Citation analysis for PISA in Focus / OECD Publishing

Citation Profile [Updated: 2022-01-09 21:43:50]

5 Years H

Impact Factor

0.04

5 Years IF

0.05

Data available in this report

[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ] [more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators

Raw Data

	IF	AIF	CIF	IF5	DOC	CDO	CIT	NCI	CCU	D2Y	C2Y	D5Y	C5Y	SC	%SC	CiY	II	AII
1990	0	0.14	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.07
1991	0	0.11	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.06
1992	0	0.1	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.07
1993	0	0.13	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.07
1994	0	0.13	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.06
1995	0	0.18	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.09
1996	0	0.21	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.12
1997	0	0.23	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.13
1998	0	0.24	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.15
1999	0	0.32	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.21
2000	0	0.44	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.2
2001	0	0.4	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.22
2002	0	0.42	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.23
2003	0	0.42	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.24
2004	0	0.47	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.27
2005	0	0.49	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.29
2006	0	0.47	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.27
2007	0	0.39	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.22
2008	0	0.46	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.23
2009	0	0.43	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.22
2010	0	0.37	0	0	0	0	0		0	0		0			0		0	0.19
2011	0	0.46	0	0	11	11	24		0	0		0			0		0	0.25
2012	0	0.5	0	0	12	23	7		0	11		11			0		0	0.25
2013	0.04	0.5	0.03	0.04	11	34	4	1	1	23	1	23	1		0		0	0.24
2014	0.09	0.53	0.17	0.12	12	46	11	8	9	23	2	34	4		0	4	0.33	0.27
2015	0.17	0.53	0.21	0.24	12	58	23	12	21	23	4	46	11		0	1	0.08	0.27
2016	0.71	0.54	0.33	0.36	9	67	10	22	43	24	17	58	21		0	1	0.11	0.27
2017	0.57	0.54	0.2	0.23	12	79	2	16	59	21	12	56	13		0	1	0.08	0.27
2018	0.1	0.53	0.05	0.04	12	91	3	5	64	21	2	56	2		0		0	0.26
2019	0.08	0.55	0.08	0.07	11	102	2	8	72	24	2	57	4		0		0	0.32
2020	0.04	0.63	0.1	0.05	8	110	0	11	83	23	1	56	3		0		0	0.58

IF:	Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF:	Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
CIF:	Cumulative impact factor
IF5:	Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y
DOC:	Number of documents published in year y
CDO:	Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CIT:	Number of citations to papers published in year y
NCI:	Number of citations in year y
CCU:	Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
D2Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
D5Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5
C5Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5
SC:	selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
%SC:	Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY:	Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II:	Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII:	Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

