Sander Onderstal : Citation Profile

Are you Sander Onderstal?

Universiteit van Amsterdam (99% share)
Tinbergen Instituut (1% share)

9

H index

8

i10 index

347

Citations

RESEARCH PRODUCTION:

19

Articles

46

Papers

RESEARCH ACTIVITY:

   17 years (2002 - 2019). See details.
   Cites by year: 20
   Journals where Sander Onderstal has often published
   Relations with other researchers
   Recent citing documents: 44.    Total self citations: 26 (6.97 %)

MORE DETAILS IN:
ABOUT THIS REPORT:

   Permalink: http://citec.repec.org/pon19
   Updated: 2020-05-23    RAS profile: 2020-04-30    
   Missing citations? Add them    Incorrect content? Let us know

Relations with other researchers

Works with:

Praag, Mirjam (3)

Sloof, Randolph (3)

Hinloopen, Jeroen (2)

Schram, Arthur (2)

Sonnemans, Joep (2)

Bos, Olivier (2)

Seldeslachts, Jo (2)

Gomez-Martinez, Francisco (2)

Authors registered in RePEc who have co-authored more than one work in the last five years with Sander Onderstal.

Is cited by:

Bos, Olivier (21)

Faravelli, Marco (19)

Carpenter, Jeffrey (18)

Stanca, Luca (18)

Matthews, Peter (17)

Bartling, Björn (15)

Netzer, Nick (15)

Price, Michael (11)

List, John (10)

Lu, Jingfeng (9)

Gomez-Martinez, Francisco (9)

Cites to:

Klemperer, Paul (39)

Sobel, Joel (28)

van Damme, Eric (24)

Blume, Andreas (24)

List, John (22)

Fehr, Ernst (21)

Goeree, Jacob (19)

Schmidt, Klaus (18)

Potters, Jan (17)

Cramton, Peter (16)

gneezy, uri (15)

Main data

Where Sander Onderstal has published?

Journals with more than one article published# docs
European Economic Review3
International Journal of Industrial Organization2
De Economist2
Journal of Public Economics2

Working Papers Series with more than one paper published# docs
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers / Tinbergen Institute23
CESifo Working Paper Series / CESifo Group Munich2
Working Papers / Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei2

Recent works citing Sander Onderstal (2020 and 2019)

