[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370
references and 3.213.942 citations
|
|
|
|
Payment Cards Center Discussion Paper / Fed in Print
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.08 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1992 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1993 | | 0.11 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.13 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1995 | | 0.14 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1996 | | 0.17 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1997 | | 0.18 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1998 | | 0.21 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.14 |
1999 | | 0.27 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2000 | | 0.37 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
2001 | | 0.35 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.18 |
2002 | | 0.39 | 11 | 6 | 4 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2003 | | 0.42 | 11 | 31 | 15 | | 0 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.21 |
2004 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 6 | 1 | 22 | 4 | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2005 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 12 | 4 | 17 | 9 | 0 | | | 0.26 |
2006 | 0.17 | 0.48 | 9 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 66.7 | | | 0.22 |
2007 | 0.1 | 0.41 | 5 | 7 | 21 | 2 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2008 | 0.07 | 0.41 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2009 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2010 | | 0.28 | 3 | 0 | 9 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
2003 | Theory of credit card networks: a survey of the literature RePEc:fip:fedpdp:03-09 [Citation Analysis] | 24 | 2003 | Credit card pricing developments and their disclosure RePEc:fip:fedpdp:03-02 [Citation Analysis] | 7 | 2007 | Where is the missing credit card debt? Clues and implications RePEc:fip:fedpdp:07-11 [Citation Analysis] | 4 | 2002 | Fraud management in the credit card industry RePEc:fip:fedpdp:02-05 [Citation Analysis] | 3 | 2005 | Identity theft: do definitions still matter? RePEc:fip:fedpdp:05-10 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2005 | Prepaid card models: a study in diversity RePEc:fip:fedpdp:05-03 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2006 | Supply- and demand-side developments influencing growth in the debit market RePEc:fip:fedpdp:06-11 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2002 | The evolution of EFT networks from ATMs to new on-line debit payment products RePEc:fip:fedpdp:02-04 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2007 | Prepaid cards: vulnerable to money laundering? RePEc:fip:fedpdp:07-02 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2002 | Retail credit risk modeling and the Basel Capital Accord RePEc:fip:fedpdp:02-01 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2001 | Credit cards and payment efficiency RePEc:fip:fedpdp:01-02 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2004 | The debate over the National Bank Act and the preemption of state efforts to regulate credit cards RePEc:fip:fedpdp:04-02 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2007 | The merchant-acquiring side of the payment card industry; structure, operations, and challenges RePEc:fip:fedpdp:07-12 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2002 | An overview of credit card asset-backed securities RePEc:fip:fedpdp:02-14 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2006 | Prepaid cards: an important innovation in financial services RePEc:fip:fedpdp:06-07 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2003 | Consumer bankruptcy: how unsecured lenders fare RePEc:fip:fedpdp:03-17 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2006 | Micropayments: the final frontier for electronic consumer payments RePEc:fip:fedpdp:06-04 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2003 | Measuring credit card industry chargeoffs: a review of sources and methods RePEc:fip:fedpdp:03-15 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2007 | General-use prepaid cards: the path to gaining mainstream acceptance RePEc:fip:fedpdp:07-03 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0: Cites in year: CiY Recent citations received in: 2007 Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|