Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series
Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1996 | | 0.18 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1997 | | 0.18 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1998 | | 0.2 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.12 |
1999 | | 0.26 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2000 | | 0.36 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.17 |
2001 | | 0.35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.17 |
2002 | | 0.4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.19 |
2003 | 0.5 | 0.4 | | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.2 |
2004 | 2 | 0.44 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2005 | 2 | 0.46 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.27 |
2006 | 1.2 | 0.48 | 18 | 40 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0.17 | 0.24 |
2007 | 0.32 | 0.4 | 8 | 13 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
2008 | 0.46 | 0.4 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 12 | 25 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
2009 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 7 | 0 | 18 | 7 | 42.9 | | | 0.21 |
|   |
Impact Factor:
| Immediacy Index:
|
Documents published:
| Citations received:
|
  Most cited documents in this series: (1) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-07 When are Women More Generous than Men? (2006). Cited: 13 times. (2) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-23 Further Reflections on Prospect Theory (2005). Cited: 12 times. (3) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-03 Small- and Large-Stakes Risk Aversion: Implications of Concavity Calibration for Decision Theory (2006). Cited: 12 times. (4) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-09 Revealed Altruism (2007). Cited: 8 times. (5) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2008-10 The Today and Tomorrow of Kids (2008). Cited: 7 times. (6) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-13 Direct Tests of Models of Social Preferences and a New Model (2010). Cited: 6 times. (7) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-02 Barking Up the Right Tree: Are Small Groups Rational Agents? (2002). Cited: 5 times. (8) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-26 On Modeling Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods (2006). Cited: 5 times. (9) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-05 A Tractable Model of Reciprocity and Fairness (2006). Cited: 4 times. (10) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2010-08 Estimating Subjective Probabilities (2010). Cited: 4 times. (11) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2007-10 Discrimination in the Warplace: Evidence from a Civil War in Peru (2007). Cited: 4 times. (12) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-19 A computational electoral competition model with social clustering and endogenous interest groups as information brokers (2004). Cited: 3 times. (13) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2009-04 Risk Tolerance, Self-Interest, and Social Preferences (2011). Cited: 3 times. (14) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2007-05 Is There A Plausible Theory for Risky Decisions? (2008). Cited: 3 times. (15) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-21 Revealing Preferences for Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining (2005). Cited: 3 times. (16) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2008-01 Risky Decisions in the Large and in the Small: Theory and Experiment (2008). Cited: 3 times. (17) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2011-07 Paradoxes and Mechanisms for Choice under Risk (2011). Cited: 3 times. (18) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-17 Learning about Learning in Games through Experimental Control of Strategic Interdependence (2008). Cited: 2 times. (19) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-06 EconPort: Creating and Maintaining a Knowledge Commons (2006). Cited: 2 times. (20) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-20 Discrimination in the Lab: Experiments Exploring the Impact of Performance and Appearance on Sorting and Cooperation (2006). Cited: 2 times. (21) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-24 Pay One or Pay All: Random Selection of One Choice for Payment (2006). Cited: 2 times. (22) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2007-08 Trust and Reciprocity: Implications of Game Triads and Social Contexts (2008). Cited: 1 times. (23) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2011-06 Bosses and Kings: Asymmetric Power in Paired Common Pool and Public Good Games (2011). Cited: 1 times. (24) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2011-02 Cooperating to Resist Coercion: An Experimental Study (2011). Cited: 1 times. (25) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-22 Beauty, Gender and Stereotypes: Evidence from Laboratory Experiments (2005). Cited: 1 times. (26) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-14 Altruism Spillovers: Are Behaviors in Context-Free Experiments Predictive of Altruism Toward a Naturally Occurring Public Good? (2006). Cited: 1 times. (27) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2007-03 Inconsistent Choices in Lottery Experiments: Evidence from Rwanda (2007). Cited: 1 times. (28) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2011-01 Avoiding the Curves: Direct Elicitation of Time Preferences (2011). Cited: 1 times. (29) RePEc:exc:wpaper:2010-07 Trust with Private and Common Property: Effects of Stronger Property Right Entitlements (2010). Cited: 1 times. Recent citations received in: | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 Recent citations received in: 2009 Recent citations received in: 2008 (1) RePEc:fiu:wpaper:0801 Measuring Risk Attitudes Controlling for Personality Traits (2008). Working Papers Recent citations received in: 2007 (1) RePEc:ant:wpaper:2007026 Sequential Reciprocity in Two-Player, Two-Stage Games: An Experimental Analysis (2007). Working Papers (2) RePEc:idb:wpaper:4545 Traditional Excluding Forces: A Review of the Quantitative Literature on the Economic Situation of Indigenous Peoples, Afro-Descendants, and People Living with Disability (2007). RES Working Papers (3) RePEc:idb:wpaper:4546 Fuerzas tradicionales de exclusión: Una revisión de la literatura cuantitativa sobre la situación económica de los pueblos indígenas, afrodescendientes y personas con discapacidad (2007). RES Working Papers (4) RePEc:ner:leuven:urn:hdl:123456789/120451 Sequential reciprocity in two-player, two-stage games: An experimental analysis. (2007). Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Recent citations received in: 2006 (1) RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0221 A Note on the Risk Behavior and Death of Homo Economicus (2006). Working Papers in Economics (2) RePEc:usi:labsit:005 Altruism and Gender in the Trust Game (2006). Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena (3) RePEc:yor:yorken:06/18 What Price Compromise? Testing a Possibly Surprising Implication of Nash Bargaining Theory (2006). Discussion Papers Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|