[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370
references and 3.213.942 citations
|
|
|
|
EIIW Discussion paper / University Library of Wuppertal
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.08 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1992 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1993 | | 0.11 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.13 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1995 | | 0.14 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1996 | | 0.17 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1997 | | 0.18 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1998 | | 0.21 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.14 |
1999 | | 0.27 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2000 | | 0.37 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
2001 | | 0.35 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.18 |
2002 | | 0.39 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2003 | | 0.42 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2004 | | 0.45 | 6 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2005 | | 0.45 | 13 | 1 | 6 | | 0 | | | 0.26 |
2006 | | 0.48 | 9 | 1 | 19 | | 0 | 1 | 0.11 | 0.22 |
2007 | | 0.41 | 2 | 0 | 22 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2008 | | 0.41 | 8 | 0 | 11 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2009 | | 0.37 | 11 | 0 | 10 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2010 | | 0.28 | 2 | 0 | 19 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
2006 | Rational Regulatory Policy for the Digital Economy: Theory and EU Policy Options RePEc:bwu:eiiwdp:disbei146 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2005 | Economic Opening up of Russia: Establishment of New EU-RF Trade Relations in View of EU Eastern Enlargement RePEc:bwu:eiiwdp:disbei130 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0: Cites in year: CiY Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|