Citation analysis for Discussion Papers / CEESA: Central and Eastern European Sustainable Agriculture International Research Project

Discussion Papers / CEESA: Central and Eastern European Sustainable Agriculture International Research Project

null

Impact Factor

null

5-Years IF

5-Years H index

[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators

Raw data

	IF	AIF	IF5	DOC	CDO	CCU	CIF	CIT	D2Y	C2Y	D5Y	C5Y	%SC	CiY	II	AII
1990		0.11			0				0		0		(%)			0.06
1991		0.1			0				0		0		(%)			0.04
1992		0.1			0				0		0		(%)			0.05
1993		0.13			0				0		0		(%)			0.06
1994		0.14			0				0		0		(%)			0.06
1995		0.17			0				0		0		(%)			0.1
1996		0.22			0				0		0		(%)			0.09
1997		0.22			0				0		0		(%)			0.09
1998		0.24			0				0		0		(%)			0.12
1999		0.3			0				0		0		(%)			0.15
2000		0.36			0				0		0		(%)			0.14
2001		0.36		5	5	1	0.2	15	0		0		5 (33.3%)	1	0.2	0.16
2002	0.4	0.37	0.4	7	12	2	0.17	4	5	2	5	2	1 (25%)			0.18
2003	0.58	0.39	0.58	6	18	16	0.89	4	12	7	12	7	(%)	1	0.17	0.19
2004		0.4	0.11	2	20	2	0.1	1	13		18	2	(%)			0.18
2005		0.42	0.1		20	2	0.1		8		20	2	(%)			0.2
2006		0.45	0.1		20	2	0.1		2		20	2	(%)			0.19
2007		0.38			20	1	0.05		0		15		(%)			0.16
2008		0.39			20	1	0.05		0		8		(%)			0.17
2009		0.36			20				0		2		(%)			0.17
2010		0.34			20				0		0		(%)			0.15
2011		0.4			20	2	0.1		0		0		(%)			0.19
2012		0.44			20				0		0		(%)			0.2
2013		0.49			20				0		0		(%)			0.2
2014		0.52			20				0		0		(%)			0.23
2015		0.54			20				0		0		(%)			0.24
2016		0.6			20				0		0		(%)			0.27
2017		0.64			20	1	0.05		0		0		(%)			0.28

IF:	Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF:	Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
IF5:	Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y
DOC:	Number of documents published in year y
CDO:	Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU:	Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF:	Cumulative impact factor
CIT:	Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
D5Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5
C5Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5
%SC:	Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY:	Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II:	Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII:	Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

50 most cited documents in this series:

#	Year	Title	Cited
1	2001	CONSTRAINTS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION IN BULGARIAS IRRIGATION SECTOR. (2001). Theesfeld, Insa. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18891. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	6
2	2001	The Evolution of Institutions in Transition. (2001). Hagedorn, Konrad ; Gatzweiler, Franz. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18895. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	5
3	2001	SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE - GETTING THE INSTITUTIONS RIGHT. (2001). Slangen, Louis H. G., . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18893. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
4	2002	Provision of Environmental Goods on Potentially Abandoned Land- The White Carpathians Protected Landscape Area. (2002). Ratinger, Tomas ; Krumalova, Veronika. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18885. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
5	2003	Patterns of Institutional Change for Sustainability in Central and Eastern European Agriculture. (2003). Gatzweiler, Franz. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18889. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
6	2001	CHALLENGES FOR AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES IN CEE COUNTRIES. (2001). Zellei, Anett. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18882. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
7	2002	The Commons in Transition. (2002). Sikor, Thomas. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18880. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
8	2004	Institutional Options for Sustainable Irrigation: An Evidence from Bulgaria. (2004). Penov, Ivan . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18898. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
9	2002	Farm level cost of reducing nitrate leaching by economic instruments in Croatian farming systems. (2002). Sumelius, John ; Grgic, Zoran ; Franic, Ramona ; Mesic, Milan. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18884. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
10	2003	Policy Recommendations for Pursuing a Sustainable Agriculture in a Small Rural Community in Romania. (2003). Toma, Luiza. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18896. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
11	2002	Economic and Ecological Transformation Processes in East German Water Management Regimes: The Role of Property Rights and Governance Structures. (2002). Schleyer, Christian. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18890. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
12		Agriculture and Protection of Landscape Area of the White Carpathians. (2003). Backman, Stefan ; Krumalova, Veronika. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18883. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
13	2001	ANALYSING INSTITUTIONS, POLICIES, & FARMING SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN TRANSITION. (2001). Gatzweiler, Franz ; Zellei, Anett ; Sipilainen, Timo ; Backman, Stefan . In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18894. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
14	2003	Institutional Options for the Protection of Open Space: Evidence from Poland. (2003). Wasilewski, Adam ; Sikor, Thomas. In: Discussion Papers. RePEc:ags:ceesdp:18887. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1

50 most relevant documents in this series (papers most cited in the last two years)

#	Year	Title	Cited

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:

Year	Title

Recent citations (cites in year: CiY)

10 most frequent citing series

#		Series	Cites

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.