| [home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
|
Updated February, 5 2013 465.484 documents processed, 11.198.332
references and 4.512.497 citations
|
|
|
|
|
2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia / Agecon Search
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2011), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.  Create citation feed for this series
Missing citations? Add them with our user input service
Incorrect content? Let us know
| Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
| 1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
| 1991 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1992 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1993 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1994 | | 0.12 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
| 1995 | | 0.17 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1996 | | 0.2 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1997 | | 0.21 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1998 | | 0.22 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.13 |
| 1999 | | 0.29 | 3 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
| 2000 | | 0.4 | 93 | 28 | 3 | | 0 | 3 | 0.03 | 0.15 |
| 2001 | 0.05 | 0.38 | | 0 | 96 | 5 | 0 | | | 0.18 |
| 2002 | 0.05 | 0.41 | | 0 | 93 | 5 | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2003 | | 0.44 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2004 | | 0.46 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2005 | | 0.46 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.25 |
| 2006 | | 0.49 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
| 2007 | | 0.42 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
| 2008 | | 0.43 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
| 2009 | | 0.4 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
| 2010 | | 0.33 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
| 2011 | | 0.5 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.27 |
| |
|
|
Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
| 2000 | Returns to New Technologies in the Australian Beef Industry: On-farm Research versus Off-farm Research
RePEc:ags:aare00:123749 [Citation Analysis] | 10 | | 2000 | Quality Signaling through Certification
RePEc:ags:aare00:123598 [Citation Analysis] | 5 | | 2000 | Best Practice Benchmarking in Australian Agriculture: Issues and Challenges
RePEc:ags:aare00:123728 [Citation Analysis] | 3 | | 2000 | An Economic Risk Assessment of the Impact on Producers of Removing Quarantine Restrictions
RePEc:ags:aare00:123647 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | | 2000 | Factors Influencing The Demand For Chickpea In India: Implications For Marketing And Promotion In The Indian Chickpea Market
RePEc:ags:aare00:123593 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2000 | Testing for Framing Effects in Environmental Choice Modelling
RePEc:ags:aare00:123727 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2000 | Agricultural response analysis in a longer term framework
RePEc:ags:aare00:123634 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2000 | Rethinking the Externality Issue for Dryland Salinity in Western Australia
RePEc:ags:aare00:123715 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2000 | EXPLAINING ECONOMIC INEFFICIENCY OF NEPALESE RICE FARMS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
RePEc:ags:aare00:123630 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2000 | The Demand for Meats in Indonesia: A Censored Regression Approach
RePEc:ags:aare00:123666 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2000 | DAM EA$Y: A Framework for Assessing the Costs and Benefits of On-Farm Storage Based Sugarcane Production Systems
RePEc:ags:aare00:123614 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2000 | Analysis of Farming Systems Issues in the Northern Cropping Region of NSW
RePEc:ags:aare00:123644 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0: Cites in year: CiY Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series. |
|
|
