International Productivity Monitor

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII 1996 0.18 0 0 0 0.09 1997 0.21 0 0 0 0.08 1998 0.25 0 0 0 0.1 1999 0.32 0 0 0 0.15 2000 0.43 9 15 0 0 1 0.11 0.19 2001 0.44 0.41 14 29 9 4 25 1 0.07 0.17 2002 0.3 0.44 13 19 23 7 85.7 0.2 2003 0.52 0.47 17 27 27 14 28.6 5 0.29 0.22 2004 0.43 0.52 16 21 30 13 30.8 5 0.31 0.23 2005 0.27 0.56 15 8 33 9 33.3 3 0.2 0.25 2006 0.19 0.57 14 13 31 6 0 1 0.07 0.24 2007 0.21 0.48 12 19 29 6 16.7 2 0.17 0.22
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.   AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
Impact Factor:	Immediacy Index:
Documents published:	Citations received:

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:14:y:2007:5 EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: An Overview (2007).
Cited: 19 times.

(2) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:2:y:2001:5 The OECD Productivity Manual: A Guide to the Measurement of Industry-Level and Aggregate Productivity (2001).
Cited: 17 times.

(3) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:1 The Widening Canada-US Productivity Gap in Manufaturing (2002).
Cited: 9 times.

(4) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:1:y:2000:6 What Does Total Factor Productivity Measure? (2000).
Cited: 8 times.

(5) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:5 The Effect of Adjustment Costs and Organizational Change on Productivity in Canada: Evidence from Aggregate Data (2004).
Cited: 8 times.

(6) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:12:y:2006:2 The Boskin Commission Report: A Retrospective One Decade Later (2006).
Cited: 7 times.

(7) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:2 Why are Americans More Productive than Canadians? (2003).
Cited: 7 times.

(8) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:2 Canadas Recent Productivity Record and Capital Accumulation (2003).
Cited: 5 times.

(9) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:2:y:2001:2 The Importance of Innovation for Productivity (2001).
Cited: 5 times.

(10) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:10:y:2005:4 Are Productivity Levels Higher in Some European Countries than in the United States? (2005).
Cited: 4 times.

(11) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:5 The Contribution of ICT-Producing and ICT-Using Industries to Productivity Growth: A Comparison of Canada, Europe and the United States (2003).
Cited: 4 times.

(12) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:16:y:2008:3 What Is To Be Done for Better productivity Measurement (2008).
Cited: 4 times.

(13) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:4:y:2002:2 The Importance of Skills for Innovation and Productivity (2002).
Cited: 4 times.

(14) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:3:y:2001:2 The Irish Economic Boom: What Can We Learn? (2001).
Cited: 4 times.

(15) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:4 Productivity and Policy Reform in Australia (2002).
Cited: 4 times.

(16) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:1 Endogenous Growth, Productivity and Economic Policy: A Progress Report (2004).
Cited: 4 times.

(17) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:1:y:2000:7 Labour or Total Factor Productivity: Do We Need to Choose? (2000).
Cited: 4 times.

(18) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:1 The Growth Story: Canadas Long-run Economic Performance and Prospects (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(19) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:4 The Effect of Organizational Innovation and Information and Communications Technology on Firm Performance (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(20) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:3 What Have Two Decades of British Economic Reform Delivered in Terms of Productivity Growth? (2002).
Cited: 3 times.

(21) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:2 Recent Productivity Developments in Canada and the United States: Productivity Growth Deceleration versus Acceleration (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(22) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:13:y:2006:1 Benchmarking Canadas Economic Performance (2006).
Cited: 3 times.

(23) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:2 Ten Productivity Puzzles Facing Researchers (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(24) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:1:y:2000:8 The Challenge of Total Factor Productivity (2000).
Cited: 3 times.

(25) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:6 Future Productivity Growth in Canada: Comparing to the United States (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(26) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:5 Assessing Aggregate Labour Productivity Trends in Canada and the United States: Total Economy versus Business Sector Perspectives (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(27) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:4 Has Trend Productivity Growth Increased in Canada? (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(28) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:7 Future Productivity Growth in Canada: The Role of the Service Sector (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(29) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:6 The OECD Productivity Database: An Overview (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(30) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:3 Why Net Domestic Product Should Replace Gross Domestic Product as a Measure of Economic Growth (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(31) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:1:y:2000:2 The Productivity Renaissance in the U.S. Service Sector (2000).
Cited: 2 times.

