The Field Experiments Website / Working Papers
Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series
  Most cited documents in this series: (1) RePEc:feb:wpaper:2096 Individual Risk Attitudes: New Evidence from a Large, Representative, Experimentally-Validated Survey (2005). Cited: 45 times. (2) RePEc:feb:wpaper:2082 Risk Pooling, Commitment and Information: An experimental test of two fundamental assumptions (2003). Cited: 8 times. (3) RePEc:feb:wpaper:2098 Subsidizing Charitable Contributions: A Field Test Comparing Matching and Rebate Subsidies (2005). Cited: 6 times. (4) RePEc:feb:wpaper:001 Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment (2006). Cited: 5 times. (5) RePEc:feb:wpaper:2102 Microfinance Games (2006). Cited: 5 times. (6) RePEc:feb:wpaper:2101 Emphatic Responsiveness: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment on Giving to Welfare Recipients (2004). Cited: 1 times. Recent citations received in: | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 Recent citations received in: 2007 Recent citations received in: 2006 (1) RePEc:feb:artefa:0063 Is Group Lending A Good Enforcement Scheme for Achieving High Repayment Rates? Evidence from Field Experiments in Vietnam (2006). The Field Experiments Website / Artefactual Field Experiments (2) RePEc:fip:fedbwp:06-18 Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run?: matching donations in a field experiment (2006). Federal Reserve Bank of Boston / Working Papers (3) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:13-22 Rebate subsidies, matching subsidies and isolation effects (2006). Judgment and Decision Making Recent citations received in: 2005 (1) RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11611 Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Charity: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2005). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc / NBER Working Papers Recent citations received in: 2004 Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|