Caroline Mary Vass : Citation Profile


Are you Caroline Mary Vass?

Research Triangle Institute (RTI)

4

H index

4

i10 index

79

Citations

RESEARCH PRODUCTION:

14

Articles

RESEARCH ACTIVITY:

   7 years (2014 - 2021). See details.
   Cites by year: 11
   Journals where Caroline Mary Vass has often published
   Relations with other researchers
   Recent citing documents: 41.    Total self citations: 11 (12.22 %)

MORE DETAILS IN:
ABOUT THIS REPORT:

   Permalink: http://citec.repec.org/pva898
   Updated: 2021-10-16    RAS profile: 2021-07-02    
   Missing citations? Add them    Incorrect content? Let us know

Relations with other researchers


Works with:

burton, michael (2)

Authors registered in RePEc who have co-authored more than one work in the last five years with Caroline Mary Vass.

Is cited by:

Lancsar, Emily (5)

Watson, Verity (5)

Jacquemet, Nicolas (3)

Shogren, Jason (3)

Bliemer, Michiel (3)

Hanley, Nick (2)

Genie, Mesfin G (2)

Oppewal, Harmen (2)

Wasi, Nada (1)

Donkers, Bas (1)

Vossler, Christian (1)

Cites to:

Lancsar, Emily (7)

Viney, Rosalie (7)

Hole, Arne (6)

burton, michael (5)

Hensher, David (5)

Fiebig, Denzil (5)

McFadden, Daniel (5)

Haas, Marion (4)

Hall, Jane (4)

Whittington, Dale (4)

Campbell, Danny (3)

Main data


Where Caroline Mary Vass has published?


Journals with more than one article published# docs
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research9
PharmacoEconomics2

Recent works citing Caroline Mary Vass (2021 and 2020)


