[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370
references and 3.213.942 citations
|
|
|
|
Managerial Auditing Journal / Emerald Group Publishing
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1992 | | 0.08 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1993 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1995 | | 0.12 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.06 |
1996 | | 0.16 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.08 |
1997 | | 0.21 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.08 |
1998 | | 0.22 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1999 | | 0.28 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.13 |
2000 | | 0.37 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2001 | | 0.38 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2002 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
2003 | | 0.43 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
2004 | | 0.49 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2005 | | 0.52 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.24 |
2006 | | 0.5 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.23 |
2007 | | 0.42 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2008 | | 0.43 | 45 | 5 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2009 | 0.02 | 0.43 | 44 | 6 | 45 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2010 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 45 | 5 | 89 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.15 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
2010 | Audit pricing and the Big4 fee premium: evidence from Belgium RePEc:eme:majpps:v:25:y:2010:i:2:p:122-139 [Citation Analysis] | 3 | 2009 | The audit trinity: the key to securing corporate accountability RePEc:eme:majpps:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:156-182 [Citation Analysis] | 3 | 2008 | Confucian culture and whistle-blowing by professional accountants: an exploratory study RePEc:eme:majpps:v:23:y:2008:i:5:p:504-526 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2010 | Determinants of corporate internet reporting: evidence from Egypt RePEc:eme:majpps:v:25:y:2010:i:2:p:182-202 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2009 | The audit crunch: reforming auditing RePEc:eme:majpps:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:135-155 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2008 | The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting: The case of Malaysia RePEc:eme:majpps:v:23:y:2008:i:4:p:386-404 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2009 | The future of the external audit function RePEc:eme:majpps:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:104-113 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2008 | Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies RePEc:eme:majpps:v:23:y:2008:i:3:p:240-261 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2009 | Commitment to independence by internal auditors: the effects of role ambiguity and role conflict RePEc:eme:majpps:v:24:y:2009:i:9:p:899-925 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2009 | Management accounting practices in the Greek hospitality industry RePEc:eme:majpps:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:81-98 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2009 | The audit expectations gap and the role of audit education: the case of an emerging economy RePEc:eme:majpps:v:24:y:2009:i:6:p:564-583 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2008 | Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies RePEc:eme:majpps:v:23:y:2008:i:8:p:744-778 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2011 | The internal audit function: Perceptions of internal audit roles, effectiveness and evaluation RePEc:eme:majpps:v:26:y:2011:i:7:p:605-622 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 1: |
2010 | Consideration of the Role of Guanxi in the Ethical Judgments of Chinese Managers RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:96:y:2010:i:2:p:207-221 | [Citation Analysis] | Cites in year: CiY Recent citations received in: 2010 Recent citations received in: 2009 Recent citations received in: 2008 Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|