International Productivity Monitor

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII 1996 0.17 0 0 0 0.08 1997 0.2 0 0 0 0.08 1998 0.23 0 0 0 0.1 1999 0.31 0 0 0 0.15 2000 0.43 9 15 0 0 1 0.11 0.19 2001 0.44 0.4 14 29 9 4 25 1 0.07 0.17 2002 0.3 0.43 13 18 23 7 85.7 0.2 2003 0.52 0.48 17 27 27 14 28.6 5 0.29 0.22 2004 0.43 0.52 16 19 30 13 30.8 5 0.31 0.23 2005 0.27 0.59 15 7 33 9 33.3 2 0.13 0.27 2006 0.19 0.63 14 8 31 6 0 1 0.07 0.27
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.   AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
Impact Factor:	Immediacy Index:
Documents published:	Citations received:

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:14:y:2007:5 EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: An Overview (2007).
Cited: 28 times.

(2) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:2:y:2001:5 The OECD Productivity Manual: A Guide to the Measurement of Industry-Level and Aggregate Productivity (2001).
Cited: 17 times.

(3) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:1 The Widening Canada-US Productivity Gap in Manufaturing (2002).
Cited: 9 times.

(4) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:5 The Effect of Adjustment Costs and Organizational Change on Productivity in Canada: Evidence from Aggregate Data (2004).
Cited: 8 times.

(5) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:1:y:2000:6 What Does Total Factor Productivity Measure? (2000).
Cited: 8 times.

(6) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:2 Why are Americans More Productive than Canadians? (2003).
Cited: 7 times.

(7) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:2:y:2001:2 The Importance of Innovation for Productivity (2001).
Cited: 5 times.

(8) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:2 Canadas Recent Productivity Record and Capital Accumulation (2003).
Cited: 5 times.

(9) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:12:y:2006:2 The Boskin Commission Report: A Retrospective One Decade Later (2006).
Cited: 4 times.

(10) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:5 The Contribution of ICT-Producing and ICT-Using Industries to Productivity Growth: A Comparison of Canada, Europe and the United States (2003).
Cited: 4 times.

(11) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:1:y:2000:7 Labour or Total Factor Productivity: Do We Need to Choose? (2000).
Cited: 4 times.

(12) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:4 Productivity and Policy Reform in Australia (2002).
Cited: 4 times.

(13) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:4:y:2002:2 The Importance of Skills for Innovation and Productivity (2002).
Cited: 4 times.

(14) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:3:y:2001:2 The Irish Economic Boom: What Can We Learn? (2001).
Cited: 4 times.

(15) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:1 The Growth Story: Canadas Long-run Economic Performance and Prospects (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(16) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:3 What Have Two Decades of British Economic Reform Delivered in Terms of Productivity Growth? (2002).
Cited: 3 times.

(17) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:2 Recent Productivity Developments in Canada and the United States: Productivity Growth Deceleration versus Acceleration (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(18) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:2 Ten Productivity Puzzles Facing Researchers (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(19) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:10:y:2005:4 Are Productivity Levels Higher in Some European Countries than in the United States? (2005).
Cited: 3 times.

(20) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:6 Future Productivity Growth in Canada: Comparing to the United States (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(21) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:5 Assessing Aggregate Labour Productivity Trends in Canada and the United States: Total Economy versus Business Sector Perspectives (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(22) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:1:y:2000:8 The Challenge of Total Factor Productivity (2000).
Cited: 3 times.

(23) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:4 Has Trend Productivity Growth Increased in Canada? (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(24) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:7 Future Productivity Growth in Canada: The Role of the Service Sector (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(25) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:6 The OECD Productivity Database: An Overview (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(26) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:3 Why Net Domestic Product Should Replace Gross Domestic Product as a Measure of Economic Growth (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(27) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:2:y:2001:4 Is IT Driving the U.S. Productivity Revival? (2001).
Cited: 2 times.

(28) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:8 The Source of Economic Growth in OECD Countries: A Review Article (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(29) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:3 Differences in Annual Work Hours per Capita between the United States and Canada (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(30) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:10:y:2005:1 An Analysis of the Labour Productivity Growth Slowdown in Canada since 2000 (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(31) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:1:y:2000:2 The Productivity Renaissance in the U.S. Service Sector (2000).
Cited: 2 times.

