0.06
Impact Factor
0.04
5-Years IF
2
5-Years H index
0.06
Impact Factor
0.04
5-Years IF
2
5-Years H index
[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
IF | AIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CCU | CIF | CIT | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1991 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1992 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1993 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1994 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1995 | 0.15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.1 | ||||||||||
1996 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1997 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.08 | ||||||||||
1998 | 0.21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.12 | ||||||||||
1999 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
2000 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.14 | ||||||||||
2001 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2002 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2003 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2004 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2005 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.22 | ||||||||||
2006 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2007 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2008 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2009 | 0.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2010 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
2011 | 0.41 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0.14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.2 | ||||||
2012 | 0.46 | 10 | 17 | 2 | 0.12 | 8 | 7 | 7 | (%) | 2 | 0.2 | 0.21 | ||||
2013 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 0.18 | 8 | 25 | 3 | 0.12 | 6 | 17 | 3 | 17 | 3 | (%) | 0.22 | ||
2014 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.04 | 25 | 1 | 0.04 | 18 | 1 | 25 | 1 | (%) | 0.3 |
  IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y IF5: Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y CIF: Cumulative impact factor CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 D5Y: Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 C5Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 %SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
|
 
50 most cited documents in this series:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2013 | A contest success function for rankings. (2013). Vesperoni, Alberto . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2013_008. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 5 |
2012 | The impact of armed conflict on economic performance. Evidence from Rwanda. (2012). Verpoorten, Marijke ; Serneels, Pieter . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2012_005. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 3 |
2012 | The effect of within-group inequality in a conflict against a unitary threat. (2012). Cubel, Maria ; Sanchez-Pages, Santiago . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2012_004. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2012 | Citizenry Accountability in Autocracies. The Political Economy of Good Governance in China. (2012). Gilli, Mario . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2012_003. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2011 | Drugs and Violence in Afghanistan: A Panel VAR with Unobserved Common Factor Analysis. (2011). Elia, Leandro ; Bove, Vincenzo . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2011_002. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2012 | Clash of Civilizations, Culture and Conflict. (2012). Gokmen, Gunes . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2012_008. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
2013 | Political Cycles in Public Expenditure: Butter vs Guns. (2013). . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2013_007. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
50 most relevant documents in this series:
Papers most cited in the last two years. [Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|
2013 | A contest success function for rankings. (2013). Vesperoni, Alberto . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2013_008. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 5 |
2012 | The effect of within-group inequality in a conflict against a unitary threat. (2012). Cubel, Maria ; Sanchez-Pages, Santiago . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2012_004. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
2012 | The impact of armed conflict on economic performance. Evidence from Rwanda. (2012). Verpoorten, Marijke ; Serneels, Pieter . In: NEPS Working Papers. RePEc:ris:nepswp:2012_005. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
Citing documents used to compute impact factor 1:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | See |
---|---|---|
2014 | Conflict and Trade: Implications for Agriculture and Food Security. (2014). D'Souza, Anna . In: Proceedings Issues, 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014, San Diego, California. RePEc:ags:iats14:197200. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
Recent citations received in: 2012
[Click on heading to sort table]
Year | Title | See |
---|---|---|
2012 | Citizenry Accountability in Autocracies. (2012). Mario, Gilli ; Yuan, Li. In: Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy. RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:18:y:2012:i:3:p:1-6:n:7. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
2012 | A Test of Huntingtonâs Thesis. (2012). Gunes, Gokmen . In: Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy. RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:18:y:2012:i:3:p:1-9:n:10. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.
Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.