Defence and Peace Economics

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII 1996 0.17 0 0 0 0.08 1997 0.2 0 0 0 0.08 1998 0.23 0 0 0 0.1 1999 0.31 0 0 0 0.15 2000 0.43 0 0 0 0.19 2001 0.4 0 0 0 0.17 2002 0.43 34 39 0 0 7 0.21 0.2 2003 0.15 0.48 35 6 34 5 60 0.22 2004 0.06 0.52 33 10 69 4 50 1 0.03 0.23 2005 0.1 0.59 30 15 68 7 28.6 4 0.13 0.27 2006 0.08 0.63 38 5 63 5 40 0.27
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.   AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
Impact Factor:	Immediacy Index:
Documents published:	Citations received:

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:215-243 A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War (2002).
Cited: 9 times.

(2) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:85-107 Survey and Review of the Defense Economics Literature on Greece and Turkey: What Have We Learned? (2002).
Cited: 9 times.

(3) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:6:p:449-461 MODELS OF MILITARY EXPENDITURE AND GROWTH: A CRITICAL REVIEW (2005).
Cited: 6 times.

(4) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:485-496 BATTLEFIELDS AND MARKETPLACES (2002).
Cited: 4 times.

(5) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:4:p:271-286 OPTIMAL DEFENCE STRUCTURE FOR A SMALL COUNTRY (2002).
Cited: 3 times.

(6) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:121-128 The Demand for Turkish Defence Expenditure (2002).
Cited: 3 times.

(7) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:289-298 Does defence expenditure deter economic growth in Turkey? A cointegration analysis (2004).
Cited: 3 times.

(8) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:465-483 POLITICAL SYSTEMS, STABILITY AND CIVIL WARS (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(9) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:15:y:2004:i:1:p:71-82 A non-linear defence-growth nexus? evidence from the US economy (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(10) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:73-93 IN SEARCH OF THE AVERAGE TRANSNATIONAL TERRORIST ATTACK VENUE (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(11) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:435-450 AID, POLICY AND PEACE: REDUCING THE RISKS OF CIVIL CONFLICT (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(12) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:401-412 An intervention analysis of terrorism: the spanish eta case (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(13) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:385-403 BUDGETARY TRADE-OFFS OF SECURITY EXPENDITURES IN TURKEY (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(14) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:299-307 Defence Spending and Growth in Cyprus: A Causal Analysis (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(15) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:1-11 US Military Expenditures and Economic Growth: Some Evidence from Spectral Methods (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(16) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:107-115 THE FUTURE OF EUROPEAN DEFENCE POLICY: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(17) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:4:p:283-295 MILITARY EXPENDITURE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES: A DYNAMIC PANEL DATA ANALYSIS (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(18) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:187-197 Defense Spending and Economic Growth: Some Empirical Evidence from the Arab Gulf Region (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(19) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:19-27 Differing motivations for terrorism (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(20) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:5:p:331-346 ON THE USE OF TERROR WEAPONS VERSUS MODERN WEAPON SYSTEMS IN AN ARMS RACE BETWEEN DEVELOPED AND LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(21) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:205-219 Outsourcing Military Force: A Transactions Cost Perspective on the Role of Military Companies (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(22) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:17:y:2006:i:4:p:329-341 AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF TERRORISM: DEPRIVATION, ISLAMISM AND GEOPOLITICAL FACTORS (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(23) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:45-57 Defense spending and economic growth across the Taiwan straits: a threshold regression model (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(24) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:499-507 The matrix reloaded - what future for the defence firm? (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(25) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:55-60 Defense Spending Promotes Aggregate Output in the United States--Evidence from Cointegration Analysis (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(26) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:221-230 SUICIDAL TERRORISM AND DISCRIMINATORY SCREENING: AN EFFICIENCY-EQUITY TRADE-OFF (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(27) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:589-603 THE STABILITY OF ANARCHY AND BREAKDOWN OF PRODUCTION (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(28) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:59-66 The economic costs and benefits of UK defence exports: a comment (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(29) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:1-17 Military expenditure and debt in small industrialised economies: A panel analysis (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(30) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:177-199 DEFENSE R&D IN THE ANTI-TERRORIST ERA (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(31) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:451-464 CIVIL WARS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A REGIONAL COMPARISON (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(32) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:447-460 The demand for military spending in the peripheral economies of europe (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(33) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:37-45 ARMS RACE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE CASE OF INDIA AND PAKISTAN* (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(34) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:405-416 ASYMMETRIC EFFECTS OF MILITARY EXPENDITURE BETWEEN TURKEY AND GREECE (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(35) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:471-480 DO defence expenditures increase debt rescheduling in Turkey? probit model approach (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(36) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:13-30 Military Debt: Perspectives from the Experience of Arab Countries (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(37) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:129-139 MILITARY EXPENDITURE AND EMPLOYMENT IN TURKEY (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(38) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:365-383 DEFENCE R&D EXPENDITURE: THE CROWDING-OUT HYPOTHESIS (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(39) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:51-59 THE IMPACT OF DEFENCE SPENDING ON THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A CROSS-SECTION STUDY (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(40) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:4:p:275-282 ON RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY AND THE STUDY OF TERRORISM (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

Recent citations received in: | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003

Recent citations received in: 2006

Recent citations received in: 2005

(1) RePEc:fem:femwpa:2005.60 Impure Public Goods and Technological Interdependencies (2005). Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei / Working Papers

(2) RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:6:p:427-448 THE EFFECTS OF THE WORLD DEFENSE INDUSTRY AND US MILITARY AID TO ISRAEL ON THE ISRAELI DEFENSE INDUSTRY: A DIFFERENTIATED PRODUCTS MODEL (2005). Defence and Peace Economics

(3) RePEc:uwe:wpaper:0510 Military Spending and Economic Growth in Greece, Portugal and Spain (2005). University of the West of England, School of Economics / Discussion Papers

(4) RePEc:uwe:wpaper:0511 Manufacturing Growth, Technological Progress, and Military Expenditure (2005). University of the West of England, School of Economics / Discussion Papers

Recent citations received in: 2004

(1) RePEc:uwe:wpaper:0408 Models of Military Expenditure and Growth: A Critical Review (2004). University of the West of England, School of Economics / Discussion Papers

Recent citations received in: 2003

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.