[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated Jun, 1 2012 364.619 documents processed, 8.178.370
references and 3.213.942 citations
|
|
|
|
Princeton Economic Theory Papers / WoPEc Project
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2010), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.08 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1992 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1993 | | 0.11 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.13 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1995 | | 0.14 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1996 | | 0.17 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1997 | | 0.18 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1998 | | 0.21 | 3 | 5 | 0 | | 0 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.14 |
1999 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 13 | 48 | 3 | 2 | 50 | 2 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
2000 | 0.56 | 0.37 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 0.5 | 0.15 |
2001 | 0.17 | 0.35 | | 0 | 23 | 4 | 0 | | | 0.18 |
2002 | 0.3 | 0.39 | | 0 | 10 | 3 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2003 | | 0.42 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2004 | | 0.45 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2005 | | 0.45 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.26 |
2006 | | 0.48 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2007 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2008 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2009 | | 0.37 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2010 | | 0.28 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.16 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
1999 | Self-Control and the Theory of Consumption RePEc:wop:prinet:99f2 [Citation Analysis] | 12 | 2000 | Second Opinions and Price Competition: Inefficiency in the Market for Expert Advice RePEc:wop:prinet:00s18 [Citation Analysis] | 8 | 1999 | Provision of Public Goods Under Alternative Electral Incentives RePEc:wop:prinet:99f4 [Citation Analysis] | 8 | 1999 | Interactive Beliefs and Forward Induction RePEc:wop:prinet:99f3 [Citation Analysis] | 7 | 1999 | Economics and Language RePEc:wop:prinet:00s6 [Citation Analysis] | 6 | 1999 | Self-Confidence: Intrapersonal Strategies RePEc:wop:prinet:00s1 [Citation Analysis] | 5 | 1999 | Self-Confidence and Social Interactions RePEc:wop:prinet:00s2 [Citation Analysis] | 4 | 1998 | On the Question Who is a J?: A Social Choice Approach RePEc:wop:prinet:00s5 [Citation Analysis] | 4 | 1999 | Adverse Selection and Insurance with Uberrima Fides RePEc:wop:prinet:99f5 [Citation Analysis] | 3 | 2000 | Mobility as Progressivity: Ranking Income Processes According to Equality of Opportunity RePEc:wop:prinet:00f1 [Citation Analysis] | 3 | 1999 | Experience from a Course in Game Theory: Pre- and Post-class Problem Sets as a Didactic Device RePEc:wop:prinet:00s4 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 0000 | Bargaining, Reputation and Equilibrium Selection in Repeated Games RePEc:wop:prinet:00f2 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2000 | The Drawbacks of Electoral Competition RePEc:wop:prinet:00s14 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2000 | Debates and Decisions, On a Rationale of Argumentation Rules RePEc:wop:prinet:00s7 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 1999 | A Behavioral Model of Bargaining with Endogenous Types RePEc:wop:prinet:00s15 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1998 | Bargaining and Reputation RePEc:wop:prinet:00s9 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2000 | Imperfect Contracting RePEc:wop:prinet:00s11 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2000 | Non-Enforceability of Trade Treaties and the Most-Favored Nation Clause: A Game Theoretic Analysis of Investment Distortions RePEc:wop:prinet:00s17 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2000 | Unobservable Investment and the Hold-Up Problem RePEc:wop:prinet:00s10 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2000 | Contract Incompleteness, Contractual Enforcement and Bureaucracies RePEc:wop:prinet:00s16 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0: Cites in year: CiY Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|