Judgment and Decision Making

Raw citation data, Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Published documents, Citations received, , Most cited papers , Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII 1996 0.18 0 0 0 0.08 1997 0.21 0 0 0 0.08 1998 0.22 0 0 0 0.1 1999 0.28 0 0 0 0.13 2000 0.37 0 0 0 0.16 2001 0.37 0 0 0 0.16 2002 0.41 0 0 0 0.19 2003 0.42 0 0 0 0.2 2004 0.47 0 0 0 0.21 2005 0.5 0 0 0 0.23 2006 0.51 18 12 0 0 1 0.06 0.22 2007 0.4 35 13 18 0 1 0.03 0.18 2008 0.13 0.42 60 37 53 7 57.1 9 0.15 0.21 2009 0.11 0.43 56 19 95 10 60 7 0.13 0.19
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.   AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y
Impact Factor:	Immediacy Index:
Documents published:	Citations received:

Most cited documents in this series:

(1) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:100-121 The recognition heuristic: A decade of research (2011).
Cited: 8 times.

(2) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:21-32 How to study cognitive decision algorithms: The case of the priority heuristic (2010).
Cited: 7 times.

(3) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:272-284 Precise models deserve precise measures: A methodological dissection (2010).
Cited: 7 times.

(4) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:258-271 Less-is-more effects without the recognition heuristic (2010).
Cited: 6 times.

(5) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:89-99 Four challenges for cognitive research on the recognition heuristic and a call for a research strategy shift (2011).
Cited: 6 times.

(6) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:216-229 Why recognition is rational: Optimality results on single-variable decision rules (2010).
Cited: 6 times.

(7) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:7-22 Threshold models of recognition and the recognition heuristic (2011).
Cited: 6 times.

(8) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:2:y:2007:i::p:137-168 Goals and plans in decision making (2007).
Cited: 5 times.

(9) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:230-243 When less is more in the recognition heuristic (2010).
Cited: 5 times.

(10) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i:6:p:457-462 One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic (2008).
Cited: 5 times.

(11) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:43-57 Recognition judgments and the performance of the recognition heuristic depend on the size of the reference class (2011).
Cited: 4 times.

(12) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:5-17 The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making (2008).
Cited: 4 times.

(13) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:1-12 Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gamblers fallacy (2006).
Cited: 3 times.

(14) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:364-370 Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency, (2008).
Cited: 3 times.

(15) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:23-42 Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time (2011).
Cited: 3 times.

(16) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:154-163 Searching for coherence in a correspondence world (2009).
Cited: 3 times.

(17) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:73-88 Forecasting elections with mere recognition from small, lousy samples: A comparison of collective recognition, wisdom of crowds, and representative polls (2011).
Cited: 3 times.

(18) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:5:p:413-422 The limited value of precise tests of the recognition heuristic (2011).
Cited: 3 times.

(19) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:292-303 New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis (2008).
Cited: 3 times.

(20) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:344-354 Moral distance in dictator games (2008).
Cited: 3 times.

(21) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:310-325 I like what I know: Is recognition a non-compensatory determiner of consumer choice? (2010).
Cited: 3 times.

(22) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:1-6 Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (II) (2011).
Cited: 3 times.

(23) repec:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:118-133 ().
Cited: 3 times.

(24) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:3:p:200-213 Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences (2009).
Cited: 3 times.

(25) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:33-47 A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations (2006).
Cited: 3 times.

(26) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:371-388 A short form of the Maximization Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies, (2008).
Cited: 3 times.

(27) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:335-354 How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes (2009).
Cited: 3 times.

(28) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:317-324 On the perception and operationalization of risk perception (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(29) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:229-243 Sequential evidence accumulation in decision making: The individual desired level of confidence can explain the extent of information acquisition (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(30) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:5:p:423-438 On the use of recognition in inferential decision making: An overview of the debate (2011).
Cited: 2 times.

(31) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:5:p:359-380 Recognition-based judgments and decisions: What we have learned (so far) (2011).
Cited: 2 times.

(32) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:6:p:509-517 Are complex decisions better left to the unconscious? Further failed replications of the deliberation-without-attention effect (2009).
Cited: 2 times.

