CitEc
[home]     [Citation data for:  series | authors | papers]      [Maintainers]      [Submit references]      [warning | faq | about]
  Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370 references and 3.213.942 citations

 

 
 

Discussion Papers / Centre for Health Economics Research & Evaluation (CHERE), University of Tecnology, Sydney

Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.

Create citation feed for this series

Missing citations? Add them with our user input service
Incorrect content? Let us know

Raw data:
IF AIF DOC CIT D2Y C2Y SC(%) CiY II AII
19900.090000.04
19910.0821000.04
19920.09822020.250.05
19930.10.116210110010.170.05
19940.13101400.05
19950.140700.09
19960.1710100.09
19970.1810100.09
19980.2120200.14
19990.2720300.16
20000.370400.15
20010.3530200.18
20020.39323010.330.19
20030.420600.21
20040.4541300.21
20050.4510400.26
20060.20.4805100.22
20070.410100.19
20080.410000.19
20090.370000.19
20100.280000.16
 
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CIT: Number of citations to the series in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
SC(%): Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
IdI: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

 

Main indicators

Most cited documents in this series:
YearTitleCited
1992Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10
RePEc:her:chedps:10 [Citation Analysis]
2
1992Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - overview, CHERE Discussion Paper No 9
RePEc:her:chedps:9 [Citation Analysis]
2
1992Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - reasons for non-participation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 11
RePEc:her:chedps:11 [Citation Analysis]
1
2002Using qualitative methods to validate a stated preference survey for evaluating health services, CHERE Discussion Paper No 47
RePEc:her:chedps:47 [Citation Analysis]
1
1993Advancing health in NSW: planning in an economic framework, CHERE Discussion Paper No 23
RePEc:her:chedps:23 [Citation Analysis]
1
1991Economic evaluation of health care Guidelines for costing, CHERE Discussion Paper No 1
RePEc:her:chedps:1 [Citation Analysis]
1
1993Health outcomes: a health economics perspective, CHERE Discussion Paper No 19
RePEc:her:chedps:19 [Citation Analysis]
1
2004Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
RePEc:her:chedps:53 [Citation Analysis]
1
1992Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - economic evaluation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 12
RePEc:her:chedps:12 [Citation Analysis]
1
2002Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48
RePEc:her:chedps:48 [Citation Analysis]
1

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:
YearTitleSee

Cites in year: CiY

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.

Hosted by Valencian Economic Research Institute ©2012 Jose Manuel Barrueco | mail: barrueco@uv.es