Citation analysis for GfK Marketing Intelligence Review / De Gruyter Open

GfK Marketing Intelligence Review / De Gruyter Open

null

Impact Factor

null

5-Years IF

5-Years H index

[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators

Raw data

	IF	AIF	IF5	DOC	CDO	CCU	CIF	CIT	D2Y	C2Y	D5Y	C5Y	%SC	CiY	II	AII
1990		0.1			0				0		0		(%)			0.04
1991		0.09			0				0		0		(%)			0.04
1992		0.1			0				0		0		(%)			0.04
1993		0.11			0				0		0		(%)			0.05
1994		0.12			0				0		0		(%)			0.05
1995		0.19			0				0		0		(%)			0.07
1996		0.22			0				0		0		(%)			0.09
1997		0.27			0				0		0		(%)			0.09
1998		0.27			0				0		0		(%)			0.1
1999		0.31			0				0		0		(%)			0.13
2000		0.4			0				0		0		(%)			0.15
2001		0.4			0				0		0		(%)			0.15
2002		0.42			0				0		0		(%)			0.18
2003		0.44			0				0		0		(%)			0.18
2004		0.49			0				0		0		(%)			0.2
2005		0.53			0				0		0		(%)			0.21
2006		0.51			0				0		0		(%)			0.2
2007		0.44			0				0		0		(%)			0.18
2008		0.47			0				0		0		(%)			0.2
2009		0.47		14	14				0		0		(%)			0.19
2010		0.44		15	29			2	14		14		(%)			0.16
2011	0.03	0.51	0.03	16	45	1	0.02	2	29	1	29	1	(%)			0.2
2012		0.56		15	60				31		45		(%)			0.21
2013		0.66		20	80				31		60		(%)			0.23
2014		0.67	0.01	18	98	1	0.01		35		80	1	(%)			0.22
2015		0.82		16	114				38		84		(%)			0.27

IF:	Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF:	Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
IF5:	Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y
DOC:	Number of documents published in year y
CDO:	Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU:	Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF:	Cumulative impact factor
CIT:	Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
D5Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5
C5Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5
%SC:	Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY:	Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II:	Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII:	Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

50 most cited documents in this series:

#	Year	Title	Cited
1	2010	Left Behind Expectations - How to Prevent CRM Implementations from Failing. (2010). Albers, SÃÂ¶nke ; Sonke, Albers ; Goetz, Greve ; Becker Jan U., . In: GfK Marketing Intelligence Review. RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:34-41:n:5. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
2	2011	Common âWisdomâ Put to the Test: Sex in advertising â¦ only on Mars and not on Venus?. (2011). Dahl Darren W., ; Vohs Kathleen D., ; Jaideep, Sengupta . In: GfK Marketing Intelligence Review. RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:54-57:n:8. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
3	2011	Preference Measurement with Conjoint Analysis. Overview of State-of-the-Art Approaches and Recent Developments. (2011). Felix, Eggers ; Henrik, Sattler . In: GfK Marketing Intelligence Review. RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:36-47:n:5. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
4	2010	Trying Harder and Doing Worse: How Grocery Shoppers Track in-Store Spending. (2010). Pennings Joost M. E, ; Brian, Wansink ; Koert, van Ittersum . In: GfK Marketing Intelligence Review. RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:50-51:n:7. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1

50 most relevant documents in this series (papers most cited in the last two years)

#	Year	Title	Cited

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:

Year	Title

Recent citations (cites in year: CiY)

10 most frequent citing series

#		Series	Cites
1		Manuskripte aus den Instituten fÃ¼r Betriebswirtschaftslehre der UniversitÃ¤t Kiel / Christian-Albrechts-UniversitÃ¤t zu Kiel, Institut fÃ¼r Betriebswirtschaftslehre	1
2		Journal of the Association for Consumer Research / University of Chicago Press	1

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.