sebsibe ; Burstrom, Kristina ; Henriksson, Martin ; Rolfson, Ola ; Helgesson, Gert. In: PharmacoEconomics. RePEc:spr:pharme:v:38:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00905-7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Social tariffs and democratic choice—Do population?based health state values reflect the will of the people?. (2021). Schneider, Paul Peter. In: Health Economics. RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:104-112.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Works by Koonal K. Shah:

YearTitleTypeCited
2011NICEs Social Value Judgements about Equity in Health and Health Care In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper5
2013NICEs social value judgements about equity in health and health care.(2013) In: Health Economics, Policy and Law.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 5		article
2020Do people with private health insurance attach a higher value to health than those without insurance? Results from an EQ-5D-5 L valuation study in Ireland In: Health Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article0
2009Severity of illness and priority setting in healthcare: A review of the literature In: Health Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article41
2015Valuing health at the end of life: A stated preference discrete choice experiment In: Social Science & Medicine.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article11
2012Valuing Health at the End of Life: A Stated Preference Discrete Choice Experiment.(2012) In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 11		paper
2018Valuing health at the end of life: A review of stated preference studies in the social sciences literature In: Social Science & Medicine.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article5
2014The Expanding Value Footprint of Oncology Treatments In: Consulting Reports.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper4
2010The Publicly Funded Vaccines Market in Australia In: Consulting Reports.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2010The Publicly Funded Vaccines Market in the UK In: Consulting Reports.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2009Assessment and Appraisal of Oncology Medicines: NICEs Approach and International HTA Experience In: Consulting Reports.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2015Do Respondents Completing Abstract, Hypothetical Priority-setting Exercises Agree With the Policy Implications of Their Choices? In: Consulting Reports.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper2
2018Quality of Life in Long-term Cancer Survivors: Implications for Future Health Technology Assessments in Oncology In: Consulting Reports.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2019Public Preferences for Health Gains and Cures: A Discrete Choice Experiment In: Consulting Reports.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2020Meningococcal Vaccines: An International Comparison of Decision-Making Processes, Frameworks and Methodologies. Are Values Missing? In: Consulting Reports.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2013Exploring the link between health and wealth in decision making In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2012Understanding Social Preferences Regarding the Prioritisation of Treatments Addressing Unmet Need and Severity In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper3
2011Valuing Health at the End of Life: An Exploratory Preference Elicitation Study In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2011Is the Aim of the Health Care System to Maximise QALYs? An Investigation of In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper2
2010A Comparison of Alternative Variants of the Lead and Lag Time TTO In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper16
2013A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE VARIANTS OF THE LEAD AND LAG TIME TTO.(2013) In: Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 16		article
2010Using QALYs in Cancer: Review of the Methodological Limitations In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper8
2014Exploring the Interdependencies of Research Funders in the UK In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper2
2015An Investigation of the Feasibility and Cultural Appropriateness of Stated Preference Methods to Generate EQ-5D-5L Values in the United Arab Emirates In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2016Valuing Health-Related Quality of Life: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper53
2018Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England.(2018) In: Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 53		article
2016New Methods for Modelling EQ-5D-5L Value Sets: An Application to English Data In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper18
2018New methods for modelling EQ‐5D‐5L value sets: An application to English data.(2018) In: Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 18		article
2016Important Aspects of Health Not Captured by EQ-5D: Views of the UK General Public In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2017What is the Normative Basis for Selecting the Measure of Average Preferences for Use in Social Choices? In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper1
2017Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and the English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper6
2018Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets.(2018) In: PharmacoEconomics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 6		article
2017Age and Utilities: Issues for HTA In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2017A New Valuation Method: Directly Eliciting Personal Utility Functions In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper1
2019Valuing EQ-5D-Y Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment: Do Adult and Adolescent Preferences Differ? In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2020Anchoring Latent Scale Values for the EQ-5D-Y at 0 = Dead In: Research Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2013One-to-one versus group setting for conducting computer-assisted TTO studies: findings from pilot studies in England and the Netherlands In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article2
2014Valuing health at the end of life: an empirical study of public preferences In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article13
2018Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states ‘in context’ using a discrete choice experiment In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article3
2019A new method for valuing health: directly eliciting personal utility functions In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article5
2020Economic evaluation of meningococcal vaccines: considerations for the future In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article0
2020An exploration of methods for obtaining 0 = dead anchors for latent scale EQ-5D-Y values In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article0
2020HTA methodology and value frameworks for evaluation and policy making for cell and gene therapies In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article0
2017Views of the UK General Public on Important Aspects of Health Not Captured by EQ-5D In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article1
2018Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article2
2016EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes In: PharmacoEconomics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article9
2018Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L In: PharmacoEconomics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article2
2018Correction to: Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets In: PharmacoEconomics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article1
2020International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L In: PharmacoEconomics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article0

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated November, 2 2021. Contact: CitEc Team