YearTitle of citing document
2018Donors Change Both Their Level and Pattern of Giving in Response to Contests among Charities. (2018). Murphy, James ; Deck, Cary. In: Working Papers. RePEc:ala:wpaper:2018-06.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give.. (2019). Murphy, James ; List, John ; James, Alexander ; Price, Michael. In: Working Papers. RePEc:ala:wpaper:2019-07.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018PRIZE‐BASED MECHANISMS FOR FUND‐RAISING: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS. (2018). Peeters, Ronald ; Damianov, Damian S. In: Economic Inquiry. RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:56:y:2018:i:3:p:1562-1584.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Communication and Market Sharing: An Experiment on the Exchange of Soft and Hard Information. (2019). Thöni, Christian ; Thoni, Christian ; Roux, Catherine ; Freitag, Andreas. In: Working papers. RePEc:bsl:wpaper:2019/23.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018Do Fixed-Prize Lotteries Crowd Out Public Good Contributions Driven by Social Preferences?. (2018). Miklanek, Tomas ; Katuscak, Peter. In: CERGE-EI Working Papers. RePEc:cer:papers:wp617.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018Trust and Delegated Investing: A Money Doctors Experiment. (2018). Weber, Martin ; Loos, Benjamin ; Germann, Maximilian. In: CEPR Discussion Papers. RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12984.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019The Effect of a Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with Open Communication. (2019). Friedrichsen, Jana ; Bruttel, Lisa ; Andres, Maximilian. In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin. RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1835.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Donors change both their level and pattern of giving in response to contests among charities. (2019). Deck, Cary ; Murphy, James J. In: European Economic Review. RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:112:y:2019:i:c:p:91-106.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Whistleblowing and diffusion of responsibility: An experiment. (2019). Horvath, Gergely ; Nitta, Kohei ; Grimm, Veronika ; Choo, Lawrence. In: European Economic Review. RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:119:y:2019:i:c:p:287-301.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Donation-based crowdfunding with refund bonuses. (2019). Cason, Timothy ; Zubrickas, Robertas. In: European Economic Review. RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:119:y:2019:i:c:p:452-471.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018Collusion through communication in auctions. (2018). Agranov, Marina ; Yariv, Leeat. In: Games and Economic Behavior. RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:107:y:2018:i:c:p:93-108.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019How to choose your victim. (2019). Doan, Gonul ; Abbink, Klaus. In: Games and Economic Behavior. RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:113:y:2019:i:c:p:482-496.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020The effect of collusion on efficiency in experimental auctions. (2020). Seres, Gyula ; Noussair, Charles. In: Games and Economic Behavior. RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:119:y:2020:i:c:p:267-287.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018When words are not enough. (2018). Karamychev, Vladimir ; Swank, Otto H ; Bijkerk, Suzanne H. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:294-314.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Auctions with limited liability through default or resale. (2019). Saral, Krista ; Pagnozzi, Marco. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:159:y:2019:i:c:p:51-74.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Is Ignorance Bliss?. (2019). Yang, Yang. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:160:y:2019:i:c:p:68-82.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018Motivating emissions cleanup: Absolute vs. relative performance standards. (2018). Mullins, Jamie T. In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:66-92.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Preferences over income distribution: Evidence from a choice experiment. (2019). Verdier, Thierry ; Senik, Claudia ; Lobeck, Max ; Cetre, Sophie. In: Journal of Economic Psychology. RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:74:y:2019:i:c:s0167487019301084.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018The Binary Conditional Contribution Mechanism for public good provision in dynamic settings — Theory and experimental evidence. (2018). Oechssler, Jörg ; Reischmann, Andreas . In: Journal of Public Economics. RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:159:y:2018:i:c:p:104-115.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Does overconfidence promote cooperation? Theory and experimental evidence. (2019). Bao, Te ; Li, Jianbiao ; Yin, Xile. In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics). RePEc:eee:soceco:v:79:y:2019:i:c:p:119-133.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Loss aversion and sunk cost sensitivity in all-pay auctions for charity: Theory and experiments. (2020). Foster, Joshua. In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics). RePEc:eee:soceco:v:84:y:2020:i:c:s2214804319301831.