[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated February, 5 2013 465.484 documents processed, 11.198.332
references and 4.512.497 citations
|
|
|
|
Utilitas / Cambridge University Press
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2011), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.08 | 32 | 4 | 33 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.08 | 33 | 2 | 65 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1992 | | 0.08 | 45 | 1 | 65 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1993 | | 0.09 | 39 | 0 | 78 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.1 | 49 | 1 | 84 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1995 | | 0.19 | 39 | 1 | 88 | | 0 | | | 0.07 |
1996 | | 0.23 | 33 | 2 | 88 | | 0 | | | 0.1 |
1997 | | 0.29 | 36 | 1 | 72 | | 0 | | | 0.1 |
1998 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 34 | 0 | 69 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.11 |
1999 | | 0.34 | 30 | 0 | 70 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
2000 | | 0.43 | 36 | 1 | 64 | | 0 | | | 0.17 |
2001 | | 0.45 | 35 | 0 | 66 | | 0 | | | 0.17 |
2002 | | 0.46 | 34 | 2 | 71 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2003 | | 0.48 | 41 | 1 | 69 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2004 | | 0.55 | 40 | 0 | 75 | | 0 | | | 0.23 |
2005 | | 0.57 | 35 | 0 | 81 | | 0 | | | 0.24 |
2006 | | 0.54 | 40 | 4 | 75 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2007 | 0.01 | 0.48 | 37 | 0 | 75 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2008 | | 0.5 | 34 | 1 | 77 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2009 | | 0.51 | 38 | 0 | 71 | | 0 | | | 0.21 |
2010 | | 0.46 | 45 | 0 | 72 | | 0 | | | 0.17 |
2011 | | 0.64 | 36 | 1 | 83 | | 0 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.26 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
1990 | Welfarism and Utilitarianism: A Rehabilitation RePEc:cup:utilit:v:2:y:1990:i:02:p:171-193_00 [Citation Analysis] | 4 | 2002 | Prioritarianism for Prospects RePEc:cup:utilit:v:14:y:2002:i:01:p:2-21_00 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 1991 | The Greatest Happiness Principle RePEc:cup:utilit:v:3:y:1991:i:01:p:37-51_00 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 1996 | The Principle of Utility and the Principle of Righteousness: Yen Fu and Utilitarianism in Modern China RePEc:cup:utilit:v:8:y:1996:i:01:p:109-126_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2000 | Multi-Dimensional Utility and the Index Number Problem: Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill, and Qualitative Hedonism RePEc:cup:utilit:v:12:y:2000:i:02:p:176-203_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2006 | What We Desire, What We Have Reason to Desire, Whatever We Might Desire: Mill and Sen on the Value of Opportunity RePEc:cup:utilit:v:18:y:2006:i:01:p:33-51_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1995 | Obligation, Human Frailty, and Utilitarianism RePEc:cup:utilit:v:7:y:1995:i:01:p:145-156_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2011 | Sugdens Critique of the Capability Approach RePEc:cup:utilit:v:23:y:2011:i:01:p:25-51_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2006 | Capability, Happiness and Adaptation in Sen and J. S. Mill RePEc:cup:utilit:v:18:y:2006:i:01:p:20-32_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1994 | John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor on Women and Marriage RePEc:cup:utilit:v:6:y:1994:i:02:p:287-299_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2008 | Well-Being, Autonomy, and the Horizon Problem RePEc:cup:utilit:v:20:y:2008:i:02:p:143-168_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1997 | A Non-proportional Hybrid Moral Theory RePEc:cup:utilit:v:9:y:1997:i:03:p:291-306_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2003 | Can Deontologists Be Moderate? RePEc:cup:utilit:v:15:y:2003:i:01:p:71-75_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1992 | Well-Being and Value RePEc:cup:utilit:v:4:y:1992:i:01:p:1-26_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2006 | Prudence for Changing Selves RePEc:cup:utilit:v:18:y:2006:i:03:p:264-283_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 1996 | Utilitarian Premises and the Evolutionary Framework of Marshalls Economics RePEc:cup:utilit:v:8:y:1996:i:01:p:89-108_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2006 | Reason, Freedom and Well-being RePEc:cup:utilit:v:18:y:2006:i:01:p:80-96_00 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0: Cites in year: CiY Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|