Last updated July, 3 2014 639.049 documents processed, 16.613.935 references and 6.218.529 citations

Journal of Reviews on Global Economics / Lifescience Global

[Raw data] [Main indicators] [Most cited papers] [cites used to compute the impact factor] [Recent citations ][documents published in EconPapers] [Keep updated about new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators

Raw data:

IF AIF DOC CDO CCU CIF CIT D2Y C2Y %SC CiY II AII
19900.09000000.04
19910.09000000.04
19920.09000000.04
19930.1000000.05
19940.11000000.05
19950.2000000.08
19960.24000000.1
19970.3000000.11
19980.29000000.11
19990.34000000.15
20000.42000000.16
20010.44000000.17
20020.45000000.2
20030.47000000.2
20040.53000000.22
20050.56000000.23
20060.55000000.22
20070.47000000.19
20080.5000000.21
20090.51000000.21
20100.47000000.17
20110.55010000.22
20120.67151510.073000.26
20130.130.92334830.062152010.030.34
20140.020.68186630.053481020.110.24
 
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF: Cumulative impact factor
CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
%SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

 

Most cited documents in this series:

YearTitleCited
2012Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies. (2012). Takalo, Tuomas. In: Journal of Reviews on Global Economics. RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:1:y:2012:p:157-167.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3
2014How Should Journal Quality be Ranked? An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics. (2014). McAleer, Michael ; Chang, Chia-Lin. In: Journal of Reviews on Global Economics. RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:3:y:2014:p:33-47.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3
2013Herding, Information Cascades and Volatility Spillovers in Futures Markets. (2013). McAleer, Michael ; Radalj, Kim . In: Journal of Reviews on Global Economics. RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:2:y:2013:p:307-329.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2013Improving Agricultural Productivity and Market Efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean: How ICTs can make a Difference?. (2013). Goyal, Aparajita. In: Journal of Reviews on Global Economics. RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:2:y:2013:p:172-182.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 1:

YearTitleSee
2014Are Public and Private R&D Investments Complements or Substitutes?. (2014). Bohnstedt, Anna . In: Ruhr Economic Papers. RePEc:rwi:repape:0485.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

[Citation Analysis]

Cites in year: CiY

Recent citations received in: 2014

YearTitleSee
2014Just How Good are the Top Three Journals in Finance? An Assessment Based on Quantity and Quality Citations. (2014). McAleer, Michael ; Chang, Chia-Lin. In: Working Papers in Economics. RePEc:cbt:econwp:14/14.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

[Citation Analysis]
2014Just How Good are the Top Three Journals in Finance? An Assessment Based on Quantity and Quality Citations. (2014). McAleer, Michael ; Chang, Chia-Lin. In: Documentos del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico. RePEc:ucm:doicae:1410.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

[Citation Analysis]

Recent citations received in: 2013

YearTitleSee
2013Agricultural Exports from Latin America and the Caribbean : Harnessing Trade to Feed the World and Promote Development. (2013). Chaherli, Nabil ; Nash, John . In: World Bank Other Operational Studies. RePEc:wbk:wboper:16048.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

[Citation Analysis]

Recent citations received in: 2012

YearTitleSee

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.