[home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
Updated February, 5 2013 465.484 documents processed, 11.198.332
references and 4.512.497 citations
|
|
|
|
The Canadian Productivity Review / Statistics Canada
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2011), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers. Create citation feed for this series Missing citations? Add them with our user input service Incorrect content? Let us know
Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1991 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1992 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1993 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
1994 | | 0.12 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
1995 | | 0.17 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1996 | | 0.2 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1997 | | 0.21 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
1998 | | 0.22 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.13 |
1999 | | 0.29 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
2000 | | 0.4 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
2001 | | 0.38 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.18 |
2002 | | 0.41 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
2003 | | 0.44 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
2004 | | 0.46 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
2005 | | 0.46 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.25 |
2006 | | 0.49 | 3 | 0 | 1 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
2007 | | 0.42 | 11 | 15 | 4 | | 0 | 2 | 0.18 | 0.19 |
2008 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
2009 | 0.12 | 0.4 | 5 | 8 | 17 | 2 | 0 | | | 0.19 |
2010 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 0 | | | 0.16 |
2011 | 0.14 | 0.5 | | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | | | 0.27 |
|   |
  Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
2007 | Multifactor Productivity in Canada: An Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimating Capital Services RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2007009e [Citation Analysis] | 6 | 2009 | Productivity Performance in Canada, 1961 to 2008: An Update on Long-term Trends RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2009025e [Citation Analysis] | 6 | 2007 | User Guide for Statistics Canadas Annual Multifactor Productivity Program RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2007014e [Citation Analysis] | 6 | 2007 | Investment and Long-term Productivity Growth in the Canadian Business Sector, 1961 to 2002 RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2007006e [Citation Analysis] | 3 | 2007 | Long-term Productivity Growth in Canada and the United States RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2007013e [Citation Analysis] | 3 | 2008 | Relative Multifactor Productivity Levels in Canada and the United States: A Sectoral Analysis RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2008019e [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2009 | Investment in Intangible Assets in Canada: R&D, Innovation, Brand, and Mining, Oil and Gas Exploration Expenditures RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2009026e [Citation Analysis] | 2 | 2005 | Four Decades of Productivity Performance in Canada RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2005001e [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2007 | Productivity Performance in Canada, 1961 to 2005 RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2007011e [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2008 | Capital Intensity in Canada and the United States, 1987 to 2003 RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2008018e [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2008 | Infrastructure Capital: What Is It? Where Is It? How Much of It Is There? RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2008016e [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2007 | The Comparative Level of GDP Per Capita in Canada and the United States: A Decomposition into Labour Productivity and Work Intensity Differences RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2007008e [Citation Analysis] | 1 | 2008 | The Productivity Differential Between the Canadian and U.S. Manufacturing Sectors: A Perspective Drawn from the Early 20th Century RePEc:stc:stcp6e:2008022e [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 1: |
2011 | Insights from Latin America for Canada: A Review Article on The Age of Productivity: Transforming Economies from the Bottom Up RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:21:y:2011:4 | [Citation Analysis] | Cites in year: CiY Recent citations received in: 2009 Recent citations received in: 2008 |
2008 | An Examination of Public Capitals Role in Production RePEc:stc:stcp5e:2008050e | [Citation Analysis] | Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
|
|
|