| [home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
|
Updated February, 5 2013 465.484 documents processed, 11.198.332
references and 4.512.497 citations
|
|
|
|
|
One Pager / International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2011), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.  Create citation feed for this series
Missing citations? Add them with our user input service
Incorrect content? Let us know
| Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
| 1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
| 1991 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1992 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1993 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1994 | | 0.12 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
| 1995 | | 0.17 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1996 | | 0.2 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1997 | | 0.21 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1998 | | 0.22 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.13 |
| 1999 | | 0.29 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
| 2000 | | 0.4 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
| 2001 | | 0.38 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.18 |
| 2002 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2003 | | 0.44 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2004 | | 0.46 | 8 | 6 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2005 | 0.13 | 0.46 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.25 |
| 2006 | 0.22 | 0.49 | 8 | 3 | 18 | 4 | 0 | | | 0.22 |
| 2007 | 0.11 | 0.42 | 21 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
| 2008 | | 0.43 | 26 | 5 | 29 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
| 2009 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 28 | 2 | 47 | 2 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
| 2010 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 18 | 0 | 54 | 2 | 0 | | | 0.16 |
| 2011 | 0.02 | 0.5 | | 0 | 46 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.27 |
| |
|
|
Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
| 2004 | Defining pro-poor growth: a response to Kakwani
RePEc:ipc:opager:4 [Citation Analysis] | 4 | | 2004 | Pro-poor growth: finding the Holy Grail
RePEc:ipc:opager:6 [Citation Analysis] | 3 | | 2004 | Methods in measuring poverty matter: an Indian story.
RePEc:ipc:opager:2 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | | 2009 | Do Poorer Countries Have Less Capacity for Redistribution?
RePEc:ipc:opager:97 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | | 2005 | Defining pro-poor growth
RePEc:ipc:opager:9 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | | 2006 | Do CCTs Reduce Poverty?
RePEc:ipc:opager:21 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | | 2008 | The New Global Poverty Estimates ? Digging Deeper into a Hole
RePEc:ipc:opager:65 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2007 | Why Is Africa Constrained from Spending ODA?
RePEc:ipc:opager:34 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2008 | Tariff Hikes with Low Investment: The Story of the Urban Water Sector in Zambia
RePEc:ipc:opager:57 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2006 | Old-Age Poverty and Social Pensions in Kenya
RePEc:ipc:opager:25 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2008 | Where the Line is Drawn. A Rejoinder to Ravallion
RePEc:ipc:opager:69 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2008 | Inflation-Targeting in Sub-Saharan Africa: Why Now? Why at All?
RePEc:ipc:opager:51 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2008 | Global Poverty Reassessed: A Reply to Reddy
RePEc:ipc:opager:66 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2007 | ?Growing Pains?: Key Challenges for New Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes in Latin America
RePEc:ipc:opager:44 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 1: |
| 2011 | Social protection 2.0: Exploring issues, evidence and debates in a globalizing world
RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:36:y:2011:i:3:p:329-340 | [Citation Analysis] | Cites in year: CiY Recent citations received in: 2009 Recent citations received in: 2008 Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series. |
|
|
