Aarhus School of Business, Department of Organisation and Management / Working Papers

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Latest citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII 1996 0.16 0 0 0 0.07 1997 0.17 0 0 0 0.09 1998 0.19 0 0 0 0.12 1999 0.29 0 0 0 0.19 2000 0.39 3 2 0 0 0.2 2001 0.34 5 2 3 0 2 0.4 0.18 2002 0.39 1 0 8 0 0.2 2003 0.41 11 0 6 0 0.21 2004 0.47 17 0 12 0 0.25 2005 0.45 13 0 28 0 0.29
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.   AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
Impact Factor:
Immediacy Index:
Documents published:
Citations received:

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:hhb:aardom:2000_001 The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition - Does the sailing ship effect exist? (2000).
Cited: 2 times.

(2) RePEc:hhb:aardom:2001_001 Trends and patterns in contemporary management in smaller companies: The Danish Perspective (2001).
Cited: 2 times.

(3) RePEc:hhb:aardom:2001_004 Gender Differences and Informal Networks in a Scandinavian Context (2001).
Cited: 1 times.

(4) RePEc:hhb:aardom:2006_005 MBTI - distorted reflections of personality? (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(5) RePEc:hhb:aardom:2001_002 Informal Networks in Organizations - A literature review (2001).
Cited: 1 times.

Latest citations received in: | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002

Latest citations received in: 2005

Latest citations received in: 2004

Latest citations received in: 2003

Latest citations received in: 2002

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.