Is this page useful for you? Then, help us to keep the service working. Please have a look to our donations page ... Thanks for your help!!
Last updated December, 3 2015 760.408 documents processed, 20.499.313 references and 8.066.571 citations

Discussion Papers / University of Oxford, Nuffield College

null

Impact Factor

0.77

5-Years IF

3

5-Years H index

[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators

Raw data

IF AIF IF5 DOC CDO CCU CIF CIT D2Y C2Y D5Y C5Y %SC CiY II AII
19900.08000 (%)0.05
19910.08000 (%)0.05
19920.09000 (%)0.05
19930.1000 (%)0.05
19940.11000 (%)0.05
19950.15000 (%)0.1
19960.19000 (%)0.09
19970.2000 (%)0.08
19980.21000 (%)0.12
19990.27000 (%)0.15
20000.36000 (%)0.14
20010.36000 (%)0.17
20020.37000 (%)0.18
20030.39000 (%)0.18
20040.41000 (%)0.18
20050.43000 (%)0.22
20060.45000 (%)0.19
20070.38000 (%)0.17
20080.38000 (%)0.17
20090.35000 (%)0.17
20100.32553000 (%)0.15
20111.20.411.251060.6105656 (%)0.2
20120.90.460.921290.753109109 (%)0.21
20130.290.490.7511390.69172129 (%)0.22
20140.560.7713100.7731310 (%)0.3
 
IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
IF5: Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y
DOC: Number of documents published in year y
CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF: Cumulative impact factor
CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
D5Y: Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5
C5Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5
%SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

 

50 most cited documents in this series:

[Click on heading to sort table]

YearTitleCited
2010Who should be called to the lab? A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. (2010). Duch, Raymond . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010001.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23
2011Lifting the veil of ignorance: An experiment on the contagiousness of norm violations. (2011). Diekmann, Andreas ; Rauhut, Heiko . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011004.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5
2010The Consistency of Fairness Rules: An Experimental Study. (2010). Ubeda, Paloma . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010005.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3
2011Individual notions of distributive justice and relative economic status. (2011). Barr, Abigail ; Burns, Justine ; Shaw, Ingrid . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011005.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3
2010Revisiting Michael McBride’s experiment about “Money, happiness, and aspirations”. (2010). Barr, Abigail . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010003.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3
2011Decision costs in legislative bargaining: An experimental analysis. (2011). Vanberg, Christoph ; Miller, Luis . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011002.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
Ethnic discrimination and signals of trustworthiness in an online market: Evidence from two field experiments. (2012). Przepiorka, Wojtek . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2012002.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2013Gender Differences and Dynamics in Competition: The Role of Luck. (2013). Gill, David . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2013001.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2012Good Samaritans and the Market: Experimental Evidence on Other-Regarding Preferences. (2012). Fafchamps, Marcel ; Belot, Michele . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2012001.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1
2010Are Women More Sensitive to the Decision-Making Context?. (2010). Ubeda, Paloma . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010004.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1

50 most relevant documents in this series:

Papers most cited in the last two years. [Click on heading to sort table]

YearTitleCited
2010Who should be called to the lab? A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. (2010). Duch, Raymond . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010001.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13
2011Lifting the veil of ignorance: An experiment on the contagiousness of norm violations. (2011). Diekmann, Andreas ; Rauhut, Heiko . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011004.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5
2011Individual notions of distributive justice and relative economic status. (2011). Barr, Abigail ; Burns, Justine ; Shaw, Ingrid . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011005.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2
2011Decision costs in legislative bargaining: An experimental analysis. (2011). Vanberg, Christoph ; Miller, Luis . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:cex:dpaper:2011002.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:

[Click on heading to sort table]

YearTitleSee

Cites in year: CiY

Recent citations received in: 2012

[Click on heading to sort table]

YearTitleSee

Recent citations received in: 2011

[Click on heading to sort table]

YearTitleSee

10 most frequent citing series:

[Click on heading to sort table]

SeriesCited

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.