Citation analysis for Community Development Investment Review / Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Community Development Investment Review / Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

null

Impact Factor

0.01

5-Years IF

5-Years H index

[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators

Raw data

	IF	AIF	IF5	DOC	CDO	CCU	CIF	CIT	D2Y	C2Y	D5Y	C5Y	%SC	CiY	II	AII
1990		0.1			0				0		0		(%)			0.04
1991		0.09			0				0		0		(%)			0.04
1992		0.09			0				0		0		(%)			0.04
1993		0.1			0				0		0		(%)			0.05
1994		0.11			0				0		0		(%)			0.05
1995		0.2			0				0		0		(%)			0.07
1996		0.23			0				0		0		(%)			0.09
1997		0.27			0				0		0		(%)			0.09
1998		0.29			0				0		0		(%)			0.1
1999		0.32			0				0		0		(%)			0.13
2000		0.4			0				0		0		(%)			0.15
2001		0.4			0				0		0		(%)			0.15
2002		0.42			0				0		0		(%)			0.18
2003		0.44			0				0		0		(%)			0.19
2004		0.49			0				0		0		(%)			0.2
2005		0.53		6	6			5	0		0		(%)			0.21
2006		0.51		19	25			3	6		6		(%)			0.2
2007		0.45		13	38			2	25		25		(%)			0.18
2008		0.48			38				32		38		(%)			0.2
2009		0.47	0.03	23	61	1	0.02	3	13		38	1	(%)			0.19
2010		0.45	0.03	8	69	2	0.03	1	23		61	2	(%)			0.16
2011	0.03	0.52	0.06	17	86	4	0.05	1	31	1	63	4	(%)			0.2
2012		0.55			86	1	0.01		25		61		(%)			0.2
2013		0.62		31	117			2	17		48		(%)			0.22
2014		0.64	0.01	32	149	3	0.02	1	31		79	1	(%)			0.21
2015	0.02	0.69	0.01		149	3	0.02		63	1	88	1	(%)			0.22
2016		0.85	0.01	12	161	3	0.02		32		80	1	(%)			0.26

IF:	Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF:	Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
IF5:	Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y
DOC:	Number of documents published in year y
CDO:	Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU:	Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF:	Cumulative impact factor
CIT:	Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
D5Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5
C5Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5
%SC:	Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY:	Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II:	Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII:	Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

50 most cited documents in this series:

#	Year	Title	Cited
1	2005	The new markets tax credit program: a midcourse assessment. (2005). Stankiewicz, Gregory M. ; Rubin, Julia Sass . In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2005:p:1-11:n:v.1no.1. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	5
2	2006	Innovative activity in rural areas: the importance of local and regional characteristics. (2006). Barkley, David L. ; Henry, Mark S. ; Lee, Doohee. In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2006:p:1-14:n:v.2no.3. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
3	2007	Investment intermediaries in economic development: Linking public pension funds to urban revitalization. (2007). Clark, Gordon L. ; Hebb, Tessa ; Hagerman, Lisa A.. In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2007:p:45-65:n:v.3no.1. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
4	2013	Social impact bonds: Using impact investment to expand effective social programs. (2013). Ragin, Luther ; Palandjian, Tracy . In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:00004. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
5	2011	Global agricultural value chains: sustainable growth as a means for sustainable development. (2011). Devaney, Patricia Lee . In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2011:p:2-11:n:v.7no.1. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
6	2010	Making the case for social metrics and impact investing. (2010). Brandenburg, Margot . In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2010:p:47-49:n:v.6no.1. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
7	2009	Exploring the continuum of social and financial returns: when does a nonprofit become a social enterprise?. (2009). Brozek, Kathy O.. In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2009:p:7-17:n:v.5no.2. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
8	2009	Impact investing: harnessing capital markets to solve problems at scale. (2009). Bugg-Levine, Antony ; Goldstein, John . In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2009:p:30-41:n:v.5no.2. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
9	2014	Bringing down green financing costs: how a state-sponsored bank might be the key. (2014). Kauffman, Richard L. In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:00038. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
10	2013	Social impact bonds: lessons learned so far. (2013). Liebman, Jeffrey ; Sellman, Alina ; Gillette, Ryan ; Belinsky, Michael ; Azemati, Hanna ; Wyse, Angela . In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2013:p:23-33:n:v.9no.1. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
11	2009	Financial stress and its physical effects on individuals and communities. (2009). Choi, Laura . In: Community Development Investment Review. RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2009:p:120-122:n:v.5no.3. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1

50 most relevant documents in this series (papers most cited in the last two years)

#	Year	Title	Cited

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:

Year	Title

Recent citations (cites in year: CiY)

Recent citations received in 2013

Year	Citing document

10 most frequent citing series

#	Series	Cites
1	Journal of Business Ethics / Springer	2
2	Entrepreneurship Research Journal / De Gruyter	2
3	Social Science & Medicine / Elsevier	1
4	Food Policy / Elsevier	1
5	GRET Publications and Working Papers / GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of NeuchÃ¢tel	1

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.