Journal of Forest Economics

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII 1996 0.18 0 0 0 0.08 1997 0.22 0 0 0 0.09 1998 0.25 0 0 0 0.1 1999 0.31 0 0 0 0.15 2000 0.42 0 0 0 0.19 2001 0.41 0 0 0 0.16 2002 0.44 16 7 0 0 1 0.06 0.2 2003 0.46 16 4 16 0 0.21 2004 0.06 0.51 12 4 32 2 0 0.23 2005 0.54 18 3 28 0 0.24 2006 0.07 0.56 19 10 30 2 0 1 0.05 0.24 2007 0.05 0.45 21 8 37 2 0 1 0.05 0.21 2008 0.13 0.5 17 2 40 5 0 0.24
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.   AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
Impact Factor:	Immediacy Index:
Documents published:	Citations received:

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:12:y:2007:i:4:p:251-277 20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: A meta-analysis (2007).
Cited: 5 times.

(2) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:171-184 Does risk aversion accelerate optimal forest rotation under uncertainty? (2006).
Cited: 4 times.

(3) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:12:y:2006:i:1:p:5-30 A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions (2006).
Cited: 4 times.

(4) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:15:y:2009:i:1-2:p:59-78 Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Application to forest biodiversity (2009).
Cited: 4 times.

(5) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:9:y:2003:i:3:p:223-240 Preferences over the timing of forest resource use (2003).
Cited: 2 times.

(6) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:8:y:2002:i:2:p:151-166 Testing for market integration among southern pine regions (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(7) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:10:y:2004:i:2:p:75-96 Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products (2004).
Cited: 2 times.

(8) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:12:y:2006:i:1:p:75-81 A note on benefits and costs of adjusting forestry to meet recreational demands (2006).
Cited: 2 times.

(9) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:11:y:2005:i:3:p:177-199 Shades of Green: Measuring the value of urban forests in the housing market (2005).
Cited: 2 times.

(10) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:8:y:2002:i:2:p:105-117 Economic analysis of slash pine forest carbon sequestration in the southern U. S. (2002).
Cited: 2 times.

(11) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:10:y:2004:i:2:p:61-74 A comparison of a parametric and a non-parametric method to value a non-rejectable public good (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(12) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:8:y:2002:i:1:p:5-27 Forestrys golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(13) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:15:y:2009:i:1-2:p:109-130 A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe (2009).
Cited: 1 times.

(14) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:9:y:2003:i:1:p:5-25 Pollution abatement and productivity performance of regional Canadian pulp and paper industries (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(15) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:14:y:2008:i:1:p:5-27 Optimal location of new forests in a suburban region (2008).
Cited: 1 times.

(16) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:11:y:2005:i:3:p:125-140 Testing transferability of willingness to pay for forest fire prevention among three states of California, Florida and Montana (2005).
Cited: 1 times.

(17) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:13:y:2007:i:2-3:p:151-167 Economic lessons from control efforts for an invasive species: Miconia calvescens in Hawaii (2007).
Cited: 1 times.

(18) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:8:y:2002:i:1:p:77-99 Valuing high altitude spruce-fir forest improvements: importance of forest condition and recreation activity (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(19) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:9:y:2003:i:2:p:137-164 Econometric analyses of nonindustrial forest landowners: Is there anything left to study? (2003).
Cited: 1 times.

(20) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:14:y:2008:i:4:p:227-241 Revitalized? An event study of forest policy reform in British Columbia (2008).
Cited: 1 times.

(21) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:8:y:2002:i:3:p:185-197 Shadow pricing diversity in U. S. national forests (2002).
Cited: 1 times.

(22) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:13:y:2007:i:2-3:p:75-102 Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods (2007).
Cited: 1 times.

(23) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:10:y:2004:i:3:p:149-157 Do nearby forest fires cause a reduction in residential property values? (2004).
Cited: 1 times.

(24) RePEc:eee:foreco:v:13:y:2007:i:1:p:7-28 Heterogeneity in nonindustrial private roundwood supply: Lessons from a large panel of forest owners (2007).
Cited: 1 times.

Recent citations received in: | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005

Recent citations received in: 2008

Recent citations received in: 2007

(1) RePEc:pra:mprapa:11484 How Reliable are Meta-Analyses for International Benefit Transfers? (2007). University Library of Munich, Germany / MPRA Paper

Recent citations received in: 2006

(1) RePEc:ner:leuven:urn:hdl:123456789/119271 Optimal location of new forests in a suburban region. (2006). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven / Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Recent citations received in: 2005

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.