0.12
Impact Factor
0.06
5-Years IF
1
5-Years H index
0.12
Impact Factor
0.06
5-Years IF
1
5-Years H index
[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
IF | AIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CCU | CIF | CIT | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1991 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1992 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1993 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1994 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1995 | 0.15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.1 | ||||||||||
1996 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1997 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.08 | ||||||||||
1998 | 0.21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.12 | ||||||||||
1999 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
2000 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.14 | ||||||||||
2001 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2002 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2003 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2004 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2005 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.22 | ||||||||||
2006 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2007 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2008 | 0.38 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | |||||||||
2009 | 0.35 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | (%) | 0.17 | |||||||||
2010 | 0.32 | 11 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 3 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||
2011 | 0.17 | 0.41 | 0.14 | 4 | 18 | 2 | 0.11 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 1 (100%) | 0.2 | ||
2012 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 7 | 25 | 1 | 0.04 | 15 | 1 | 18 | 1 | (%) | 0.21 | |||
2013 | 0.49 | 10 | 35 | 2 | 11 | 25 | (%) | 0.22 | ||||||||
2014 | 0.12 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 5 | 40 | 2 | 0.05 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 33 | 2 | 1 (33.3%) | 0.3 |
  IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y IF5: Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y CIF: Cumulative impact factor CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 D5Y: Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 C5Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 %SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
|
 
50 most cited documents in this series:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2014 | The Economics of Presenteeism: A discrete choice & count model
framework. (2014). Pedersen, Kjeld Moller ; Skagen, Kristian . In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2014_002. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
The Danish Survey on Voluntary Health Insurance 2009. (2010). Kiil, Astrid ; Pedersen, Kjeld Moller . In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2009_003. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 | |
2013 | Is the quality of hospital care price sensitive? Regression kink
estimates from a volume dependent price setting scheme. (2013). Fe, Eduardo ; Kristensen, Soren Rud ; Bech, Mickael ; Mainz, Jan . In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2013_004. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2011 | Sickness absence and voluntary employer paid health insurance. (2011). Pedersen, Kjeld Moller . In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2011_004. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2010 | Exploring the relationship between costs and quality - Does the
joint evaluation of costs and quality alter the ranking of Danish
hospital departments?. (2010). Street, Andrew ; Arendt, Jacob Nielsen ; Anne, Hvenegaard ; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte . In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2009_006. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2014 | Normative foundations for equity-sensitive population health
evaluation functions. (2014). Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. ; osterdal, Lars Peter . In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2014_001. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2010 | Determinants of inequalities in health with focus on retired - with
particular regard to retired Danes. (2010). Terkel, Christiansen ; Hakkinen, Unto ; Jorgen, Lauridsen . In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2009_004. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2013 | On the measurement of the (multidimensional) inequality of health
distributions. (2013). Hougaard, Jens Leth ; osterdal, Lars Peter ; Moreno-Tereno, Juan D.. In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2013_009. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
50 most relevant documents in this series:
Papers most cited in the last two years. [Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2014 | The Economics of Presenteeism: A discrete choice & count model
framework. (2014). Pedersen, Kjeld Moller ; Skagen, Kristian . In: COHERE Working Paper. RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2014_002. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
Citing documents used to compute impact factor 2:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | See |
---|---|---|
2014 | Normative foundations for equity-sensitive population health evaluation functions. (2014). , ; OSTERDAL, Lars P. ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan . In: CORE Discussion Papers. RePEc:cor:louvco:2014031. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | A Permutation Test and Estimation Alternatives for the Regression Kink Design. (2014). Ganong, Peter ; Jager, Simon . In: IZA Discussion Papers. RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8282. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.
Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.