0.09
Impact Factor
0.04
5-Years IF
1
5-Years H index
0.09
Impact Factor
0.04
5-Years IF
1
5-Years H index
[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
IF | AIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CCU | CIF | CIT | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.03 | ||||||||||
1991 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1992 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1993 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1994 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1995 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.07 | ||||||||||
1996 | 0.23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1997 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1998 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.1 | ||||||||||
1999 | 0.31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.13 | ||||||||||
2000 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
2001 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.16 | ||||||||||
2002 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2003 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2004 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.21 | ||||||||||
2005 | 0.54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.22 | ||||||||||
2006 | 0.52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.21 | ||||||||||
2007 | 0.45 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | |||||||||
2008 | 0.48 | 17 | 30 | 3 | 13 | 13 | (%) | 0.2 | ||||||||
2009 | 0.48 | 14 | 44 | 1 | 30 | 30 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||
2010 | 0.44 | 9 | 53 | 1 | 31 | 44 | (%) | 0.16 | ||||||||
2011 | 0.53 | 0.04 | 16 | 69 | 2 | 0.03 | 23 | 53 | 2 | (%) | 0.21 | |||||
2012 | 0.58 | 16 | 85 | 3 | 25 | 69 | (%) | 0.22 | ||||||||
2013 | 0.71 | 0.03 | 18 | 103 | 2 | 0.02 | 32 | 72 | 2 | (%) | 0.25 | |||||
2014 | 0.09 | 0.81 | 0.04 | 15 | 118 | 3 | 0.03 | 34 | 3 | 73 | 3 | (%) | 0.28 |
  IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y IF5: Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y CIF: Cumulative impact factor CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 D5Y: Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 C5Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 %SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
|
 
50 most cited documents in this series:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2008 | Evaluation of Financial Performance: A Dialectics. (2008). Bardia, S C. In: The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices. RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:07:y:2008:i:1:p:36-49. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2012 | Entropic Analysis in Financial Forensics. (2012). Sebastin, A ; Reddy, Y V. In: The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices. RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:11:y:2012:i:3:p:42-57. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2010 | Disclosure of Intangible Assets in Indian Drugs and Pharmaceutical Industry. (2010). Chander, Subhash ; Mehra, Vishakha . In: The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices. RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:09:y:2010:i:4:p:7-23. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2009 | The Activity-Based Costing Method: Development and Applications. (2009). . In: The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices. RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:08:y:2009:i:1:p:7-22. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2012 | The Determinants of Corporate Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence
from the Tunisian Capital Market. (2012). Kolsi, Mohamed Chakib . In: The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices. RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:11:y:2012:i:4:p:49-68. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2008 | Inventory and Working Capital Management: An Empirical Analysis. (2008). Singh, Pradeep . In: The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices. RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:07:y:2008:i:2:p:53-73. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2012 | Factors Affecting the Quality of Audit Committee: A Study. (2012). Zarei, Fatemeh ; Zanjirdar, Majid ; Salehi, Mahdi . In: The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices. RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:11:y:2012:i:4:p:34-48. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
50 most relevant documents in this series:
Papers most cited in the last two years. [Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|
Citing documents used to compute impact factor 3:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | See |
---|---|---|
2014 | Factors Affecting Audit Committee Quality in Nigeria. (2014). Ogochukwu, Okafor Gloria ; Onuora, Oraka Azubuike ; Chukwunedu, Okaro Sunday . In: International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:12:p:397-423. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Comparison of cosmetic earnings management for the developed markets and emerging markets: Some empirical evidence from the United States and Taiwan. (2014). Lin, Fengyi ; Wu, Sheng-Fu . In: Economic Modelling. RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:36:y:2014:i:c:p:466-473. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2014 | Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Voluntary Disclosure Compliance. The Case of Banks in Jordan. (2014). Al Sawalqa, Fawzi . In: International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences. RePEc:hur:ijaraf:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:369-384. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
10 most frequent citing series:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.
Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.