50 most cited documents in this series

#	Year	Title	Cited
1	2015	What Lies Behind Gender Inequality in Education?. (2015). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:49-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	17
2	2011	When Students Repeat Grades or Are Transferred Out of School: What Does it Mean for Education Systems?. (2011). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:6-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	8
3	2011	Does Investing in After-School Classes Pay Off?. (2011). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:3-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	6
4	2011	School Autonomy and Accountability: Are They Related to Student Performance?. (2011). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:9-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	4
5	2012	Does Money Buy Strong Performance in PISA?. (2012). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:13-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	4
6	2016	Are low performers missing learning opportunities?. (2016). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:62-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
7	2014	Are 15-Year-Olds Creative Problem-solvers?. (2014). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:38-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
8	2011	Private schools: Who Benefits?. (2011). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:7-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
9	2016	Who are the low-performing students?. (2016). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:60-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
10	2016	PISA 2015 Results in Focus. (2016). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:67-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
11	2015	How has Student Performance Evolved Over Time?. (2015). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:47-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
12	2016	How does PISA assess science literacy?. (2016). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:66-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
13	2014	Does Homework Perpetuate Inequities in Education?. (2014). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:46-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
14	2011	Does Participation in Pre-Primary Education Translate into Better Learning Outcomes at School?. (2011). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:1-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
15	2011	How Do Some Students Overcome Their Socio-Economic Background?. (2011). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:5-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
16	2013	Who are the Academic All-rounders?. (2013). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:31-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
17	2012	Do Todays 15-Year-Olds Feel Environmentally Responsible?. (2012). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:21-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
18	2014	When is Competition Between Schools Beneficial?. (2014). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:42-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
19	2012	Are Large Cities Educational Assets or Liabilities?. (2012). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:17-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
20	2014	Do 15-year-olds Know How to Manage Money?. (2014). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:41-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
21	2015	Can schools help to integrate immigrants?. (2015). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:57-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
22	2013	What Makes Urban Schools Different?. (2013). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:28-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
23	2018	PISA for Development: Results in Focus. (2018). Ward, Michael. In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:91-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
24	2015	Who are the best online readers?. (2015). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:55-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
25	2017	Are students happy?: PISA 2015 results: studentsÃ¢â¬â¢ well-being. (2017). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:71-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
26	2013	What Do Students Think About School?. (2013). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:24-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
27	2019	How are school-choice policies related to social diversity in schools?. (2019). , Oecd ; OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:96-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
28	2014	Are Disadvantaged Students more Likely to Repeat Grades?. (2014). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:43-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
29	2018	How has Internet use changed between 2012 and 2015?. (2018). Echazarra, Alfonso. In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:83-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
30	2019	Is there a generational divide in environmental optimism?. (2019). , Oecd ; OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:95-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
31	2018	In which countries and schools do disadvantaged students succeed?. (2018). Avvisati, Francesco. In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:80-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
32	2019	Why donÃ¢â¬â¢t more girls choose to pursue a science career?. (2019). Mostafa, Tarek . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:93-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
33	2017	Do students spend enough time learning?. (2017). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:73-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
34	2016	Should all students be taught complex mathematics?. (2016). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:65-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
35	2014	Does Pre-primary Education Reach Those Who Need it Most?. (2014). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:40-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
36	2013	Does it Matter Which School a Student Attends?. (2013). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:27-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
37	2019	Does greater social diversity in schools have an impact on equity in learning outcomes?. (2019). GIVORD, Pauline. In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:97-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
38	2014	Do Countries with High Mean Performance in PISA Maintain their Lead as Students Age?. (2014). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:45-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1

50 most relevant documents in this series (papers most cited in the last two years)

#	Year	Title	Cited
1	2011	When Students Repeat Grades or Are Transferred Out of School: What Does it Mean for Education Systems?. (2011). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:6-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	7
2	2012	Does Money Buy Strong Performance in PISA?. (2012). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:13-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
3	2016	PISA 2015 Results in Focus. (2016). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:67-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
4	2011	How Do Some Students Overcome Their Socio-Economic Background?. (2011). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:5-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
5	2018	PISA for Development: Results in Focus. (2018). Ward, Michael. In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:91-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
6	2017	Are students happy?: PISA 2015 results: studentsÃ¢â¬â¢ well-being. (2017). OECD, . In: PISA in Focus. RePEc:oec:eduddd:71-en. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2

Citing documents used to compute impact factor: 1

Year	Title
2020	Tracking and inequality: The results from Turkey. (2020). Gur, Bekir S ; Bolukba, Sema. In: International Journal of Educational Development. RePEc:eee:injoed:v:78:y:2020:i:c:s0738059320304211. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper

Recent citations

Recent citations received in 2019

Year	Citing document

Recent citations received in 2018

Year	Citing document

Recent citations received in 2017

Year	Citing document
2017	Tech Start-up Ecosystem in Dar es Salaam. (2017). Bank, World. In: World Bank Other Operational Studies. RePEc:wbk:wboper:28113. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper

10 most frequent citing series

#	Series	H	Cites
1	International Journal of Educational Development / Elsevier	10	7
2	Children and Youth Services Review / Elsevier	35	3
3	Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews / Elsevier	99	3
4	Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization / Elsevier	111	2
5	??????? ??????????? // Educational Studies Moscow / National Research University Higher School of Economics	1	2
6	Labour Economics / Elsevier	86	2
7	Journal of Policy Modeling / Elsevier	56	2
8	Economics Discussion Papers / University of Essex, Department of Economics	16	2
9	Energy Policy / Elsevier	134	2
10	Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow / National Research University Higher School of Economics	8	2
11	Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement / Springer	58	2