(32) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:13:y:2006:3 Explaining Canada-U.S. Differences in Annual Hours Worked (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(33) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:2:y:2001:3 Whats New About the New Economy? IT, Economic Growth and Productivity (2001).
Cited: 2 times.

(34) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:10:y:2005:1 An Analysis of the Labour Productivity Growth Slowdown in Canada since 2000 (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(35) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:8 The Source of Economic Growth in OECD Countries: A Review Article (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(36) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:3 Differences in Annual Work Hours per Capita between the United States and Canada (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(37) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:1 Lessons for Canada from the U.S. Growth Resurgence (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(38) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:13:y:2006:2 The Economists Manifesto for Curing Ailing Canadian Productivity (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(39) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:2:y:2001:4 Is IT Driving the U.S. Productivity Revival? (2001).
Cited: 2 times.

(40) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:6 International Productivity Comparisons: An Examination of Data Sources (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(41) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:2 Raising Canadian Living Standards: A Framework for Analysis (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(42) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:1 Measuring the Canada-U.S. Productivity Gap: Industry Dimensions (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(43) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:11:y:2005:2 Productivity and Building Human Capital for the Bottom Third (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(44) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:5 Guide to the Measurement of Government Productivity (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(45) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:4 ICT, Output and Productivity Growth in the United Kingdom: A Sectoral Analysis (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(46) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:16:y:2008:5 Data for Productivity Measurement in Market Services: An International Comparison (2008).
Cited: 1 times.

(47) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:12:y:2006:4 The Boskin Commission Report After a Decade (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(48) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:7 Productivity Growth in Services Industries: Is There a Role for Measurement? (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(49) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:16:y:2008:1 Business Sector Productivity in Canada: What Do We Know? (2008).
Cited: 1 times.

(50) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:11:y:2005:7 Progress in Service Sector Productivity Measurement: Review Article on Productivity in the U.S. Services Sector: New Sources of Economic Growth. (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

Recent citations received in: | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

Recent citations received in: 2007

(1) RePEc:qld:uqcepa:27 Measuring Productivity Change without Neoclassical Assumptions: A Conceptual Analysis (2007). School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia / CEPA Working Papers Series

(2) RePEc:rif:dpaper:1106 A Maximum Entropy Approach to the Indenitication of Productive Technology Spillovers (2007). The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy / Discussion Papers

Recent citations received in: 2006

(1) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:12:y:2006:2 The Boskin Commission Report: A Retrospective One Decade Later (2006). International Productivity Monitor

Recent citations received in: 2005

(1) RePEc:bfr:banfra:133 A comparison of Structural Productivity Levels in the Major Industrialised Countries. (2005). Banque de France / Documents de Travail

(2) RePEc:pra:mprapa:7330 A comparison of structural productivity levels in the major industrialised countries (2005). University Library of Munich, Germany / MPRA Paper

(3) RePEc:sls:resrep:0506 What Explains the Canada-US ICT Investment Intensity Gap? (2005). Centre for the Study of Living Standards / CSLS Research Reports

Recent citations received in: 2004

(1) RePEc:imf:imfwpa:04/138 Economic Integration, Business Cycle, and Productivity in North America (2004). International Monetary Fund / IMF Working Papers

(2) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:2 Recent Productivity Developments in Canada and the United States: Productivity Growth Deceleration versus Acceleration (2004). International Productivity Monitor

(3) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:5 Assessing Aggregate Labour Productivity Trends in Canada and the United States: Total Economy versus Business Sector Perspectives (2004). International Productivity Monitor

(4) RePEc:sls:resrep:0404 Aggregate Labour Productivity Growth in Canada and the United States: Definitions, Trends and Measurement Issues (2004). Centre for the Study of Living Standards / CSLS Research Reports

(5) RePEc:sls:resrep:0410 The McKinsey Global Institute Productivity Studies: Lessons for Canada (2004). Centre for the Study of Living Standards / CSLS Research Reports

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.