YearTitle of citing document
2021Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity. (2021). Rose, John M ; Oppewal, Harmen ; Lancsar, Emily ; Haghani, Milad. In: Papers. RePEc:arx:papers:2102.02940.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Lancsar, Emily ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M. In: Papers. RePEc:arx:papers:2102.02945.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021A review of research into discrete choice experiments in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on Discrete Choice Experiments in Tourism. (2021). Kemperman, Astrid. In: Annals of Tourism Research. RePEc:eee:anture:v:87:y:2021:i:c:s0160738320302814.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Non-monetary numeraires: Varying the payment vehicle in a choice experiment for health interventions in Uganda. (2020). , Poppy ; Mujumbusi, Lazaaro ; Hanley, Nick ; Meginnis, Keila . In: Ecological Economics. RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:170:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919314120.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Can incentive-compatibility reduce hypothetical bias in smokers’ experimental choice behavior? A randomized discrete choice experiment. (2020). White, Justin S ; Buckell, John ; Shang, CE. In: Journal of choice modelling. RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:37:y:2020:i:c:s175553452030052x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Joint modelling of choice and rating data: Theory and examples. (2021). Hess, Stephane. In: Journal of choice modelling. RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:40:y:2021:i:c:s1755534521000373.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?. (2020). Swait, Joffre ; Donkers, Bas ; Bliemer, Michiel ; de Bekker-Grob, E W ; Veldwijk, J ; Bliemer, M. C. J., . In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:246:y:2020:i:c:s0277953619307312.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Incorporating discrete choice experiments into policy decisions: Case of designing public long-term care insurance. (2020). Wasi, Nada ; Chandoevwit, Worawan. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:258:y:2020:i:c:s027795362030263x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Patient chosen gap payments in primary care: Predictions of patient acceptability, uptake and willingness to pay from a discrete choice experiment. (2020). Mortimer, D ; Woode, M E ; Mazza, D ; Barton, C ; Epstein, D S. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:263:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620305037.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021To pay or not to pay? Cost information processing in the valuation of publicly funded healthcare. (2021). Genie, Mesfin G ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:276:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621001544.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Exploring young peoples preferences for STI screening in the UK: A qualitative study and discrete choice experiment. (2021). Ross, Jonthan ; Roberts, Tracy ; Al-Janabi, Hareth ; Jackson, Louise. In: Social Science & Medicine. RePEc:eee:socmed:v:279:y:2021:i:c:s027795362100277x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Governance mechanisms for sharing of health data: An approach towards selecting attributes for complex discrete choice experiment studies. (2021). Veldwijk, Jorien ; Mascalzoni, Deborah ; Kaye, Jane ; Coy, Sarah ; Bentzen, Heidi Beate ; Haraldsdottir, Eik ; Shah, Nisha ; Johansson, Jennifer Viberg. In: Technology in Society. RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001007.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021The slow uptake of electric cars in Italy and Slovenia. Evidence from a stated-preference survey and the role of knowledge and environmental awareness. (2021). Rotaris, Lucia ; Scorrano, Mariangela ; Giansoldati, Marco. In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. RePEc:eee:transa:v:144:y:2021:i:c:p:1-18.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Exploring Smallholder Farmers’ Preferences for Climate-Smart Seed Innovations: Empirical Evidence from Southern Ethiopia. (2021). Kuhl, Rainer ; Geda, Shimelis Araya. In: Sustainability. RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2786-:d:510714.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Consumer preference to utilise a mobile health app: A stated preference experiment. (2020). Robinson, Suzanne ; Norman, Richard ; Lim, David. In: PLOS ONE. RePEc:plo:pone00:0229546.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Eliciting preferences for outpatient care experiences in Hungary: A discrete choice experiment with a national representative sample. (2020). Baji, Petra ; Gulacsi, Laszlo ; Klazinga, Niek ; Kringos, Dionne ; Pentek, Marta ; Fernandes, Oscar Brito. In: PLOS ONE. RePEc:plo:pone00:0235165.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Preferences for Weight Loss Treatment Amongst Treatment-Seeking Patients with Severe Obesity: A Discrete Choice Experiment. (2020). Oneill, Ciaran ; Finucane, Francis ; Doherty, Edel ; Queally, Michelle. In: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:18:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-020-00554-z.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Using Eye-Tracking Technology with Older People in Memory Clinics to Investigate the Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Choices for EQ-5D-5L Health States Preferences. (2021). Ratcliffe, Julie ; Whitehead, Craig ; George, Stacey ; Norman, Richard ; Barr, Chris ; Wang, Kaiying. In: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40258-020-00588-3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Transforming discrete choice experiment latent scale values for EQ-5D-3L using the visual analogue scale. (2020). Wright, Penny ; Kind, Paul ; Meads, David ; Odwyer, John. In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01173-0.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021German tariffs for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluations at the end of life. (2021). Konig, Hans-Helmut ; Brettschneider, Christian ; Lobner, Margrit ; Riedel-Heller, Steffi ; Huynh, Elisabeth ; Dams, Judith. In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:22:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01260-2.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Personalized diabetes management: what do patients with diabetes mellitus prefer? A discrete choice experiment. (2021). Juhnke, Christin ; Sadler, Andrew ; Muhlbacher, Axel C. In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:22:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01264-6.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Risky business, healthy lives: how risk perception, risk preferences and information influence consumer’s risky health choices. (2021). Byrnes, Joshua ; Nghiem, Son ; Spinks, Jean. In: The European Journal of Health Economics. RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:22:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01291-3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals. (2020). Driel, Mieke ; Merlo, Gregory ; Hall, Lisa. In: Health Economics Review. RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:10:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-020-00295-8.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Patient Preferences in the Medical Product Lifecycle. (2020). Hillege, Hans L ; Falchetto, Rocco ; Drummond, Michael ; Terris-Prestholt, Fern ; Cook, Nigel S ; Bekker-Grob, Esther W ; Whitty, Jennifer A. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-019-00400-y.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best–Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?. (2020). Ratcliffe, Julie ; Lancsar, Emily ; Hutchinson, Claire ; Kaambwa, Billingsley. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-019-00406-6.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Finding Out What Matters in Decision-Making Related to Genomics and Personalized Medicine in Pediatric Oncology: Developing Attributes to Include in a Discrete Choice Experiment. (2020). McCarthy, Maria C ; Gillam, Lynn ; Cao, Alice ; Meshcheriakova, Elena ; McMillan, Laura J ; de Abreu, Richard. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00411-0.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The Impact of Reproductive Issues on Preferences of Women with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis for Disease-Modifying Treatments. (2020). Marti, Joachim ; Pepper, George ; Chataway, Jeremy ; Bekker, Hilary L ; Ford, Helen L ; Eskyt, Ieva ; Meads, David ; Manzano, Ana ; Schmierer, Klaus ; Pavitt, Sue H ; Okan, Yasmina. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00429-4.

