home      Information for:  researchers | archive maintainers        warning
 Updated May, 1 2008 147.392 documents processed, 3.154.300 references and 1.403.701 citations

 

 
 

Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Latest citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII
19960.750.1629434333.350.170.07
19970.240.1744843385040.090.09
19980.210.1950133731560150.30.12
19990.240.295096942360.990.180.19
20000.310.3950931003164.560.120.2
20010.180.3447861001866.780.170.18
20020.330.395384973256.380.150.2
20030.220.4114141002222.720.140.21
 
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
 
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
 
Impact Factor:
 
Immediacy Index:
 
Documents published:
 
Citations received:
 

 

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-97-18-rev When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets (1997). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 35 times.

(2) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-22 Rebating Environmental Policy Revenues: Output-Based Allocations and Tradable Performance Standards (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 22 times.

(3) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-22 The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 22 times.

(4) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-30- The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emission Trading (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 20 times.

(5) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-04-54 Environmental Economics (0000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 20 times.

(6) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-02-42 Projecting Productivity Growth: Lessons from the U.S. Growth Resurgence (2002). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 17 times.

(7) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-02 Prices vs. Quantities Revisited: The Case of Climate Change (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 17 times.

(8) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-99-04 Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection When Technological Innovation is Endogenous (1999). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 15 times.

(9) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-34 Tradable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to Auction Not Grandfather (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 14 times.

(10) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-02-15- The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances (2002). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 14 times.

(11) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-99-20 Read This Paper Even Later: Procrastination with Time-Inconsistent Preferences (1999). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 12 times.

(12) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-47 Technological Change and the Environment (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 12 times.

(13) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-03-32 Combining Rate-Based and Cap-and-Trade Emissions Policies (0000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 12 times.

(14) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-02-12- Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax? (2002). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 11 times.

(15) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-55-rev Cost-Effective Reduction of NOx Emissions from Electricity Generation (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 11 times.

(16) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-97-31-rev The Costs and Benefits of Reducing Acid Rain (1997). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 10 times.

(17) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-96-30 The Social Cost of Electricity: Do the Numbers Add Up? (1996). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 10 times.

(18) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-14 Policy-Induced Technology Adoption: Evidence from the U.S. Lead Phasedown (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 9 times.

(19) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-04 Pollution Regulation and the Efficiency Gains from Technological Innovation (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 9 times.

(20) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-95-30-rev Cost Savings sans Allowance Trades? Evaluating the SO2 Emission Trading Program to Date (1995). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 8 times.

(21) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-99-18 On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates (1999). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 8 times.

(22) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-99-10-rev Regulating Stock Externalities Under Uncertainty (1999). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 8 times.

(23) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-43 Accumulative Pollution, Clean Technology, and Policy Design (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 8 times.

(24) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-31- Is There a Rationale for Rebating Environmental Levies? (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 8 times.

(25) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-02-11- The Effects of Potential Land Development on Agricultural Land Prices (2002). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 8 times.

(26) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-38 Innovation Under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 7 times.

(27) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-97-25 The Positive Political Economy of Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy (1997). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 7 times.

(28) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-54 A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 7 times.

(29) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-02-68 Prospects for Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies (2002). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 6 times.

(30) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-27 Overcoming Public Aversion to Congestion Pricing (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 6 times.

(31) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-48 Policy Analysis in a Second-Best World (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 6 times.

(32) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-97-17 Optimal Choice of Policy Instrument and Stringency Under Uncertainty: The Case of Climate Change (1997). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 6 times.

(33) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-26 Market-Based Environmental Policies (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 6 times.

(34) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-15 Pollution Control in the Informal Sector: The Ciudad Juárez Brickmakers Project (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 6 times.

