The American Statistician

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII 1996 0.18 0 0 0 0.09 1997 0.21 0 0 0 0.08 1998 0.25 0 0 0 0.1 1999 0.32 0 0 0 0.15 2000 0.43 0 0 0 0.19 2001 0.41 57 18 0 0 1 0.02 0.17 2002 0.02 0.44 67 11 57 1 0 0.2 2003 0.02 0.47 73 14 124 3 0 1 0.01 0.22 2004 0.01 0.52 94 13 140 2 0 1 0.01 0.23 2005 0.05 0.56 79 6 167 8 0 1 0.01 0.25 2006 0.01 0.57 82 7 173 1 0 1 0.01 0.24 2007 0.01 0.48 104 5 161 2 0 0.22
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.   AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
Impact Factor:	Immediacy Index:
Documents published:	Citations received:

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:55:y:2001:m:august:p:244-254 Multiple Imputation in Practice: Comparison of Software Packages for Regression Models With Missing Variables (2001).
Cited: 7 times.

(2) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:58:y:2004:m:november:p:295-297 A (2004).
Cited: 5 times.

(3) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:55:y:2001:m:august:p:233-239 Graphical Assessment of Dependence: Is a Picture Worth 100 Tests? (2001).
Cited: 4 times.

(4) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:56:y:2002:m:august:p:196-201 On the Sensitivity of Bayes Factors to the Prior Distributions (2002).
Cited: 4 times.

(5) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:november:p:229-232 A Potential for Bias When Rounding in Multiple Imputation (2003).
Cited: 3 times.

(6) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:61:y:2007:m:february:p:79-90 Much Ado About Nothing: A Comparison of Missing Data Methods and Software to Fit Incomplete Data Regression Models (2007).
Cited: 3 times.

(7) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:november:p:253-253 Introduction (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(8) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:60:y:2006:m:august:p:241-250 Investigating Concurrency in Online Auctions Through Visualization (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(9) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:56:y:2002:m:may:p:90-99 The Standard Two-Sided Power Distribution and its Properties: With Applications in Financial Engineering (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(10) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:56:y:2002:m:august:p:235-246 An Examination of Statistical Software Packages for Categorical Data Analysis Using Exact Methods (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(11) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:59:y:2005:m:may:p:147-152 Heterogeneity and Causality: Unit Heterogeneity and Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(12) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:55:y:2001:m:may:p:89-95 A Note on the Estimation of the Multinomial Logit Model With Random Effects (2001).
Cited: 2 times.

(13) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:58:y:2004:m:august:p:179-185 Statistics and the College Football Championship (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(14) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:61:y:2007:m:august:p:262-268 The Numerical Reliability of GAUSS 8.0 (2007).
Cited: 2 times.

(15) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:56:y:2002:m:november:p:316-324 Corrgrams: Exploratory Displays for Correlation Matrices (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(16) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:november:p:241-248 A Penalized Maximum Likelihood Approach for the Ranking of College Football Teams Independent of Victory Margins (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(17) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:60:y:2006:m:august:p:224-232 A Framework for Evaluating the Utility of Data Altered to Protect Confidentiality (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(18) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:59:y:2005:m:may:p:153-155 How Surprising is a New Record? (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(19) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:august:p:201-213 An Examination of Statistical Software Packages for Categorical Data Analysis Using Exact Methods-Part II (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(20) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:60:y:2006:m:november:p:299-302 On The So-Called Huber-Sandwich Estimator and Robust Standard Errors (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(21) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:august:p:189-189 Introduction (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(22) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:58:y:2004:m:february:p:55-63 Assessing Assessments of School Performance: The Case of California (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(23) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:55:y:2001:m:august:p:200-202 Logit Confidence Intervals and the Inverse Sinh Transformation (2001).
Cited: 1 times.

(24) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:59:y:2005:m:may:p:156-161 A Bootstrap Test of Stochastic Equality of Two Populations (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(25) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:58:y:2004:m:august:p:218-223 Six Approaches to Calculating Standardized Logistic Regression Coefficients (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(26) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:62:y:2008:m:august:p:222-231 Propensity Score Matching: A Note of Caution for Evaluators of Social Programs (2008).
Cited: 1 times.

(27) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:55:y:2001:m:august:p:175-181 Finding Near-Optimal Bayesian Experimental Designs via Genetic Algorithms (2001).
Cited: 1 times.

(28) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:may:p:115-123 How Do Statisticians Perceive Statistics Journals? (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(29) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:august:p:190-192 Galtons Bend: A Previously Undiscovered Nonlinearity in Galtons Family Stature Regression Data (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(30) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:55:y:2001:m:february:p:19-24 The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis (2001).
Cited: 1 times.

(31) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:november:p:275-284 Detecting Dependence With Kendall Plots (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(32) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:60:y:2006:m:february:p:93-96 A Review of Scientific WorkPlace 5.5 (2006).
Cited: 1 times.

(33) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:58:y:2004:m:may:p:124-130 The Effect of Dependence on Confidence Intervals for a Population Proportion (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(34) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:56:y:2002:m:may:p:121-130 Lets Practice What We Preach: Turning Tables into Graphs (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(35) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:58:y:2004:m:february:p:38-45 Bowlers Hot Hands (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(36) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:62:y:2008:m:february:p:45-53 Univariate Distribution Relationships (2008).
Cited: 1 times.

(37) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:55:y:2001:m:august:p:187-193 Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination (2001).
Cited: 1 times.

(38) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:may:p:124-131 Local Versus Global Models for Classification Problems: Fitting Models Where it Matters (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(39) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:58:y:2004:m:august:p:202-202b Response (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(40) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:59:y:2005:m:february:p:41-46 Optimizing the Ordering of Tables With Evolutionary Computation (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(41) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:55:y:2001:m:february:p:25-34 Conditional Linear Mixed Models (2001).
Cited: 1 times.

(42) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:57:y:2003:m:november:p:285-288 A Graphical Tool for Assessing Normality (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(43) RePEc:bes:amstat:v:58:y:2004:m:november:p:280-289 Factors Relating to the Degree to Which Statistical Consulting Clients Deem Their Consulting Experiences to be a Success (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

Recent citations received in: | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

Recent citations received in: 2007

Recent citations received in: 2006

(1) RePEc:jss:jstsof:17:s01 Scientific Workplace 5.5 and LyX 1.4.2 (2006). Journal of Statistical Software

Recent citations received in: 2005

(1) RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:1:y:2005:i:1:n:4 A Procedure for Prediction of Sports Records (2005). Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

Recent citations received in: 2004

(1) RePEc:eea:boewps:wp2004-04 Hooverism, hyperstabilisation or halfway-house? describing fiscal policy in Estonia 1996-2003 (2004). Bank of Estonia / Bank of Estonia Working Papers

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.