0.22
Impact Factor
0.07
5-Years IF
3
5-Years H index
CitEc is a RePEc service
providing citation data for Economics since 2001
providing citation data for Economics since 2001
Last updated December, 3 2015 760.408 documents
processed, 20.499.313 references and 8.066.571 citations
[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [
trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]
| IF | AIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CCU | CIF | CIT | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
| 1990 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
| 1991 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
| 1992 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
| 1993 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
| 1994 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.05 | ||||||||||
| 1995 | 0.15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.1 | ||||||||||
| 1996 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.09 | ||||||||||
| 1997 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.08 | ||||||||||
| 1998 | 0.21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.12 | ||||||||||
| 1999 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
| 2000 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.14 | ||||||||||
| 2001 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||||
| 2002 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
| 2003 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
| 2004 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.18 | ||||||||||
| 2005 | 0.43 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | (%) | 0.22 | |||||||||
| 2006 | 0.45 | 12 | 16 | 1 | 0.06 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 (100%) | 1 | 0.08 | 0.19 | ||||
| 2007 | 0.38 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 16 | 16 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||
| 2008 | 0.38 | 13 | 39 | 3 | 22 | 26 | (%) | 0.17 | ||||||||
| 2009 | 0.35 | 9 | 48 | 2 | 0.04 | 7 | 23 | 39 | (%) | 2 | 0.22 | 0.17 | ||||
| 2010 | 0.05 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 12 | 60 | 1 | 0.02 | 22 | 1 | 48 | 1 | (%) | 0.15 | |||
| 2011 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 12 | 72 | 2 | 0.03 | 1 | 21 | 56 | 2 | 1 (100%) | 0.2 | ||||
| 2012 | 0.04 | 0.46 | 0.04 | 6 | 78 | 2 | 0.03 | 3 | 24 | 1 | 56 | 2 | (%) | 0.21 | ||
| 2013 | 0.49 | 0.04 | 3 | 81 | 3 | 0.04 | 18 | 52 | 2 | (%) | 0.22 | |||||
| 2014 | 0.22 | 0.56 | 0.07 | 4 | 85 | 4 | 0.05 | 9 | 2 | 42 | 3 | (%) | 0.3 |
| IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y IF5: Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y DOC: Number of documents published in year y CDO: Cumulative number of documents published until year y CCU: Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y CIF: Cumulative impact factor CIT: Number of citations to papers published in year y D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 C2Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 D5Y: Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 C5Y: Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 %SC: Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 CiY: Cites in year y to documents published in year y II: Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. AII: Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
|
50 most cited documents in this series:
[Click on heading to sort table]
| Year | Title | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Volatility Risk. (2009). Wang, Zhiguang . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2009513. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 6 |
| 2012 | Consumers Willingness to Pay for Locally Produced Ground Beef: A Case Study. (2012). Langelett, George ; Xu, Pei ; Chang, Kuo-Liang ; Underwood, Keith . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2011538. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 3 |
| 2007 | Containing the Cost of Infant Formula to the WIC Program. (2007). . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2007491. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 3 |
| 2008 | ECONOMIC STIMULUS: CHARTING THE CAUTIOUS COURSE; ECONOMETRICS VERSUS
REGRESSION ANALYSIS. (2008). Li, Jing ; Sondey, John . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2008496. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
| 2006 | Investor Reluctance to Invest in Foreign Equities. (2006). Sondey, John ; Thompson, S. L.. In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2006471. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| 2009 | Economic Impact of Agriculture on South Dakota. (2009). Taylor, Gary . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2009507. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| 2008 | Dependency on the Ethanol Industry. (2008). Li, Jing ; Hamda, Yonas G.. In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2008503. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| 2011 | Corn Pest Risk Survey Results (South Dakota). (2011). Fausti, Scott . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2011528. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
50 most relevant documents in this series:
Papers most cited in the last two years. [Click on heading to sort table]
| Year | Title | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Volatility Risk. (2009). Wang, Zhiguang . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2009513. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 4 |
| 2012 | Consumers Willingness to Pay for Locally Produced Ground Beef: A Case Study. (2012). Langelett, George ; Xu, Pei ; Chang, Kuo-Liang ; Underwood, Keith . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2011538. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 3 |
| 2007 | Containing the Cost of Infant Formula to the WIC Program. (2007). . In: Issue Briefs. RePEc:sda:ibrief:2007491. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
Citing documents used to compute impact factor 2:
[Click on heading to sort table]
| Year | Title | See |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Country of origin and willingness to pay for pistachios: a chinese case. (2014). Xu, Pei ; Wang, Zhigang . In: Health Economics Review. RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:1-16. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
| 2014 | An empirical analysis on technophobia/technophilia in consumer market segmentation. (2014). Xu, Pei ; Wang, Zhigang . In: Agricultural and Food Economics. RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:1-16. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | [Citation Analysis] |
10 most frequent citing series:
[Click on heading to sort table]
Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.
Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.