0.15
Impact Factor
0.23
5-Years IF
2
5-Years H index
0.15
Impact Factor
0.23
5-Years IF
2
5-Years H index
[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
IF | AIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CCU | CIF | CIT | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1991 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1992 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1993 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1994 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1995 | 0.15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.1 | ||||||||||
1996 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1997 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.08 | ||||||||||
1998 | 0.21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.12 | ||||||||||
1999 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
2000 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.14 | ||||||||||
2001 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2002 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2003 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2004 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2005 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.22 | ||||||||||
2006 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2007 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2008 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2009 | 0.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2010 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
2011 | 0.41 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 (14.3%) | 0.2 | ||||||||
2012 | 0.2 | 0.46 | 0.2 | 16 | 26 | 3 | 0.12 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 2 | (%) | 0.21 | ||
2013 | 0.15 | 0.49 | 0.15 | 4 | 30 | 4 | 0.13 | 26 | 4 | 26 | 4 | (%) | 0.22 | |||
2014 | 0.15 | 0.56 | 0.23 | 30 | 7 | 0.23 | 20 | 3 | 30 | 7 | (%) | 0.3 |
  IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y IF5: Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y CIF: Cumulative impact factor CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 D5Y: Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 C5Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 %SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
|
 
50 most cited documents in this series:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2012 | Australiaâs Pacific Seasonal Worker Pilot Scheme: why has take-up been so low?. (2012). Hay, Danielle ; Howes, Stephen . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1217. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 5 |
2011 | Improvements in the World Banks Ease of Doing Business Rankings: Do they translate into greater foreign direct investment inflows?. (2011). Jayasuriya, Dinuk . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1108. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 4 |
2011 | An overview of aid effectiveness, determinants and strategies. (2011). . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1101. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2012 | A Very Real and Practical Contribution? - Lessons from the Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership. (2012). Olbrei, Erik ; Howes, Stephen . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1216. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2011 | Measuring Poverty in the Pacific. (2011). Morris, Matthew . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1109. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2012 | Global sustainability: the sequel. (2012). Davies, Robin . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1219. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2011 | Does the World Bank have a micro-macro paradox or do the data deceive?. (2011). . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1105. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
50 most relevant documents in this series:
Papers most cited in the last two years. [Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2012 | Australiaâs Pacific Seasonal Worker Pilot Scheme: why has take-up been so low?. (2012). Hay, Danielle ; Howes, Stephen . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1217. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 5 |
2011 | Improvements in the World Banks Ease of Doing Business Rankings: Do they translate into greater foreign direct investment inflows?. (2011). Jayasuriya, Dinuk . In: Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers. RePEc:een:devpol:1108. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 4 |
Citing documents used to compute impact factor 3:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | See |
---|---|---|
2014 | Skill Development and Regional Mobility: Lessons from the Australia-Pacific Technical College - Working Paper 370. (2014). Michael Clemens, Colum Graham,, ; Howes, Stephen . In: Working Papers. RePEc:cgd:wpaper:370. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Le Pacifique insulaire dans le cadre déchange multilatéral : quel accord de libre-échange pour les territoires français du Pacifique ?. (2014). Lagadec, Gael ; Ellero, Jeremy . In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:60016. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Le Pacifique insulaire dans le cadre déchange multilatéral : quel accord de libre-échange pour les territoires français du Pacifique ?. (2014). Lagadec, Gael ; Ellero, Jeremy . In: MPRA Paper. RePEc:pra:mprapa:60043. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.
Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.