(35) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-99-28 Winner, Loser, or Innocent Victim? Has Renewable Energy Performed As Expected? (1999). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(36) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-25 Allocation of CO2 Emissions Allowances in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program (0000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(37) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-96-27 Valuation of Biodiversity for Use in New Product Research in a Model of Sequential Search (1996). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(38) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-99-39 The Use of Economic Incentives in Developing Countries: Lessons from International Experience with Industrial Air Pollution (1999). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(39) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-01 Cost-Effectiveness of Renewable Electricity Policies (0000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(40) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-10-rev Restructuring and Cost of Reducing NOx Emissions in Electricity Generation (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(41) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-37 Age, Health, and the Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reductions: A Contingent Valuation Survey of Ontario Residents (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(42) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-06-37 Congestion Pricing: Long-Term Economic and Land-Use Effects (2006). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(43) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-98-19-rev Getting on the Map: The Political Economy of State-Level Electricity Restructuring (1998). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(44) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-95-37 Temporal Reliability of Estimates from Contingent Valuation (1995). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(45) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-02 The Case for Intensity Targets (0000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(46) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-96-35 The Cost of Reducing Municipal Solid Waste (1996). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(47) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-18 Cost-Effective NOx Control in the Eastern United States (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(48) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-99-19 Read This Paper Later: Procrastination with Time-Consistent Preferences (1999). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(49) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-55 The Political Economy of Environmental Policy (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 5 times.

(50) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-96-03 Environmental Taxes: Dead or Alive? (1996). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers
Cited: 4 times.

Latest citations received in: | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000

Latest citations received in: 2003

(1) RePEc:cdl:agrebk:939 Does Community Involvement Matter? How Collective Choice Affects Forests in Mexico. (2003). Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley / Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series

(2) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-03-08 How Well Can Markets for Development Rights Work? Evaluating a Farmland Preservation Program (2003). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

Latest citations received in: 2002

(1) RePEc:aea:jecper:v:16:y:2002:i:2:p:3-22 Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: The New Economy: Post Mortem or Second Wind'DONE' (2002). Journal of Economic Perspectives

(2) RePEc:fce:doctra:0208 The Aftermath of the New Economy Bust : a Case Study of Five OECD Countries (2002). Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE) / Documents de Travail de l'OFCE

(3) RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2002-29 Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going? (2002). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) / Finance and Economics Discussion Series

(4) RePEc:nbr:nberwo:9034 Stock Market Boom and the Productivity Gains of the 1990s (2002). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc / NBER Working Papers

(5) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-02-09- Green Price Indices (2002). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(6) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-02-10- Quality Adjustment for Spatially-Delineated Public Goods: Theory and Application to Cost-of-Living Indices in Los Angeles (2002). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(7) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-02-47 Adjusting Carbon Cost Analyses to Account for Prior Tax Distortions (2002). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(8) RePEc:rif:dpaper:827 The Production and Use of ICT in Finland (2002). The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy / Discussion Papers

Latest citations received in: 2001

(1) RePEc:ias:cpaper:01-wp269 Optimal Antibiotic Usage with Resistance and Endogenous Technological Change (2001). Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University / Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications

(2) RePEc:isu:genres:1942 Optimal Antibiotic Usage with Resistance and Endogenous Technological Change (2001). Iowa State University, Department of Economics / Staff General Research Papers

(3) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-22 Rebating Environmental Policy Revenues: Output-Based Allocations and Tradable Performance Standards (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(4) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-30- The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emission Trading (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(5) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-31- Is There a Rationale for Rebating Environmental Levies? (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(6) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-54 A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(7) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-61- Ancillary Benefits of Reduced Air Pollution in the United States from Moderate Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies in the Electricity Sector (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(8) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-01-62- Implementing Electricity Restructuring: Policies, Potholes, and Prospects (2001). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

Latest citations received in: 2000

(1) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-15-rev How Large Are the Welfare Gains from Technological Innovation Induced by Environmental Policies? (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(2) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-16 Can Power from Space Compete? (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(3) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-34 The Impacts of Marine Reserves on Limited-Entry Fisheries (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(4) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-38 Innovation Under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Program in the U.S. Electricity Sector (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(5) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-46 The Benefits and Costs of Informal Sector Pollution Control: Mexican Brick Kilns (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

(6) RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-00-55-rev Cost-Effective Reduction of NOx Emissions from Electricity Generation (2000). Resources For the Future / Discussion Papers

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.

©2008 Jose Manuel Barrueco | mail: barrueco@uv.es