(32) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:1 Lessons for Canada from the U.S. Growth Resurgence (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(33) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:16:y:2008:3 What Is To Be Done for Better productivity Measurement (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(34) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:2:y:2001:3 Whats New About the New Economy? IT, Economic Growth and Productivity (2001).
Cited: 2 times.

(35) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:6 International Productivity Comparisons: An Examination of Data Sources (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(36) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:2 Raising Canadian Living Standards: A Framework for Analysis (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(37) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:1 Endogenous Growth, Productivity and Economic Policy: A Progress Report (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(38) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:1 Measuring the Canada-U.S. Productivity Gap: Industry Dimensions (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(39) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:13:y:2006:1 Benchmarking Canadas Economic Performance (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(40) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:4 The Effect of Organizational Innovation and Information and Communications Technology on Firm Performance (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(41) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:16:y:2008:1 Business Sector Productivity in Canada: What Do We Know? (2008).
Cited: 1 times.

(42) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:11:y:2005:2 Productivity and Building Human Capital for the Bottom Third (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(43) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:13:y:2006:4 Real GDP, Real GDI and Trading Gains: Canada, 1981-2005 (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(44) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:7 Productivity Growth in Services Industries: Is There a Role for Measurement? (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(45) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:13:y:2006:2 The Economists Manifesto for Curing Ailing Canadian Productivity (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(46) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:3:y:2001:7 Review Article on The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective by Angus Maddison (2001).
Cited: 1 times.

(47) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:12:y:2006:4 The Boskin Commission Report After a Decade (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(48) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:3 Challenges of the “New Economy” for Monetary Policy (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(49) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:11:y:2005:7 Progress in Service Sector Productivity Measurement: Review Article on Productivity in the U.S. Services Sector: New Sources of Economic Growth. (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(50) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:9:y:2004:3 The Link between Technology Use, Human Capital, Productivity and Wages: Firm-level Evidence (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

Recent citations received in: | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003

Recent citations received in: 2006

(1) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:12:y:2006:2 The Boskin Commission Report: A Retrospective One Decade Later (2006). International Productivity Monitor

Recent citations received in: 2005

(1) RePEc:pra:mprapa:7330 A comparison of structural productivity levels in the major industrialised countries (2005). University Library of Munich, Germany / MPRA Paper

(2) RePEc:sls:resrep:0506 What Explains the Canada-US ICT Investment Intensity Gap? (2005). Centre for the Study of Living Standards / CSLS Research Reports

Recent citations received in: 2004

(1) RePEc:imf:imfwpa:04/138 Economic Integration, Business Cycle, and Productivity in North America (2004). International Monetary Fund / IMF Working Papers

(2) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:2 Recent Productivity Developments in Canada and the United States: Productivity Growth Deceleration versus Acceleration (2004). International Productivity Monitor

(3) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:8:y:2004:5 Assessing Aggregate Labour Productivity Trends in Canada and the United States: Total Economy versus Business Sector Perspectives (2004). International Productivity Monitor

(4) RePEc:sls:resrep:0404 Aggregate Labour Productivity Growth in Canada and the United States: Definitions, Trends and Measurement Issues (2004). Centre for the Study of Living Standards / CSLS Research Reports

(5) RePEc:sls:resrep:0410 The McKinsey Global Institute Productivity Studies: Lessons for Canada (2004). Centre for the Study of Living Standards / CSLS Research Reports

Recent citations received in: 2003

(1) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:1 The Growth Story: Canadas Long-run Economic Performance and Prospects (2003). International Productivity Monitor

(2) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:2 Canadas Recent Productivity Record and Capital Accumulation (2003). International Productivity Monitor

(3) RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:5 A Perspective on Future Productivity Growth in Canada (2003). International Productivity Monitor

(4) RePEc:sls:resrep:0303 Why Are Americans More Productive Than Canadians? (2003). Centre for the Study of Living Standards / CSLS Research Reports

(5) RePEc:stc:stcp3e:2003209e Working Hours in Canada and the United States (2003). Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch / Analytical Studies Branch research paper series

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.