[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370
references and 3.213.942 citations
|
|
|
|
Discussion Papers / Centre for Health Economics Research & Evaluation (CHERE), University of Tecnology, Sydney
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.08 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1992 | | 0.09 | 8 | 2 | 2 | | 0 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.05 |
1993 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.13 | 1 | 0 | 14 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1995 | | 0.14 | | 0 | 7 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1996 | | 0.17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1997 | | 0.18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1998 | | 0.21 | 2 | 0 | 2 | | 0 | | | 0.14 |
1999 | | 0.27 | 2 | 0 | 3 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2000 | | 0.37 | | 0 | 4 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
2001 | | 0.35 | 3 | 0 | 2 | | 0 | | | 0.18 |
2002 | | 0.39 | 3 | 2 | 3 | | 0 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.19 |
2003 | | 0.42 | | 0 | 6 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2004 | | 0.45 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2005 | | 0.45 | 1 | 0 | 4 | | 0 | | | 0.26 |
2006 | 0.2 | 0.48 | | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2007 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 1 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2008 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2009 | | 0.37 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2010 | | 0.28 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
1992 | Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10 RePEc:her:chedps:10 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 1992 | Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - overview, CHERE Discussion Paper No 9 RePEc:her:chedps:9 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 1992 | Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - reasons for non-participation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 11 RePEc:her:chedps:11 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2002 | Using qualitative methods to validate a stated preference survey for evaluating health services, CHERE Discussion Paper No 47 RePEc:her:chedps:47 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1993 | Advancing health in NSW: planning in an economic framework, CHERE Discussion Paper No 23 RePEc:her:chedps:23 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1991 | Economic evaluation of health care Guidelines for costing, CHERE Discussion Paper No 1 RePEc:her:chedps:1 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1993 | Health outcomes: a health economics perspective, CHERE Discussion Paper No 19 RePEc:her:chedps:19 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2004 | Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53 RePEc:her:chedps:53 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1992 | Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - economic evaluation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 12 RePEc:her:chedps:12 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2002 | Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48 RePEc:her:chedps:48 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0: Cites in year: CiY Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|