Citation analysis for Reports / Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center

Reports / Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center

null

Impact Factor

null

5-Years IF

5-Years H index

[Raw data] [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ]
[more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations? Add them now] [Incorrect content? Let us know]

Main indicators

Raw data

	IF	AIF	IF5	DOC	CDO	CCU	CIF	CIT	D2Y	C2Y	D5Y	C5Y	%SC	CiY	II	AII
1990		0.1			0				0		0		(%)			0.06
1991		0.09			0	1			0		0		(%)			0.04
1992		0.1			0				0		0		(%)			0.05
1993		0.13			0				0		0		(%)			0.06
1994		0.14			0				0		0		(%)			0.06
1995		0.17			0				0		0		(%)			0.11
1996		0.22		1	1				0		0		(%)			0.1
1997		0.22			1				1		1		(%)			0.09
1998		0.24			1				1		1		(%)			0.13
1999		0.3			1				0		1		(%)			0.16
2000		0.37			1				0		1		(%)			0.14
2001		0.37			1				0		1		(%)			0.17
2002		0.37			1				0		0		(%)			0.18
2003		0.4			1				0		0		(%)			0.19
2004		0.41			1				0		0		(%)			0.18
2005		0.43		3	4				0		0		(%)			0.21
2006		0.44		3	7			1	3		3		1 (100%)			0.19
2007		0.37		3	10			2	6		6		1 (50%)			0.17
2008	0.17	0.39	0.11	2	12	1	0.08		6	1	9	1	(%)			0.17
2009		0.36		3	15	1	0.07	5	5		11		2 (40%)	1	0.33	0.17
2010	0.2	0.34	0.14	1	16	2	0.13		5	1	14	2	(%)			0.15
2011		0.41			16				4		12		(%)			0.2
2012		0.45	0.11		16	1	0.06		1		9	1	(%)			0.21
2013		0.5			16				0		6		(%)			0.2
2014		0.55			16				0		4		(%)			0.25
2015		0.57			16	2	0.13		0		1		(%)			0.26
2016		0.66			16				0		0		(%)			0.34

IF:	Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y
AIF:	Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y
IF5:	Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y
DOC:	Number of documents published in year y
CDO:	Cumulative number of documents published until year y
CCU:	Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y
CIF:	Cumulative impact factor
CIT:	Number of citations to papers published in year y
D2Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2
C2Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
D5Y:	Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5
C5Y:	Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5
%SC:	Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2
CiY:	Cites in year y to documents published in year y
II:	Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents.
AII:	Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y

50 most cited documents in this series:

#	Year	Title	Cited
1	2009	Is the Soybean Checkoff Program Working?. (2009). Bessler, David ; Capps, Oral ; Williams, Gary W.. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:90495. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	3
2	2007	Effectiveness of Marketing Order 906 in Promoting Sales of Texas Grapefruit and Oranges. (2007). Palma, Marco ; Williams, Gary W. ; Capps, Oral . In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:90752. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2
3	2009	Concentration in Beef Packing and Slaughter Cattle Pricing. (2009). Love, H. ; Capps, Oral ; Williams, Gary W.. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:90493. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
4	1971	Retail Test Marketing and Consumer Evaluation of Frozen Lamb. (1971). Sporleder, Thomas ; Branson, Robert E.. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:96414. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
5	2006	The Economic Effectiveness of the Cotton Checkoff Program. (2006). Williams, Gary W. ; Capps, Oral . In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:90753. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
6	1971	Feasibility of a Central Onion Sales Organization for South Texas. (1971). Connolly, Chan C.. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:96147. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
7	1973	Comparative Cost Analysis of Carbon Dioxide and Vacuum Packaged Boxed Beef: A Case Study. (1973). Sporleder, Thomas ; Vastine, William J.. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:97270. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
8	1970	TEMPROB: A Fortran IV Program for Calculating Temperature Probabilities from Extreme Minimum Temperature Data. (1970). Sporleder, Thomas. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:96143. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
9	1972	Market Response to Two Alternative Packages for U.S. No. 2 Grapefruit. (1972). Connolly, Chan C. ; Nichols, John P.. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:96627. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
10	1969	The Effect of Grade on Retail Sales of Fresh Texas Grapefruit. (1969). Nichols, John P.. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:96127. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
11	2009	Effects of Soybean Checkoff Research Expenditures on U.S. Soybean Yields and Net Revenue: A Time Series Analysis. (2009). Bessler, David. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:90494. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
12	1972	Primary Packaging Cost Analysis for Fresh Beef from Packer to Retail Distribution Center: A Case Study. (1972). Sporleder, Thomas. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:96424. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1
13	1969	The Effect of Point-of-Purchase Display Material on Sales of Fresh Texas Grapefruit. (1969). Sporleder, Thomas. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:96121. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	1

50 most relevant documents in this series (papers most cited in the last two years)

#	Year	Title	Cited
1	2009	Is the Soybean Checkoff Program Working?. (2009). Bessler, David ; Capps, Oral ; Williams, Gary W.. In: Reports. RePEc:ags:tamagr:90495. Full description at Econpapers \|\| Download paper	2

Citing documents used to compute impact factor 0:

Year	Title

Recent citations (cites in year: CiY)

10 most frequent citing series

#	Series	Cites
1	Reports / Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center	3
2	2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California / Agricultural and Applied Economics Association	2
3	Staff General Research Papers Archive / Iowa State University, Department of Economics	1
4	MPRA Paper / University Library of Munich, Germany	1

Warning!! This is still an experimental service. The results of this service should be interpreted with care, especially in research assessment exercises. The processing of documents is automatic. There still are errors and omissions in the identification of references. We are working to improve the software to increase the accuracy of the results.

Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series.