Last updated July, 3 2014 639.049 documents processed, 16.613.935 references and 6.218.529 citations

FZG Discussion Papers / Research Center for Generational Contracts (FZG), University of Freiburg


[Raw data] [Main indicators] [Most cited papers] [cites used to compute the impact factor] [Recent citations ][documents published in EconPapers] [Keep updated about new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators


Raw data:


IF AIF DOC CDO CCU CIF CIT D2Y C2Y %SC CiY II AII
19900.09000000.04
19910.09000000.05
19920.09000000.06
19930.1000000.05
19940.12000000.05
19950.16000000.09
19960.2000000.09
19970.2000000.08
19980.22000000.12
19990.27000000.15
20000.37000000.14
20010.38000000.17
20020.39000000.19
20030.42000000.19
20040.43000000.19
20050.453300000.23
20060.464700300.2
20070.431003700.17
20080.140.461620.1337110010.170.18
20090.330.3762230.141931000.18
20100.080.3372920.073121010.140.16
20110.150.4513020.07013200.22
20120.4823210.031800.24
20130.330.5423410.0303100.26
20140.2313500400.17
 
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF: Cumulative impact factor
CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
%SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

 

Most cited documents in this series:


YearTitleCited
2007Die Generationenbilanz - Brandmelder der Zukunft, Update 2007: Demografie trifft Konjunktur. (2007). Raffelhuschen, Bernd ; Heidler, Matthias ; Schoder, Jorg ; Hagist, Christian . In: FZG Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:fzgdps:17.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3
2008Pflege im Spannungsfeld von Angebot und Nachfrage. (2008). Moog, Stefan ; Hackmann, Tobias . In: FZG Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:fzgdps:33.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2010Der Rücklagenbedarf der Versorgungsausgaben in Baden-Württemberg: Projektion und Reformoptionen. (2010). Hagist, Christian ; Benz, Tobias . In: FZG Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:fzgdps:42.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2009Ehrbare Staaten? Die Ergebnisse der Generationenbilanzierung im internationalen Vergleich. (2009). Raffelhuschen, Bernd ; Moog, Stefan ; Vatter, Johannes ; Hagist, Christian . In: FZG Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:fzgdps:34.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2012Well-being in Germany: What explains the regional variation?. (2012). Vatter, Johannes . In: FZG Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:fzgdps:50.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2010A fiscal outlook for Poland using generational accounts. (2010). Raffelhuschen, Bernd ; Jabonowski, Janusz ; Muller, Christoph . In: FZG Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:fzgdps:47.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2008Älter gleich kränker? Auswirkungen des Zugewinns an Lebenserwartung auf die Pflegewahrscheinlichkeit. (2008). Moog, Stefan ; Hackmann, Tobias . In: FZG Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:fzgdps:26.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2010Ehrbare Staaten? Die deutsche Generationenbilanz im internationalen Vergleich: Wie gut ist Deutschland auf die demografische Herausforderung vorbereitet?. (2010). Raffelhuschen, Bernd ; Moog, Stefan ; Muller, Christoph . In: FZG Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:fzgdps:44.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:


YearTitleSee

Cites in year: CiY


Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.