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Train path congestion management: Using hybrid auctions for decentralized railway capacity allocation. (2019). Jankovi, Slaana ; Trifunovi, Dejan ; Bokovi, Branislav ; Stojadinovi, Nikola. In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. RePEc:eee:transa:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:123-139.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give.. (2019). Murphy, James ; List, John ; Price, Michael ; James, Alexander. In: Natural Field Experiments. RePEc:feb:natura:00682.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Can Rank-Order Competition Resolve the Free-Rider Problem in the Voluntary Provision of Impure Public Goods? Experimental Evidence. (2019). Servátka, Maroš ; Neugebauer, Tibor ; Angelovski, Andrej. In: Working Papers CESARE. RePEc:lui:cesare:1705.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Information Feedback in Relative Grading: Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2019). Suzuki, Shiba ; Morimoto, Keiichi ; Kajitani, Shinya . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:mei:wpaper:40.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Debarment and Collusion in Procurement Auctions. (2019). Cerrone, Claudia ; Hermstruwer, Author-Name Yoan. In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2018_05.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give.. (2019). Price, Michael ; Murphy, James ; List, John ; James, Alexander. In: NBER Working Papers. RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26559.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018How Social Preferences Influence the Stability of a Climate Coalition. (2018). Lin, Yu-Hsuan. In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:85428.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018A brief overview of approaches to defining social trust. (2018). Tamilina, Larysa. In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:96510.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018Theories of social trust formation: a brief literature overview. (2018). Tamilina, Larysa. In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:96511.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018The impact of welfare states on social trust: theoretical and empirical foundations. (2018). Tamilina, Larysa. In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:96512.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Two-worker competition in gift-exchange: assessing intention-based reciprocity and inequity aversion. (2020). Bogliacino, Francesco ; Gonzalez, Nicolas Rodriguez. In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:99055.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Donation-Based Crowdfunding with Refund Bonuses. (2019). Cason, Timothy ; Zubrickas, Robertas. In: Purdue University Economics Working Papers. RePEc:pur:prukra:1319.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018Auctions with Limited Liability through Default or Resale. (2018). Saral, Krista ; Pagnozzi, Marco. In: CSEF Working Papers. RePEc:sef:csefwp:494.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Heuristic and Equilibrium Strategies in Premium Auctions. (2019). Trifunovic, Dejan . In: Proceedings of International Academic Conferences. RePEc:sek:iacpro:9411761.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Social Responsibility and Firms Objectives. (2020). Fioretti, Michele. In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers. RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/7fsnj6af7v9ncrf76qn5p5on9e.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2020Social Responsibility and Firms Objectives. (2020). Fioretti, Michele. In: Sciences Po publications. RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7fsnj6af7v9ncrf76qn5p5on9e.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019Identification and Estimation in a Third-Price Auction Model. (2019). FLORENS, Jean-Pierre ; Enache, Andrea. In: TSE Working Papers. RePEc:tse:wpaper:26557.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018What Matters for Whistleblowing on Tax Evaders? Survey and Experimental Evidence. (2018). pavesi, filippo ; Corazzini, Luca ; Antinyan, Armenak. In: Working Papers. RePEc:ver:wpaper:07/2018.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018Why factors facilitating collusion may not predict cartel occurrence: Experimental evidence. (2018). Fonseca, Miguel ; Normann, Hans-Theo ; Li, Yan. In: DICE Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:dicedp:289.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2018Lets lock them in: Collusion under consumer switching costs. (2018). Fourberg, Niklas. In: DICE Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:dicedp:296.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019The effects of private damage claims on cartel stability: Experimental evidence. (2019). Schad, Jannika ; Normann, Hans-Theo ; Fremerey, Melinda ; Bodnar, Olivia. In: DICE Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:dicedp:315.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2019How the auction design influences procurement prices: An experiment. (2019). Ott, Marion ; Ehrhart, Karl-Martin. In: ZEW Discussion Papers. RePEc:zbw:zewdip:19061.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Works by Sander Onderstal:

