0.11
Impact Factor
0.11
5-Years IF
1
5-Years H index
0.11
Impact Factor
0.11
5-Years IF
1
5-Years H index
IF | AIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CCU | CIF | CIT | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
1990 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1991 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1992 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1993 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
1994 | 0.12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.04 | ||||||||||
1995 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.07 | ||||||||||
1996 | 0.23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1997 | 0.26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
1998 | 0.28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.1 | ||||||||||
1999 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.13 | ||||||||||
2000 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
2001 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.14 | ||||||||||
2002 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2003 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2004 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2005 | 0.52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.2 | ||||||||||
2006 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.2 | ||||||||||
2007 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
2008 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.2 | ||||||||||
2009 | 0.49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2010 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
2011 | 0.49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2012 | 0.52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||||
2013 | 0.58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.2 | ||||||||||
2014 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.2 | ||||||||||
2015 | 0.61 | 14 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.19 | ||||||||
2016 | 0.07 | 0.68 | 0.07 | 14 | 28 | 1 | 0.04 | 14 | 1 | 14 | 1 | (%) | 0.2 | |||
2017 | 0.11 | 0.73 | 0.11 | 14 | 42 | 3 | 0.07 | 28 | 3 | 28 | 3 | (%) | 0.22 |
IF: | Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y |
AIF: | Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y |
IF5: | Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y |
DOC: | Number of documents published in year y |
CDO: | Cumulative number of documents published until year y |
CCU: | Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y |
CIF: | Cumulative impact factor |
CIT: | Number of citations to papers published in year y |
D2Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
C2Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
D5Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
C5Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
%SC: | Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
CiY: | Cites in year y to documents published in year y |
II: | Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. |
AII: | Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
 
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2015 | The Influence of Package Attributes on Consumer Perception Among Generation Y. (2015). Mokr, Stanislav ; van Wichelen, Steven ; Drexler, Denis ; Souek, Martin ; Dufek, Ondej . In: European Journal of Business Science and Technology. RePEc:men:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:54-64. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 3 |
2 | 2015 | Does Access to External Finance Affect Development of Small and Medium Enterprises and Economic Growth?. (2015). Poderys, Dominykas . In: European Journal of Business Science and Technology. RePEc:men:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:43-53. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
# | Year | Title | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2015 | The Influence of Package Attributes on Consumer Perception Among Generation Y. (2015). Mokr, Stanislav ; van Wichelen, Steven ; Drexler, Denis ; Souek, Martin ; Dufek, Ondej . In: European Journal of Business Science and Technology. RePEc:men:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:54-64. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 3 |
Year | Title | |
---|---|---|
2017 | The Level of Shelves and Space Solution as One of the Key Factors for Consumer Attention. (2017). Drexler, Denis ; Souek, Martin . In: Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2017065051679. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | |
2017 | Consumer Perception of FoodâToâGo Products. (2017). Drexler, Denis ; Dufek, Ondej ; Mokr, Stanislav . In: Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2017065061895. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | |
2017 | Which Institutions Are Important for Firms Performance? Evidence from Bayesian Model Averaging Analysis. (2017). Kapounek, Svatopluk ; Fidrmuc, Jarko ; Siddiqui, Martin . In: Panoeconomicus. RePEc:voj:journl:v:64:y:2017:i:4:p:383-400. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
Year | Citing document |
---|
# | Series | Cites |
---|
Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.
Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.
CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated December, 2th 2018. Contact: CitEc Team