Last updated July, 3 2014 639.049 documents processed, 16.613.935 references and 6.218.529 citations

Journal of Marketing for Higher Education / Taylor & Francis Journals


[Raw data] [Main indicators] [Most cited papers] [cites used to compute the impact factor] [Recent citations ][documents published in EconPapers] [Keep updated about new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators


Raw data:


IF AIF DOC CDO CCU CIF CIT D2Y C2Y %SC CiY II AII
19900.09000000.04
19910.09000000.04
19920.09000000.04
19930.1000000.05
19940.11000000.05
19950.2000000.08
19960.24232302000.1
19970.31841032300.11
19980.292970044100.11
19990.34777004700.15
20000.4223100003600.16
20010.4411111003000.17
20020.4512123013400.2
20030.4717140002300.2
20040.537147002900.22
20050.5611158022400.23
20060.5516174001800.22
20070.040.47818230.02027100.19
20080.512194012400.21
20090.5110204012000.21
20100.471421820.0122200.17
20110.040.551122910024100.22
20120.671424330.0112500.26
20130.040.921225570.03025100.34
20140.6825520.0102600.24
 
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF: Cumulative impact factor
CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
%SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

 

Most cited documents in this series:


YearTitleCited
1996Graphical Representation of University Image: A Correspondence AnalysisJournal of Marketing for Higher Education. (1996). Yavas, Ugar ; Shemwell, Donald J.. In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:75-84.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
1998MBA Quality Signals. (1998). Chapman, Randall G.. In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:8:y:1998:i:4:p:29-48.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2005Factors Influencing International Students Choice of an Education Destination--A Correspondence Analysis. (2005). Shanka, Tekle ; Taylor, Ruth ; Quintal, Vanessa . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:15:y:2005:i:2:p:31-46.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2002The Current State of Marketing Activity Among Higher Education Institutions. (2002). Newman, Cynthia M.. In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:12:y:2002:i:1:p:15-29.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
1997Perceptions of Quality of Higher Education: An Exploratory Study of High School Guidance Counselors. (1997). Plank, Richard E. ; Chiagouris, Larry . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:8:y:1997:i:1:p:55-67.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2010Branding MBA programs: the use of target market desired outcomes for effective brand positioning. (2010). Heslop, Louise A. ; Nadeau, John . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:20:y:2010:i:1:p:85-117.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
1998University Image: The Benefits of Assessment and Modeling. (1998). Landrum, Eric R. ; Harless, Clayton ; Turrisi, Rob . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:9:y:1998:i:1:p:53-68.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2009Prospective Students Perceptions of University Brands: An Empirical Study. (2009). Bennett, Roger ; Ali-Choudhury, Rehnuma . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:19:y:2009:i:1:p:85-107.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2012Students trust, value and loyalty: evidence from higher education in Brazil. (2012). Sampaio, Claudio Hoffmann ; Kleinowski, Hamilton ; Perin, Marcelo Gattermann . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:22:y:2012:i:1:p:83-100.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2008SERVMO: A Measure for Service-Driven Market Orientation in Higher Education. (2008). Voon, B. H.. In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:17:y:2008:i:2:p:216-237.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
1997The Price Differentials Impact on Retention, Recruitment, and Quality in a Public University. (1997). Little, Michael W. ; Wetzel, James ; O'Toole, Dennis. In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:37-51.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2012Modeling antecedents of student loyalty in higher education. (2012). Perin, Marcelo Gattermann ; Sampaio, Claudio Hoffmann . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:22:y:2012:i:1:p:101-116.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
1997A Reconceptualization of the Marketing Mix: Using the 4 Cs to Improve Marketing Planning in Higher Education. (1997). Wasmer, D. J. ; Stevenson, Julie ; Williams, James R.. In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:29-35.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2010Understanding the characteristics of effective professors: the students perspective. (2010). Gruber, Thorsten ; Voss, Roediger ; Reppel, Alexander . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:20:y:2010:i:2:p:175-190.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
1998Differences in College Choice Criteria Between Deciding Students and Their Parents. (1998). Broekemier, Greg M. ; Seshadri, Srivatsa . In: Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:9:y:1998:i:3:p:1-13.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:


YearTitleSee

Cites in year: CiY


Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.