2
H index
0
i10 index
9
Citations
École Normale Supérieure (ENS Lyon) | 2 H index 0 i10 index 9 Citations RESEARCH PRODUCTION: 3 Articles 4 Papers 1 Chapters RESEARCH ACTIVITY: 4 years (2018 - 2022). See details. MORE DETAILS IN: ABOUT THIS REPORT: Permalink: http://citec.repec.org/pde1307 |
Works with: Authors registered in RePEc who have co-authored more than one work in the last five years with Samuel Demeulemeester. | Is cited by: | Cites to: |
Journals with more than one article published | # docs |
---|---|
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought | 2 |
Working Papers Series with more than one paper published | # docs |
---|---|
Post-Print / HAL | 3 |
Year | Title of citing document |
---|---|
2024 | The case for 100% money: Ten reasons for separating money issuance from banking. (2024). Demeulemeester, Samuel. In: Economic Affairs. RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:44:y:2024:i:1:p:57-70. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | Soft monetary constraint and shortage in the European sovereign debt economy. (2024). Nenovsky, Nikolay ; Magnin, Eric. In: The Review of Austrian Economics. RePEc:kap:revaec:v:37:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11138-022-00584-x. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
Year | Title | Type | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | Dissocier la création monétaire des prêts bancaires : retour sur la proposition « 100 % monnaie » des années 1930 In: Revue d'économie politique. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
2020 | Would a State Monopoly Over Money Creation Allow for a Reduction of National Debt? A Study of the “Seigniorage Argument” in Light of the “100% Money” Debates In: Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | chapter | 0 |
2020 | Would a State Monopoly over Money Creation Allow for a Reduction of National Debt? A Study of the “Seigniorage Argument” in Light of the “100% Money” Debates.(2020) In: Post-Print. [Full Text][Citation analysis] This paper has nother version. Agregated cites: 0 | paper | |
2018 | The 100% money proposal and its implications for banking: the Currie–Fisher approach versus the Chicago Plan approach In: Post-Print. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 6 |
2018 | The 100% money proposal and its implications for banking: the Currie–Fisher approach versus the Chicago Plan approach.(2018) In: The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. [Full Text][Citation analysis] This paper has nother version. Agregated cites: 6 | article | |
2021 | The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: An avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas? In: Post-Print. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 3 |
2021 | The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: an avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?.(2021) In: The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. [Full Text][Citation analysis] This paper has nother version. Agregated cites: 3 | article | |
2022 | What analytical framework for Sovereign Money? Some insight from the 100% Money literature, and a comment on criticisms In: Working Papers. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 0 |
CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated November, 3 2024. Contact: CitEc Team