Johannes Lohse : Citation Profile


Are you Johannes Lohse?

University of Birmingham

4

H index

2

i10 index

49

Citations

RESEARCH PRODUCTION:

7

Articles

14

Papers

RESEARCH ACTIVITY:

   6 years (2014 - 2020). See details.
   Cites by year: 8
   Journals where Johannes Lohse has often published
   Relations with other researchers
   Recent citing documents: 15.    Total self citations: 8 (14.04 %)

MORE DETAILS IN:
ABOUT THIS REPORT:

   Permalink: http://citec.repec.org/plo373
   Updated: 2020-09-26    RAS profile: 2020-05-21    
   Missing citations? Add them    Incorrect content? Let us know

Relations with other researchers


Works with:

Goeschl, Timo (12)

Kesternich, Martin (6)

Reif, Christiane (3)

Schwieren, Christiane (3)

Authors registered in RePEc who have co-authored more than one work in the last five years with Johannes Lohse.

Is cited by:

Wollbrant, Conny (4)

Smith, John (2)

CHANEL, Olivier (2)

Shupp, Robert (2)

Martinsson, Peter (2)

Fromell, Hanna (2)

Nosenzo, Daniele (2)

Sonntag, Axel (2)

Kesternich, Martin (2)

Rübbelke, Dirk (2)

Vesterlund, Lise (2)

Cites to:

List, John (39)

Falk, Armin (23)

Eckel, Catherine (18)

Fischbacher, Urs (17)

Andreoni, James (17)

Croson, Rachel (16)

Fehr, Ernst (15)

Löschel, Andreas (15)

Goeschl, Timo (14)

grossman, philip (13)

Johansson-Stenman, Olof (12)

Main data


Where Johannes Lohse has published?


Working Papers Series with more than one paper published# docs
Working Papers / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics7
ZEW Discussion Papers / ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research2
Discussion Papers / Department of Economics, University of Birmingham2

Recent works citing Johannes Lohse (2020 and 2019)


YearTitle of citing document
2019Do injunctive or descriptive social norms elicited using coordination games better explain social preferences?. (2019). Schmidt, Robert J. In: Working Papers. RePEc:awi:wpaper:0668.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The Creation of Social Norms under Weak Institutions. (2020). Waichman, Israel ; Diekert, Florian ; Luomba, Joseph ; Eymess, Tillmann. In: Working Papers. RePEc:awi:wpaper:0684.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Why are smarter individuals more prosocial? A study on the mediating roles of empathy and moral identity. (2019). Sun, Peng ; Guo, Qingke ; Song, Kexin ; Zhang, Xiling ; Cai, Minghang. In: Intelligence. RePEc:eee:intell:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:1-8.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study. (2019). Galizzi, Matteo ; Navarro-Martinez, Daniel. In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics. RePEc:ehl:lserod:84088.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Do parents invest into voluntary climate action when their children are watching? Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment. (2020). Hauser, Oliver P ; Fornwagner, Helena. In: Working Papers. RePEc:inn:wpaper:2020-23.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Cognitive processes underlying distributional preferences: a response time study. (2020). Fischbacher, Urs ; Chen, Fadong . In: Experimental Economics. RePEc:kap:expeco:v:23:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-019-09618-x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Intuitive Prosociality: Heterogeneous Treatment Effects or False Positive?. (2019). Torsvik, Gaute ; Stromland, Eirik. In: OSF Preprints. RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hrx2y.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Water demand management: Visualising a public good. (2020). Ueda, Kazuhiro ; Honda, Hidehito ; Otaki, Yurina. In: PLOS ONE. RePEc:plo:pone00:0234621.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Focality is intuitive - Experimental evidence on the effects of time pressure in coordination games. (2019). Poulsen, Anders ; Sonntag, Axel. In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:92262.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Do economic preferences predict pro-environmental behaviour?. (2020). Weber, Till O ; Laffan, Kate ; Lades, Leonhard K. In: Working Papers. RePEc:ucd:wpaper:202003.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Focality is Intuitive - Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Time Pressure in Coordination Games. (2019). Sonntag, Axel ; Poulsen, Anders. In: Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS). RePEc:uea:wcbess:19-01.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Some Experimental Evidence on Type Stability and Response Times.. (2019). Lotito, Gianna ; Ortona, Guido ; Migheli, Matteo. In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers. RePEc:uto:dipeco:201919.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019How Time Constraint Affects the Disposition Effect?. (2019). Niu, Xiaofei ; Li, Jianbiao. In: EconStor Preprints. RePEc:zbw:esprep:194618.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nation-wide field experiment on Facebook. (2020). Hager, Anselm ; Adena, Maja. In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change. RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Works by Johannes Lohse:


YearTitleTypeCited
2014Giving is a question of time: Response times and contributions to a real world public good In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper11
2014Smart or Selfish - When Smart Guys Finish Nice In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper14
2016Smart or selfish – When smart guys finish nice.(2016) In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 14
article
2015What do we learn from public good games about voluntary climate action? Evidence from an artefactual field experiment In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper1
2016Cooperation in Public Good Games. Calculated or Confused? In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0
2018Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?.(2018) In: European Economic Review.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 0
article
2016Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for the role of subjective utility differences under time pressure In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper4
2017Leveling up? An inter-neighborhood experiment on parochialism and the efficiency of multi-level public goods provision In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper3
2019Leveling up? An inter-neighborhood experiment on parochialism and the efficiency of multi-level public goods provision.(2019) In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 3
article
2017Leveling up? An inter-neighborhood experiment on parochialism and the efficiency of multi-level public goods provision.(2017) In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 3
paper
2018Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper5
2019Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure.(2019) In: Experimental Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 5
article
2019Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and splillovers In: Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper1
2019Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers.(2019) In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 1
paper
2020Cognitive abilities and risk taking: the role of preferences In: Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0
2020How much can we learn about voluntary climate action from behavior in public goods games? In: Ecological Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article2
2018From Social Information to Social Norms: Evidence from Two Experiments on Donation Behaviour In: Games.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article2
2020Active and Passive Risk-Taking In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0
2017Giving is a Question of Time: Response Times and Contributions to an Environmental Public Good In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
article6
2015Cooperation at a discount - Will I give away your money? In: Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0
2016An online experiment on cooperation and groupishness across urban districts In: Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
paper0

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated July, 2 2020. Contact: CitEc Team