CitEc
[home]     [Citation data for:  series | authors | papers]      [Maintainers]      [Submit references]      [warning | faq | about]
  Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370 references and 3.213.942 citations

 

 
 

Judgment and Decision Making / Judgment and Decision Making

Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Missing citations? Add them with our user input service
Incorrect content? Let us know

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII
19900.090000.04
19910.090000.05
19920.080000.04
19930.090000.05
19940.10000.05
19950.120000.06
19960.160000.08
19970.210000.08
19980.220000.09
19990.280000.13
20000.370000.16
20010.380000.16
20020.410000.2
20030.430000.2
20040.490000.22
20050.520000.24
20060.518140010.060.23
20070.42351518010.030.19
20080.130.43604353757.190.150.21
20090.110.43562395106070.130.19
20100.040.3652181165010.020.15
 
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

 

Main indicators

Most cited documents in this series:
YearTitleCited
2011The recognition heuristic: A decade of research
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:100-121 [Citation Analysis]
8
2010How to study cognitive decision algorithms: The case of the priority heuristic
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:21-32 [Citation Analysis]
7
2010Precise models deserve precise measures: A methodological dissection
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:272-284 [Citation Analysis]
7
2011Threshold models of recognition and the recognition heuristic
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:7-22 [Citation Analysis]
6
2010Why recognition is rational: Optimality results on single-variable decision rules
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:216-229 [Citation Analysis]
6
2011Four challenges for cognitive research on the recognition heuristic and a call for a research strategy shift
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:89-99 [Citation Analysis]
6
2010Less-is-more effects without the recognition heuristic
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:258-271 [Citation Analysis]
6
2007Goals and plans in decision making
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:2:y:2007:i::p:137-168 [Citation Analysis]
5
2008A short form of the Maximization Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies,
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:371-388 [Citation Analysis]
5
2008One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i:6:p:457-462 [Citation Analysis]
5
2010When less is more in the recognition heuristic
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:230-243 [Citation Analysis]
5
2008Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency,
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:364-370 [Citation Analysis]
4
2011Recognition judgments and the performance of the recognition heuristic depend on the size of the reference class
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:43-57 [Citation Analysis]
4
2008The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:5-17 [Citation Analysis]
4
2009How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:335-354 [Citation Analysis]
3
2006A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:33-47 [Citation Analysis]
3
2011Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (II)
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:1-6 [Citation Analysis]
3

repec:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:118-133 [Citation Analysis]
3
2010I like what I know: Is recognition a non-compensatory determiner of consumer choice?
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:310-325 [Citation Analysis]
3
2008On the perception and operationalization of risk perception
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:317-324 [Citation Analysis]
3
2009Searching for coherence in a correspondence world
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:154-163 [Citation Analysis]
3
2006Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gamblers fallacy
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:1-12 [Citation Analysis]
3
2011The limited value of precise tests of the recognition heuristic
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:5:p:413-422 [Citation Analysis]
3
2011Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:23-42 [Citation Analysis]
3
2008New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:292-303 [Citation Analysis]
3
2011Forecasting elections with mere recognition from small, lousy samples: A comparison of collective recognition, wisdom of crowds, and representative polls
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:73-88 [Citation Analysis]
3
2008Moral distance in dictator games
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:344-354 [Citation Analysis]
3
2009Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:3:p:200-213 [Citation Analysis]
3
2009Are complex decisions better left to the unconscious? Further failed replications of the deliberation-without-attention effect
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:6:p:509-517 [Citation Analysis]
2
2011The size and distribution of donations: Effects of number of recipients
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:7:p:616-628 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008An ecological perspective to cognitive limits: Modeling environment-mind interactions with ACT-R
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:278-291 [Citation Analysis]
2
2010Fast Acceptance by Common Experience - FACE-recognition in Schellings model of neighborhood segregation
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:5:p:391-410 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:195-204 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008Attachment to land: The case of the land of Israel for American and Israeli Jews and the role of contagion
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:325-334 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008The importance of learning when making inferences
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:261-277 [Citation Analysis]
2
2011The wisdom of ignorant crowds: Predicting sport outcomes by mere recognition
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:58-72 [Citation Analysis]
2
2009Information asymmetry in decision from description versus decision from experience
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:317-325 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008Perceived time pressure and the Iowa Gambling Task
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i:8:p:636-640 [Citation Analysis]
2
2011On the use of recognition in inferential decision making: An overview of the debate
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:5:p:423-438 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008Sequential evidence accumulation in decision making: The individual desired level of confidence can explain the extent of information acquisition
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:229-243 [Citation Analysis]
2
2011Recognition-based judgments and decisions: What we have learned (so far)
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:5:p:359-380 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:64-72 [Citation Analysis]
2
2009Numeracy, frequency, and Bayesian reasoning
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:34-40 [Citation Analysis]
2
2010Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:5:p:411-419 [Citation Analysis]
2
2009Correspondence and coherence in science: A brief historical perspective
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:126-133 [Citation Analysis]
2
2009On the relative importance of the hot stove effect and the tendency to rely on small samples
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:429-435 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:205-214 [Citation Analysis]
2
2008How to make a risk seem riskier: The ratio bias versus construal level theory
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:-416 [Citation Analysis]
2
2006Rebate subsidies, matching subsidies and isolation effects
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:13-22 [Citation Analysis]
1
2008Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention,
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:396-403 [Citation Analysis]
1

