[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370
references and 3.213.942 citations
|
|
|
|
Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series / Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.08 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1992 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1993 | | 0.11 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.13 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1995 | | 0.14 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1996 | | 0.17 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1997 | | 0.18 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1998 | | 0.21 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.14 |
1999 | | 0.27 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2000 | | 0.37 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
2001 | | 0.35 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.18 |
2002 | | 0.39 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2003 | | 0.42 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2004 | | 0.45 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2005 | | 0.45 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.26 |
2006 | | 0.48 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2007 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2008 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2009 | | 0.37 | 8 | 26 | 0 | | 0 | 1 | 0.13 | 0.19 |
2010 | 1.75 | 0.28 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 14 | 7.1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.16 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
2009 | Donor influence in international financial institutions: Deciphering what alignment measures measure RePEc:vil:papers:8 [Citation Analysis] | 17 | 2010 | Informal influence in the Asian Development Bank RePEc:vil:papers:13 [Citation Analysis] | 7 | 2010 | An empirical assessment of informal influence in the World Bank RePEc:vil:papers:9 [Citation Analysis] | 4 | 2009 | The Impact of Aid on Growth Revisited: Do Donor Motives Matter? RePEc:vil:papers:5 [Citation Analysis] | 4 | 2009 | Money Holdings, Inflation, and Welfare in a Competitive Market RePEc:vil:papers:2 [Citation Analysis] | 3 | 2009 | Changing Aid Regimes? U.S. Foreign Aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror RePEc:vil:papers:1 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2010 | What Determines the Size of Aid Projects? RePEc:vil:papers:10 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 14: |
2010 | Are New Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid
between Non-DAC and DAC Donor Countries RePEc:kof:wpskof:10-255 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | Are âNewâ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid between Non-DAC and DAC Donor Countries RePEc:got:gotcrc:025 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | Are âNewâ Donors Different?
Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid
between Non-DAC and
DAC Donor Countries RePEc:got:cegedp:96 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | An empirical assessment of informal influence in the World Bank RePEc:vil:papers:9 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | Are âNewâ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid between Non-DAC and DAC Donor Countries RePEc:kie:kieliw:1601 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | IMF Lending in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Wake of the Global Crisis RePEc:csl:devewp:305 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | New Monetarist Economics: Models RePEc:pra:mprapa:21030 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | New Monetarist Economics: Methods RePEc:pra:mprapa:21486 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | New monetarist economics: methods RePEc:fip:fedlrv:y:2010:i:may:p:265-302:n:v.92no.4 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | Business Cycle Fluctuations, Large Shocks, and Development Aid: New Evidence RePEc:imf:imfwpa:10/240 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | The costs of favoritism:
Is politically-driven aid less effective? RePEc:got:cegedp:97 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | The Costs of Favoritism: Is Politically-driven Aid less Effective? RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2993 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | The Costs of Favoritism: Is Politically-Driven Aid Less Effective? RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4820 | [Citation Analysis] | 2010 | The costs of favoritism: Is politically-driven aid less effective? RePEc:got:gotcrc:026 | [Citation Analysis] | Cites in year: CiY Recent citations received in: 2010 |
2010 | Quality of Official Development Assistance Assessment RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:3228 | [Citation Analysis] | Recent citations received in: 2009 |
2009 | Country or Leader? Political Change and UN General Assembly Voting RePEc:kof:wpskof:08-217 | [Citation Analysis] | Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|