Econ Journal Watch

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Latest citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII 1996 0.16 0 0 0 0.07 1997 0.17 0 0 0 0.09 1998 0.19 0 0 0 0.12 1999 0.29 0 0 0 0.19 2000 0.39 0 0 0 0.2 2001 0.34 0 0 0 0.18 2002 0.39 0 0 0 0.2 2003 0.41 0 0 0 0.21 2004 0.47 38 24 0 0 8 0.21 0.25 2005 0.11 0.45 23 4 38 4 75 3 0.13 0.29
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.   AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
Impact Factor:
Immediacy Index:
Documents published:
Citations received:

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006180-205 Sense and Sensibilities: Myrdal’s Plea for Self-Disclosure and Some Disclosures on AEA Members (2006).
Cited: 6 times.

(2) RePEc:ejw:volone:369-379 Learning to Lose a Leg: Casualties of PhD Economics Training in Stockholm (2004).
Cited: 6 times.

(3) RePEc:ejw:volone:331-358 Size Matters: The Standard Error of Regressions in the American Economic Review (2004).
Cited: 4 times.

(4) RePEc:ejw:volone:222-234 Kuznets Curveball: Missing the Regional Strike Zone (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(5) RePEc:ejw:volone:20064-44 Miscounting Money of Colonial America (2006).
Cited: 3 times.

(6) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006148-179 AEA Ideology: Campaign Contributions of American Economic Association Members, Committee Members, Officers, Editors, Referees, Authors, and Acknowledgees (2006).
Cited: 3 times.

(7) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006109-132 Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Taxi Deregulation? (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(8) RePEc:ejw:volone:82-105 Drug Policy (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(9) RePEc:ejw:volone:192-221 Does Economic Performance Correlate with Big Government? (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(10) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006210-235 Is the Swedish Welfare State A Free Lunch? (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(11) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006511-550 Knut Wicksell, Gustav Cassel, Eli Heckscher, Bertil Ohlin and Gunnar Myrdal on the Role of the Economist in Public Debate (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(12) RePEc:ejw:volone:359-368 Preference Falsification in the Economics Profession (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(13) RePEc:ejw:volone:20051-21 From Friedman to Wittman: The Transformation of Chicago Political Economy (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(14) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006236-250 The Welfare State Is the Wrong Target:A Reply to Bergh (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(15) RePEc:ejw:volone:498-514 The National Research Council Ranking of Research Universities: Its Impact on Research in Economics (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(16) RePEc:ejw:volone:175-184 In Sweden, Anti-Globalizationists Dominate Public Discourse, Econ Profs Do Little (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(17) RePEc:ejw:volone:455-464 Response to “Fashion Cycles in Economics” (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(18) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006551-602 Do Economists Reach a Conclusion On Rail Transit? (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(19) RePEc:ejw:volone:2005159-164 Salute to Schelling: Keeping it Human (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(20) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006275-282 The Costs of Critical Commentary in Economics Journals (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(21) RePEc:ejw:volone:244-259 Reply to Chang and Ram: Statistical Adequacy and the Reliability of Inference (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(22) RePEc:ejw:volone:47-54 An Ivory-Tower Take on the Ivory Trade (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(23) RePEc:ejw:volone:20073-45 Smoking in Restaurants: A Reply to Henderson. (2007).
Cited: 1 times.

(24) RePEc:ejw:volone:437-454 Fashion Cycles in Economics (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(25) RePEc:ejw:volone:200532-41 Rejoinder to Pesendorfer (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(26) RePEc:ejw:volone:2006398-406 On Testing the Connection between Economic Freedom and Growth (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(27) RePEc:ejw:volone:279-305 Licensing Doctors: Do Economists Agree? (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

Latest citations received in: | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002

Latest citations received in: 2005

(1) RePEc:ejw:volone:2005186-195 Second Reply to Caplan: The Power and the Glory of the Median Voter (2005). Econ Journal Watch

(2) RePEc:ejw:volone:200522-31 Reply to Caplan: On the Methodology of Testing for Voter Irrationality (2005). Econ Journal Watch

(3) RePEc:ejw:volone:200542-46 Second Reply to Coelho, Klein, and McClure (2005). Econ Journal Watch

Latest citations received in: 2004

(1) RePEc:ejw:volone:235-243 Response to Edwards and McGuirk: Income Level, Economic Growth, and Inequality: Flawed Methodology and Inaccurate Inference (2004). Econ Journal Watch

(2) RePEc:ejw:volone:244-259 Reply to Chang and Ram: Statistical Adequacy and the Reliability of Inference (2004). Econ Journal Watch

(3) RePEc:ejw:volone:369-379 Learning to Lose a Leg: Casualties of PhD Economics Training in Stockholm (2004). Econ Journal Watch

(4) RePEc:ejw:volone:437-454 Fashion Cycles in Economics (2004). Econ Journal Watch

(5) RePEc:ejw:volone:465-472 Rate of Economic Growth, Level of Development, and Income Inequality: Rejoinder to the Reply by Edwards and McGuirk (2004). Econ Journal Watch

(6) RePEc:ejw:volone:473-497 Scholasticism versus Pietism: The Battle for the Soul of Economics (2004). Econ Journal Watch

(7) RePEc:ejw:volone:55-57 Response to De Alessi (2004). Econ Journal Watch

(8) RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0058 Economics without Entrepreneurship or Institutions: A Vocabulary Analysis of Graduate Textbooks (2004). The Ratio Institute / Ratio Working Papers

Latest citations received in: 2003

Latest citations received in: 2002

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.