YearTitleTypeCited
2019Trading places: An experimental comparison of reallocation mechanisms for priority queuing In: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article0
2015Trading Places: An Experimental Comparison of Reallocation Mechanisms for Priority Queuing.(2015) In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 0		paper
2006The Chopstick Auction: A Study of the Exposure Problem in Multi-Unit Auctions In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2018Signalling in Auctions: Experimental Evidence In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2004Auctioning incentive contracts; application to welfare-to-work programs In: CPB Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2006Team incentives in public organisations; an experimental study In: CPB Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2003Tight oligopolies: in search of proportionate remedies In: CPB Document.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2003Equal rules or equal opportunities? Demystifying level playing field In: CPB Document.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2004Better safe than sorry? Reliability policy in network industries In: CPB Document.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2015What Clients Want: Choices between Lawyers Offerings In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2014What Clients want: Choices between Lawyers Offerings.(2014) In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 0		paper
2009Bidding for the unemployed: An application of mechanism design to welfare-to-work programs In: European Economic Review.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article3
2014Going once, going twice, reported! Cartel activity and the effectiveness of antitrust policies in experimental auctions In: European Economic Review.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article12
2016Firm-specific information and explicit collusion in experimental oligopolies In: European Economic Review.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article11
2015Firm-Specific Information and Explicit Collusion in Experimental Oligopolies.(2015) In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 11		paper
2015Equilibrium selection in experimental cheap talk games In: Games and Economic Behavior.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article1
2015Equilibrium Selection in Experimental Cheap Talk Games.(2015) In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 1		paper
2009The chopstick auction: A study of the exposure problem in multi-unit auctions In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article9
2004The Chopstick Auction: A Study of the Exposure Problem in Multi-Unit Auctions.(2004) In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 9		paper
2011Fighting collusion in auctions: An experimental investigation In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article23
2016Inequity aversion revisited In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article9
2013Bidding to give in the field In: Journal of Public Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article15
2014Reprint of: Bidding to give in the field In: Journal of Public Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article0
2016Does Relative Grading Help Male Students? Evidence from a Field Experiment in the Classroom In: Framed Field Experiments.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper7
2014Does Relative Grading Help Male Students? Evidence from a Field Experiment in the Classroom.(2014) In: IZA Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 7		paper
2014Does Relative Grading help Male Students? Evidence from a Field Experiment in the Classroom.(2014) In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 7		paper
2003Auctions with Financial Externalities In: Working Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper36
2007Auctions with Financial Externalities.(2007) In: Economic Theory.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 36		article
2002Auctions with Financial Externalities.(2002) In: Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 36		paper
2011Self-selection and the Power of Incentive Schemes: An Experimental Study In: Post-Print.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2010Self-Selection and the Power of Incentive Schemes: An Experimental Study.(2010) In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 0		paper
2009BIDDING TO GIVE: AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF AUCTIONS FOR CHARITY In: International Economic Review.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article46
2014Solids: A Combinatorial Auction for Real Estate In: Interfaces.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article1
2006Going, Going, Gone! A Swift Tour of Auction Theory and its Applications In: De Economist.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article1
2006Going, Going, Gone! A Swift Tour of Auction Theory and Its Applications.(2006) In: De Economist.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 1		article
2014For those about to talk we salute you: an experimental study of credible deviations and ACDC In: Experimental Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article1
2009Seeking rents in the shadow of Coase In: Public Choice.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article6
2006Seeking Rents in the Shadow of Coase.(2006) In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 6		paper
2009The chopstick auction In: Munich Reprints in Economics.
[Citation analysis]		paper1
2002The Chopstick Auction.(2002) In: Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 1		paper
2012Self-selection and the power of incentive schemes: an experimental study In: Applied Economics.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article0
2013Going Once, Going Twice, Reported! In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2009Auctioning Incentive Contracts: An Experimental Study In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper2
2010Punching above Ones Weight: The Case against Election Campaigns In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2010The Trust Game behind the Veil of Ignorance: A Note on Gender Differences In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper16
2005The Trust Game Behind the Veil of Ignorance : A Note on Gender Differences.(2005) In: Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]
This paper has another version. Agregated cites: 16		paper
2013Collusion and the Choice of Auction: An Experimental Study In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper1
2011Inverse Adverse Selection: The Market for Gems In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper4
2011Keeping out Trojan Horses: Auctions and Bankruptcy in the Laboratory In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper2
2011Equilibrium Selection in Cheap Talk Games: ACDC rocks when Other Criteria remain silent In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper1
2011Power and the Privilege of Clarity: An Analysis of Bargaining Power and Information Transmission In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2011Bidding to give in the Field: Door-to-Door Fundraisers had it right from the Start In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper1
2011An Experimental Study of Credible Deviations and ACDC In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2017Premium Auctions in the Field In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper1
2017Signaling in Auctions: Experimental Evidence In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2019Cartel stability in experimental auctions In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2019Can Collusion Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from the Lab In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2020Cheap-talk Communication in Procurement Auctions: Theory and Experiment In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2002Socially Optimal Mechanisms In: Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2002Auctions for Extra Capacity in an Oligopolistic Market with Network Effects In: Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper1
2002The Effectiveness of Caps on Political Lobbying In: Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper5
2002Optimal Auctions with Financial Externalities In: Discussion Paper.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper1
2002Papers in auction theory In: Other publications TiSEM.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2016Inleiding: Academisch economieonderwijs na de crisis In: Other publications TiSEM.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		paper0
2005How (Not) to Raise Money In: Journal of Political Economy.
[Full Text][Citation analysis]		article130

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated May, 3 2020. Contact: CitEc Team