0.19
Impact Factor
0.09
5-Years IF
2
5-Years H index
0.19
Impact Factor
0.09
5-Years IF
2
5-Years H index
[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
IF | AIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CCU | CIF | CIT | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.03 | ||||||||||
1991 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1992 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1993 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1994 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1995 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.07 | ||||||||||
1996 | 0.23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1997 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1998 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.1 | ||||||||||
1999 | 0.31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.13 | ||||||||||
2000 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
2001 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.16 | ||||||||||
2002 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2003 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2004 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.21 | ||||||||||
2005 | 0.54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.22 | ||||||||||
2006 | 0.52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.21 | ||||||||||
2007 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2008 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.2 | ||||||||||
2009 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2010 | 0.44 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.16 | |||||||||
2011 | 0.53 | 21 | 37 | 16 | 16 | (%) | 0.21 | |||||||||
2012 | 0.58 | 16 | 53 | 9 | 37 | 37 | (%) | 0.22 | ||||||||
2013 | 0.03 | 0.71 | 0.02 | 21 | 74 | 1 | 0.01 | 2 | 37 | 1 | 53 | 1 | (%) | 0.25 | ||
2014 | 0.19 | 0.81 | 0.09 | 4 | 78 | 7 | 0.09 | 37 | 7 | 74 | 7 | (%) | 0.28 |
  IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y IF5: Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y CIF: Cumulative impact factor CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 D5Y: Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 C5Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 %SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
|
 
50 most cited documents in this series:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2012 | New St. Louis Fed banking and economic research. (2012). anonymous, . In: Central Banker. RePEc:fip:fedlcb:y:2012:i:winter:x:5. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 7 |
2012 | In-depth: the big banks: too complex to manage?. (2012). anonymous, . In: Central Banker. RePEc:fip:fedlcb:y:2012:i:winter:x:1. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2013 | Can the U.S. achieve long-run fiscal sustainability?. (2013). anonymous, . In: Central Banker. RePEc:fip:fedlcb:y:2013:i:summer:x:3. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
50 most relevant documents in this series:
Papers most cited in the last two years. [Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2012 | New St. Louis Fed banking and economic research. (2012). anonymous, . In: Central Banker. RePEc:fip:fedlcb:y:2012:i:winter:x:5. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 7 |
2013 | Can the U.S. achieve long-run fiscal sustainability?. (2013). anonymous, . In: Central Banker. RePEc:fip:fedlcb:y:2013:i:summer:x:3. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2012 | In-depth: the big banks: too complex to manage?. (2012). anonymous, . In: Central Banker. RePEc:fip:fedlcb:y:2012:i:winter:x:1. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
Citing documents used to compute impact factor 7:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | See |
---|---|---|
2014 | Consumersâ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. (2014). Van Loo, Ellen J. ; Verbeke, Wim ; Caputo, Vincenzina ; Nayga, Rodolfo M.. In: Food Policy. RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:49:y:2014:i:p1:p:137-150. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | GONE FISHINâ EFFECTS IN RETURNS. (2014). Dumitriu, Ramona ; Stefanescu, Razvan . In: Risk in Contemporary Economy. RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2014:p:254-261. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Firm persistence in technological innovation: the relevance of organizational innovation. (2014). Haned, Naciba ; Uyen, Nguyen-Thi Thuc ; Mothe, Caroline . In: Post-Print. RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01133555. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Business experience and start-up size: Buying more lottery tickets next time around?. (2014). Coad, Alex ; Roberts, Richard ; Nightingale, Paul ; Frankish, Julian . In: Small Business Economics. RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:43:y:2014:i:3:p:529-547. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Pension financing in China: Is there a looming crisis?. (2014). Beland, Daniel ; Zhang, Sifeng ; Wang, Lijian . In: China Economic Review. RePEc:eee:chieco:v:30:y:2014:i:c:p:143-154. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Do Organic Inputs in African Subsistence Agriculture Raise Productivity? Evidence from Plot Data of Malawi Household Surveys. (2014). Zant, Wouter . In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers. RePEc:tin:wpaper:20140114. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Les dangers de la bulle immobilière chinoise. (2014). Gaulard, Mylene . In: Revue Tiers-Monde. RePEc:cai:rtmarc:rtm_219_0077. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.
Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.