[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370
references and 3.213.942 citations
|
|
|
|
Catholique de Louvain - Institut de statistique / BibEc Project
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.08 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1992 | | 0.09 | 11 | 46 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1993 | | 0.11 | 2 | 1 | 11 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.13 | | 0 | 13 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1995 | | 0.14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | 0 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.09 |
1996 | | 0.17 | 7 | 21 | 3 | | 0 | 1 | 0.14 | 0.09 |
1997 | | 0.18 | 2 | 0 | 10 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1998 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 10 | 40 | 9 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.14 |
1999 | | 0.27 | 8 | 152 | 12 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2000 | | 0.37 | 10 | 16 | 18 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
2001 | 0.11 | 0.35 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 2 | 0 | | | 0.18 |
2002 | 0.17 | 0.39 | | 0 | 12 | 2 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2003 | | 0.42 | | 0 | 2 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2004 | | 0.45 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2005 | | 0.45 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.26 |
2006 | | 0.48 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2007 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2008 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2009 | | 0.37 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2010 | | 0.28 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
1999 | Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: the State of the Art. RePEc:fth:louvis:9904 [Citation Analysis] | 147 | 1998 | A General Methodology for Bootstrapping in Nonparametric Frontier Models. RePEc:fth:louvis:9811 [Citation Analysis] | 30 | 1992 | Efficient Estimation of Monotone Boundaries. RePEc:fth:louvis:9209 [Citation Analysis] | 20 | 1996 | A Note on the Convergence of Nonparametric DEA Efficiency Measures RePEc:fth:louvis:9603 [Citation Analysis] | 18 | 1992 | Efficient Semiparametric Estimation in Stochastic Frontier Model. RePEc:fth:louvis:9201 [Citation Analysis] | 14 | 1992 | Applied Nonparametric Methods. RePEc:fth:louvis:9204 [Citation Analysis] | 13 | 2000 | Testing Restrictions in Nonparametric Efficiency Models. RePEc:fth:louvis:0013 [Citation Analysis] | 10 | 1998 | Productivity Growth in Industrialized Countries RePEc:fth:louvis:9810 [Citation Analysis] | 8 | 2000 | Performance of the Bootstrap for DEA Estimators and Iterating the Principle. RePEc:fth:louvis:2 [Citation Analysis] | 5 | 1999 | Wavelets in Time Series Analysis. RePEc:fth:louvis:9901 [Citation Analysis] | 5 | 1996 | Classical and Bayesian Inference Robustness in Multivariate Regression models. RePEc:fth:louvis:9602 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 1998 | Une analyse non parametrique des distributions du revenu et des caracteristiques des menages. RePEc:fth:louvis:9809 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2001 | Bootstrap Bandwidth Selection in Kernel Density Estimation from a Contaminated Sample. RePEc:fth:louvis:0116 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2000 | Stochastic Analysis of Duplicates in Life Insurance Portfolios. RePEc:fth:louvis:0004 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1995 | GMM Estimation of Panel Probit Models : Nonparametric Estimation of the Optimal Instruments RePEc:fth:louvis:9504 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2000 | Stochastic Analysis of Duplicates in Life Insurance Portfolios. RePEc:fth:louvis:4 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1993 | Stochastic Frontiers: A Semiparametric Approach. RePEc:fth:louvis:9303 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1996 | Testing Monotonicity of Regression. RePEc:fth:louvis:9610 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0: Cites in year: CiY Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|