CitEc
[home]     [Citation data for:  series | authors | papers]      [Maintainers]      [Submit references]      [warning | faq | about]
  Updated February, 5 2013 465.484 documents processed, 11.198.332 references and 4.512.497 citations

 

 
 

Research Evaluation / Oxford University Press

Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2011), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Missing citations? Add them with our user input service
Incorrect content? Let us know

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII
19900.080000.04
19910.08252000.04
19920.082102500.04
19930.092234600.05
19940.11704300.05
19950.1934123900.07
19960.232955100.1
19970.020.29063100.1
19980.292152900.11
19990.342622100.15
20000.040.4324547200.17
20010.452145000.17
20020.461874500.21
20030.030.48211939100.21
20040.030.5519439100.23
20050.030.5728340100.24
20060.020.54237471010.040.22
20070.4830135100.19
20080.020.5271053100.22
20090.050.5142057300.21
20100.040.4635069300.17
20110.644227700.26
 
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

 

Main indicators

Most cited documents in this series:
YearTitleCited
2003Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:17-27 [Citation Analysis]
9
2007Patent and publication activities of German professors: an empirical assessment of their co-activity
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:311-319 [Citation Analysis]
9
2008Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:17:y:2008:i:2:p:87-102 [Citation Analysis]
7
2003Service marks as novel innovation indicator
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:149-156 [Citation Analysis]
5
2002What do we measure by co-authorships?
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:11:y:2002:i:1:p:3-15 [Citation Analysis]
4
1995Linkage between agency-supported research and patented industrial technology
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:3:p:183-187 [Citation Analysis]
4
1998Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities?
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:7:y:1998:i:2:p:105-111 [Citation Analysis]
3
2001Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:10:y:2001:i:1:p:47-58 [Citation Analysis]
3
1995Measuring innovation in services
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:3:p:207-215 [Citation Analysis]
3
1993A study of research evaluation and planning: the University of Ghent
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:3:y:1993:i:1:p:25-41 [Citation Analysis]
3
2006Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:15:y:2006:i:3:p:187-195 [Citation Analysis]
3
2002Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:11:y:2002:i:1:p:17-26 [Citation Analysis]
3
1996Scientific publication activity of industry in the Netherlands
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:6:y:1996:i:2:p:105-119 [Citation Analysis]
3
1998Measuring the economic benefits of research and development: The current state of the art
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:7:y:1998:i:1:p:17-30 [Citation Analysis]
2
1995On the importance of regional innovation flows in the European Union: some methodological issues in the Italian case
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:3:p:189-206 [Citation Analysis]
2
2007What drives the emergence of entrepreneurial academics? A study on collaborative research partnerships in the UK
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:257-270 [Citation Analysis]
2
2006Web indicators for complex innovation systems
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:85-95 [Citation Analysis]
2
2004What is the value of replicating other studies?
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:13:y:2004:i:3:p:189-195 [Citation Analysis]
1
2007The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:1:p:3-12 [Citation Analysis]
1
1991Monitoring science-based biotechnology by means of patent indicators
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:1:y:1991:i:2:p:61-68 [Citation Analysis]
1
2006Conclave in the Tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:15:y:2006:i:1:p:57-68 [Citation Analysis]
1
2000Government-sponsored industry-university cooperative research: an analysis of cooperative research center evaluation approaches
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:1:p:57-67 [Citation Analysis]
1
2008Faculty publication productivity, collaboration, and grants velocity: using curricula vitae to compare center-affiliated and unaffiliated scientists
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:17:y:2008:i:2:p:103-110 [Citation Analysis]
1
1995France, the guarantor model and the institutionalisation of evaluation
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:1:p:11-21 [Citation Analysis]
1
2004Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of federally funded research in the United States
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:13:y:2004:i:2:p:76-86 [Citation Analysis]
1
2006University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:15:y:2006:i:3:p:197-207 [Citation Analysis]
1
2000Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:3:p:183-187 [Citation Analysis]
1
1991Citation indicators and peer review: their time-scales, criteria of evaluation, and biases
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:1:y:1991:i:1:p:21-30 [Citation Analysis]
1
2003The link between firm-level innovation and aggregate productivity growth: a cross-country examination
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:131-147 [Citation Analysis]
1
2005German medical faculties in the 1990s: on-line bibliometric analysis
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:2:p:157-164 [Citation Analysis]
1
1999Assessing benefits from health research projects: can we use questionnaires instead of case studies?
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:3:p:189-199 [Citation Analysis]
1
2004Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:13:y:2004:i:2:p:129-140 [Citation Analysis]
1
1996Technology foresight: capturing the benefits from science-related technologies
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:6:y:1996:i:2:p:158-168 [Citation Analysis]
1
2000First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:155-156 [Citation Analysis]
1
2008The impact of EU-funded research networks on knowledge diffusion at the regional level
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:17:y:2008:i:4:p:283-293 [Citation Analysis]
1
2003Patterns of technological activities of transnational corporations affiliates in Brazil
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:117-129 [Citation Analysis]
1
2005Key labs and open labs in the Chinese scientific research system: qualitative and quantitative evaluation indicators
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:2:p:103-109 [Citation Analysis]
1
1999Scientific collaboration of the Mercosur countries as an indicator of Latin American regional activity
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:2:p:83-90 [Citation Analysis]
1
2011The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘impact agenda’: are we creating a Frankenstein monster?
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:3:p:247-254 [Citation Analysis]
1
2004Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:13:y:2004:i:1:p:33-41 [Citation Analysis]
1
2000360 degree linkage analysis
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:133-143 [Citation Analysis]
1
2008Assessing the contribution of impact assessment to donor decisions for international agricultural research
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:17:y:2008:i:3:p:187-199 [Citation Analysis]
1
2003Linking research production and development outcomes at the regional level
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:105-116 [Citation Analysis]
1
1995Changes in Latvias science indicators in the transformation period
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:2:p:151-160 [Citation Analysis]
1
2005Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:1:p:70-79 [Citation Analysis]
1
1998Evaluation of research and technological development programmes: a tool for policy design
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:7:y:1998:i:2:p:93-97 [Citation Analysis]
1
2007Indicators on individual higher education institutions: addressing data problems and comparability issues
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:66-78 [Citation Analysis]
1
2001Evolution of specialisation: public research in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:10:y:2001:i:1:p:67-79 [Citation Analysis]
1
2011Evaluation of firm R&D and innovation support: new indicators and the ex-ante prediction of ex-post additionality
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:1:p:19-29 [Citation Analysis]
1
2003Characteristics of highly cited papers
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:159-170 [Citation Analysis]
1

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:
YearTitleSee

Cites in year: CiY

Recent citations received in: 2011

YearTitleSee

Recent citations received in: 2008

YearTitleSee

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.

Hosted by Valencian Economic Research Institute ©2013 Jose Manuel Barrueco | mail: barrueco@uv.es