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 5:
YearTitleSee
2010Does AHP help us make a choice? - An experimental evaluation
RePEc:pra:mprapa:24213
[Citation Analysis]
2010Context and Interpretation in Laboratory Experiments: The Case of Reciprocity
RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2010-090
[Citation Analysis]
2010An incomplete ignorance state in repeated-play decision making: A note on Bayesian decision-theoretical framework
RePEc:pra:mprapa:28265
[Citation Analysis]
2010eGovernment: Does IT save time?
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00599187
[Citation Analysis]
2010Shift of reference point and implications on behavioral reaction to gains and losses
RePEc:lug:wpaper:1005
[Citation Analysis]

Cites in year: CiY

Recent citations received in: 2010

YearTitleSee
2010Success from Satisficing and Imitation: Entrepreneurs’ Location Choice and Implications of Heuristics for Local Economic Development
RePEc:pra:mprapa:26594
[Citation Analysis]

Recent citations received in: 2009

YearTitleSee
2009Introduction to the special issue: Coherence and correspondence in judgment and decision making
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:113-115
[Citation Analysis]
2009Theories of truth as assessment criteria in judgment and decision making
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:116-125
[Citation Analysis]
2009Coherence and correspondence in the psychological analysis of numerical predictions: How error-prone heuristics are replaced by ecologically valid heuristics
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:175-185
[Citation Analysis]
2009How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:335-354
[Citation Analysis]
2009The role of representation in experience-based choice
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:7:p:518-529
[Citation Analysis]
2009A fine-grained analysis of the jumping-to-conclusions bias in schizophrenia: Data-gathering, response confidence, and information integration}
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:7:p:587-600
[Citation Analysis]
2009The hot stove effect in repeated-play decision making under ambiguity
RePEc:pra:mprapa:17647
[Citation Analysis]

Recent citations received in: 2008

YearTitleSee
2008Expected Behavior in the Dictator Game.
RePEc:gra:wpaper:08/12
[Citation Analysis]
2008Perceived time pressure and the Iowa Gambling Task
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i:8:p:636-640
[Citation Analysis]
2008Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:195-204
[Citation Analysis]
2008Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:205-214
[Citation Analysis]
2008Intuitive decisions on the fringes of consciousness: Are they conscious and does it matter?
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:28-41
[Citation Analysis]
2008In the winning mood: Affect in the Iowa gambling task
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:42-50
[Citation Analysis]
2008Taboos and conflicts in decision making: Sacred values, decision difficulty, and emotions
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:51-63
[Citation Analysis]
2008Information Processing in Decisions under Risk: Evidence for Compensatory Strategies based on Automatic Processes
RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2008_42
[Citation Analysis]
2008Cognitive Biases and Gaze Direction: An Experimental Study
RePEc:usi:labsit:022
[Citation Analysis]

Recent citations received in: 2007

YearTitleSee
2007Framing the frame: How task goals determine the likelihood and direction of framing effects
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:2:y:2007:i::p:251-256
[Citation Analysis]

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.

Hosted by Valencian Economic Research Institute ©2012 Jose Manuel Barrueco | mail: barrueco@uv.es