Full description at Econpapers || Download 2020

Quantitative Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment from the Patients’ Perspective: A Systematic Review. (2020). Ono, Shunsuke ; Sugitani, Naoko. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00434-7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review. (2021). Bansback, Nick ; Howard, Kirsten ; Street, Deborah J ; Watson, Verity ; Harrison, Mark ; Pearce, Alison ; Bryan, Stirling. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00467-y.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Genomic Testing for Relapsed and Refractory Lymphoid Cancers: Understanding Patient Values. (2021). Pollard, Samantha ; Adam, ; Regier, Dean A ; Costa, Sarah. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00448-1.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Therapies in People with Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Risk Attitude in Treatment Decisions. (2021). Saposnik, Gustavo ; Gracia-Gil, Julia ; Terzaghi, Maria ; Caminero, Ana B ; de Silanes, Carlos Lopez ; Brieva, Luis ; Sempere, Angel P ; Sotoca, Javier ; Maurino, Jorge. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00454-3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download 2021

Public Preferences in Priority Setting when Admitting Patients to the ICU During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Pilot Study. (2021). Keizer, Iris Elise ; Schouten, Stephanie Else ; Til, Janine Astrid ; Trompert, Janneke Louise ; Gijsbers, Merle. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-021-00504-4.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021United States COVID-19 Vaccination Preferences (CVP): 2020 Hindsight. (2021). Craig, Benjamin Matthew. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-021-00508-0.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Increasing the Patient-Centeredness of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Through Patient Engagement in Core Outcome Set Development. (2021). Janssen, Ellen M ; Tambor, Ellen ; Clearfield, Elizabeth ; Messner, Donna A. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00424-9.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Designing Discrete Choice Experiments Using a Patient-Oriented Approach. (2021). Munro, Sarah ; Harrison, Mark ; Aguiar, Magda ; Laba, Tracey-Lea ; Bansback, Nick ; Hudson, Marie ; Kaal, Julia K ; Burch, Tiasha. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00431-w.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Health Economics Methodology Research: Reflections and Recommendations. (2021). Copping, John ; Coles, Jenny ; Al-Janabi, Hareth ; Nicholls, Jean ; Murphy, Jacky ; McLoughlin, Carol ; Dhanji, Nishit. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00445-4.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Patient and Public Involvement in Health Economics and Outcomes Research. (2021). Lorgelly, Paula K. In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-021-00505-3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Scope elasticity and economic significance in discrete choice experiments. (2020). Grimsrud, Kristine ; Dugstad, Anders ; Navrud, Stle ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Kipperberg, Gorm. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ssb:dispap:942.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow‐up question. (2020). Sutphin, Jessie ; Mansfield, Carol ; Boeri, Marco. In: Health Economics. RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:29:y:2020:i:10:p:1307-1315.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2021Weighting or aggregating? Investigating information processing in multi?attribute choices. (2021). Genie, Mesfin G ; Ryan, Mandy ; Krucien, Nicolas. In: Health Economics. RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:30:y:2021:i:6:p:1291-1305.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The caring experience and supportive care needs of male partners for women with gynaecologic cancer: A qualitative literature review. (2020). He, Hongye ; Song, Yongxia ; Tong, Huanhuan ; Ge, Xiaoling ; Wang, Wenru ; Hong, Jingfang ; Li, Shuwen. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4469-4481.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Works by Caroline Mary Vass:


YearTitleTypeCited
2017The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments In: Medical Decision Making.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article14
2018An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment In: Medical Decision Making.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article1
2019The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2018Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article2
2018Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article3
2019“I Was Trying to Do the Maths”: Exploring the Impact of Risk Communication in Discrete Choice Experiments In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article2
2020Opening the ‘Black Box’: An Overview of Methods to Investigate the Decision-Making Process in Choice-Based Surveys In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article3
2020Reporting Formative Qualitative Research to Support the Development of Quantitative Preference Study Protocols and Corresponding Survey Instruments: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article10
2020A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The Role of Survey Training Materials in Stated-Preference Studies In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article1
2021Mobilising the Next Generation of Stated-Preference Studies: the Association of Access Device with Choice Behaviour and Data Quality In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article0
2021Utilising Patient and Public Involvement in Stated Preference Research in Health: Learning from the Existing Literature and a Case Study In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article1
2014Risk as an Attribute in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of the Literature In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article16
2017Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Are We Ready Yet? In: PharmacoEconomics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article2
2019Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future In: PharmacoEconomics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article24

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated March, 2 2021. Contact: CitEc Team