(33) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:5:p:391-410 Fast Acceptance by Common Experience - FACE-recognition in Schellings model of neighborhood segregation (2010).
Cited: 2 times.

(34) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:-416 How to make a risk seem riskier: The ratio bias versus construal level theory (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(35) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:205-214 Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(36) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:278-291 An ecological perspective to cognitive limits: Modeling environment-mind interactions with ACT-R (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(37) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:126-133 Correspondence and coherence in science: A brief historical perspective (2009).
Cited: 2 times.

(38) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:195-204 Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(39) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:429-435 On the relative importance of the hot stove effect and the tendency to rely on small samples (2009).
Cited: 2 times.

(40) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:58-72 The wisdom of ignorant crowds: Predicting sport outcomes by mere recognition (2011).
Cited: 2 times.

(41) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i:8:p:636-640 Perceived time pressure and the Iowa Gambling Task (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(42) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:261-277 The importance of learning when making inferences (2008).
Cited: 2 times.

(43) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:7:p:616-628 The size and distribution of donations: Effects of number of recipients (2011).
Cited: 2 times.

(44) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:8:p:843-856 What would judgment and decision making research be like if we took a Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing? (2011).
Cited: 1 times.

(45) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:1-19 Time preference and its relationship with age, health, and survival probability (2009).
Cited: 1 times.

(46) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i:8:p:619-635 Intuitive numbers guide decisions (2008).
Cited: 1 times.

(47) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:3:p:186-199 Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method (2009).
Cited: 1 times.

(48) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:5:p:381-391 Effects of ignorance and information on judgments and decisions (2011).
Cited: 1 times.

(49) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:7:p:543-553 Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions (2009).
Cited: 1 times.

(50) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:8:p:733-739 The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making (2011).
Cited: 1 times.

Recent citations received in: | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006

Recent citations received in: 2009

(1) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:113-115 Introduction to the special issue: Coherence and correspondence in judgment and decision making (2009). Judgment and Decision Making

(2) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:116-125 Theories of truth as assessment criteria in judgment and decision making (2009). Judgment and Decision Making

(3) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:175-185 Coherence and correspondence in the psychological analysis of numerical predictions: How error-prone heuristics are replaced by ecologically valid heuristics (2009). Judgment and Decision Making

(4) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:335-354 How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes (2009). Judgment and Decision Making

(5) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:7:p:518-529 The role of representation in experience-based choice (2009). Judgment and Decision Making

(6) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:7:p:587-600 A fine-grained analysis of the jumping-to-conclusions bias in schizophrenia: Data-gathering, response confidence, and information integration} (2009). Judgment and Decision Making

(7) RePEc:pra:mprapa:17647 The hot stove effect in repeated-play decision making under ambiguity (2009). MPRA Paper

Recent citations received in: 2008

(1) RePEc:gra:wpaper:08/12 Expected Behavior in the Dictator Game. (2008). ThE Papers

(2) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i:8:p:636-640 Perceived time pressure and the Iowa Gambling Task (2008). Judgment and Decision Making

(3) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:195-204 Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research (2008). Judgment and Decision Making

(4) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:205-214 Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor (2008). Judgment and Decision Making

(5) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:28-41 Intuitive decisions on the fringes of consciousness: Are they conscious and does it matter? (2008). Judgment and Decision Making

(6) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:42-50 In the winning mood: Affect in the Iowa gambling task (2008). Judgment and Decision Making

(7) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:51-63 Taboos and conflicts in decision making: Sacred values, decision difficulty, and emotions (2008). Judgment and Decision Making

(8) RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2008_42 Information Processing in Decisions under Risk: Evidence for Compensatory Strategies based on Automatic Processes (2008). Working Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

(9) RePEc:usi:labsit:022 Cognitive Biases and Gaze Direction: An Experimental Study (2008). Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena

Recent citations received in: 2007

(1) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:2:y:2007:i::p:251-256 Framing the frame: How task goals determine the likelihood and direction of framing effects (2007). Judgment and Decision Making

Recent citations received in: 2006

(1) RePEc:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:1-12 Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gamblers fallacy (2006). Judgment and Decision Making

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.