Last updated July, 3 2014 639.049 documents processed, 16.613.935 references and 6.218.529 citations

Discussion Papers / University of Oxford, Nuffield College

[Raw data] [Main indicators] [Most cited papers] [cites used to compute the impact factor] [Recent citations ][documents published in EconPapers] [Keep updated about new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators

Raw data:

IF AIF DOC CDO CCU CIF CIT D2Y C2Y %SC CiY II AII
19900.09000000.04
19910.09000000.05
19920.09000000.06
19930.1000000.05
19940.12000000.05
19950.16000000.09
19960.2000000.09
19970.2000000.08
19980.22000000.12
19990.27000000.15
20000.37000000.14
20010.38000000.17
20020.39000000.19
20030.42000000.19
20040.43000000.19
20050.45000000.23
20060.46000000.2
20070.4000000.17
20080.4000000.18
20090.37000000.18
20100.3355020000.16
201110.4551050.565500.22
20120.90.4821290.75210900.24
20130.430.54113100.7707300.26
20140.231330.230300.17
 
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF: Cumulative impact factor
CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
%SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

 

Most cited documents in this series:

YearTitleCited
2010Who should be called to the lab? A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. (2010). MILLER, LUIS ; Belot, Michèle ; Duch, Raymond . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010001.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15
2011Individual notions of distributive justice and relative economic status. (2011). MILLER, LUIS ; Barr, Abigail ; Burns, Justine ; Shaw, Ingrid . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011005.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3
2011Decision costs in legislative bargaining: An experimental analysis. (2011). Vanberg, Christoph ; MILLER, LUIS. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011002.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2010The Consistency of Fairness Rules: An Experimental Study. (2010). Ubeda, Paloma. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010005.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2012Ethnic discrimination and signals of trustworthiness in an online market: Evidence from two field experiments. (2012). Przepiorka, Wojtek. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2012002.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2010Revisiting Michael McBride’s experiment about “Money, happiness, and aspirations”. (2010). Barr, Abigail. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010003.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2010Are Women More Sensitive to the Decision-Making Context?. (2010). Ubeda, Paloma ; MILLER, LUIS. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010004.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2011Lifting the veil of ignorance: An experiment on the contagiousness of norm violations. (2011). Przepiorka, Wojtek ; Diekmann, Andreas ; Rauhut, Heiko . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011004.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:

YearTitleSee

Cites in year: CiY

Recent citations received in: 2012

YearTitleSee

Recent citations received in: 2011

YearTitleSee

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.