[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ] [more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
IF | AIF | CIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CIT | NCI | CCU | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | SC | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1991 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1992 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1993 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | |||||
1994 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
1995 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | |||||
1996 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.09 | |||||
1997 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.09 | |||||
1998 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | |||||
1999 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.13 | |||||
2000 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | |||||
2001 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.14 | |||||
2002 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.17 | |||||
2003 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
2004 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2005 | 0 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2006 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2007 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.17 | |||||
2008 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2009 | 0 | 0.49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2010 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.16 | |||||
2011 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2012 | 0 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2013 | 0 | 0.58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2014 | 0 | 0.58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2015 | 0 | 0.59 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
2016 | 0 | 0.64 | 0.05 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.19 | ||
2017 | 0 | 0.66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
2018 | 0.17 | 0.89 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.29 |
IF: | Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y |
AIF: | Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y |
CIF: | Cumulative impact factor |
IF5: | Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y |
DOC: | Number of documents published in year y |
CDO: | Cumulative number of documents published until year y |
CIT: | Number of citations to papers published in year y |
NCI: | Number of citations in year y |
CCU: | Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y |
D2Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
C2Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
D5Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
C5Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
SC: | selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
%SC: | Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
CiY: | Cites in year y to documents published in year y |
II: | Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. |
AII: | Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2016 | Comparative advantage of the EU in global value chains: How important and efficient are new EU members in transition?1. (2016). Lach, Åukasz ; Gurgul, Henryk. In: Managerial Economics. RePEc:exl:2manag:v:17:y:2016:i:1:p:21-58. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2 | 2016 | The logarithmic ACD model: The microstructure of the German and Polish stock markets1. (2016). Gurgul, Henryk ; Syrek, Robert. In: Managerial Economics. RePEc:exl:2manag:v:17:y:2016:i:1:p:77-92. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2016 | Comparative advantage of the EU in global value chains: How important and efficient are new EU members in transition?1. (2016). Lach, Åukasz ; Gurgul, Henryk. In: Managerial Economics. RePEc:exl:2manag:v:17:y:2016:i:1:p:21-58. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
Year | Title | |
---|---|---|
2018 | Updating Chinas input-output tables series using MTT method and its comparison. (2018). Zheng, Haitao ; Ren, Ruoen ; Jiang, Yunyun ; Wang, Cheng ; Fang, QI. In: Economic Modelling. RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:74:y:2018:i:c:p:186-193. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | |
2018 | On using dynamic IO models with layers of techniques to measure value added in global value chains. (2018). Gurgul, Henryk ; Lach, Ukasz. In: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. RePEc:eee:streco:v:47:y:2018:i:c:p:155-170. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
Year | Citing document | |
---|---|---|
2016 | Price duration versus trading volume in high-frequency data for selected DAX companies. (2016). Gurgul, Henryk ; Mitterer, Christoph ; Syrek, Robert. In: Managerial Economics. RePEc:exl:2manag:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:241-260. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |