| [home]
[Citation data for:
series |
authors |
papers]
[Maintainers]
[Submit references]
[warning |
faq |
about]
|
|
Updated February, 5 2013 465.484 documents processed, 11.198.332
references and 4.512.497 citations
|
|
|
|
|
Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) / University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Papers Archive
Raw citation data, Main indicators, Most cited papers , cites used to compute the impact factor (2011), Recent citations and documents published in this series in EconPapers.  Create citation feed for this series
Missing citations? Add them with our user input service
Incorrect content? Let us know
| Raw data: |
|
IF |
AIF |
DOC |
CIT |
D2Y |
C2Y |
SC(%) |
CiY |
II |
AII |
| 1990 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
| 1991 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1992 | | 0.09 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1993 | | 0.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.05 |
| 1994 | | 0.12 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.04 |
| 1995 | | 0.17 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1996 | | 0.2 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1997 | | 0.21 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.09 |
| 1998 | | 0.22 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.13 |
| 1999 | | 0.29 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
| 2000 | | 0.4 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.15 |
| 2001 | | 0.38 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.18 |
| 2002 | | 0.41 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2003 | | 0.44 | | 0 | 1 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2004 | | 0.46 | | 0 | 1 | | 0 | | | 0.2 |
| 2005 | | 0.46 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.25 |
| 2006 | | 0.49 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.22 |
| 2007 | | 0.42 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
| 2008 | | 0.43 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0.19 |
| 2009 | | 0.4 | 16 | 4 | 1 | | 0 | 3 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| 2010 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 17 | 6 | 17 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.16 |
| 2011 | 0.09 | 0.5 | 13 | 2 | 33 | 3 | 33.3 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.27 |
| |
|
|
Main indicatorsMost cited documents in this series: |
| 2010 | Selection into auctions for risky and ambiguous prospects
RePEc:uea:wcbess:10-06 [Citation Analysis] | 4 | | 2010 | The reasoning-based expected utility procedure
RePEc:uea:wcbess:09-04 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | | 2009 | Political autonomy and independence: Theory and experimental evidence
RePEc:uea:wcbess:09-12 [Citation Analysis] | 2 | | 2009 | Social desirability, approval and public good contribution
RePEc:uea:wcbess:09-11 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2011 | Crowding-in, crowding-out and over-crowding: The interaction between price and quantity based instruments and intrinsic motivation
RePEc:uea:wcbess:11-10 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2009 | The all-pay auction with non-monotonic payoff
RePEc:uea:wcbess:09-09 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2011 | Implementing theoretical models in the laboratory, and what this can and cannot achieve
RePEc:uea:wcbess:11-08 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | | 2009 | A generalized Tullock contest and the existence of multiple equilibria
RePEc:uea:wcbess:09-08 [Citation Analysis] | 1 | Citing documents used to compute impact factor 3: |
| 2011 | The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?
RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:4:p:615-641 | [Citation Analysis] | | 2011 | Common reasoning in games: a Lewisian analysis of common knowledge of rationality
RePEc:not:notcdx:2011-01 | [Citation Analysis] | | 2011 | Common reasoning in games: A Lewisian analysis of common knowledge of rationality
RePEc:uea:wcbess:11-05 | [Citation Analysis] | Cites in year: CiY Recent citations received in: 2011 |
| 2011 | Testing for the Best Instrument to Generate Sustainable Food Consumption
RePEc:ags:ijofsd:121945 | [Citation Analysis] | Recent citations received in: 2010 |
| 2010 | Ambiguous Information and Market Entry: An Experimental Study
RePEc:pra:mprapa:25276 | [Citation Analysis] | Recent citations received in: 2009 |
| 2009 | Conflict, Settlement, and the Shadow of the Future
RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2897 | [Citation Analysis] | | 2009 | Conflict, Settlement, and the Shadow of the Future
RePEc:irv:wpaper:080922 | [Citation Analysis] | | 2009 | The equivalence of contests
RePEc:uea:wcbess:09-06 | [Citation Analysis] | Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series. |
|
|
